Commons:Help desk/Archive/2016/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Birth (maiden) name to married name

I just moved a page on Wikipedia from a woman's birth name to her new married name. Her article uses three Commons files and all three have her maiden name in their titles. Since the titles also contain years during which she was still using her birth name, my gut feeling is to leave them alone. I checked the archives and could find nothing on this. Am I wrong and should the three files be moved?  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  10:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Also just noticed there is a Commons category that uses the subject's birth name. I see no problem renaming the category; however, is it customary in these cases to delete the old category or redirect it?  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  10:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

I'd say don't rename the files, and it wouldn't fit any of the file renaming criteria anyway. Redirect the category instead of deleting it, since it's easy to imagine someone searching for the old name, or a link to the category existing somewhere. Hopefully the old name will be mentioned on the category page too. --ghouston (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much, ghouston! I'll take care of it.  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  13:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  14:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Uploading Image Files Created by Someone Else

I have two jpeg files I want to upload then insert in a Wikipedia article. They're photos of the subject taken by his father, and I'm sure he's okay with letting them be public domain. Who does he have to notify by email that it's okay for me to upload the files? Then isn't there a simple 1-2-3 for me to upload the files? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwisok (talk • contribs) 02:43, 01 June 2016 (UTC)

@Bwisok: Hello, you need to ask permission from the copyright holder (the subject's father) to release their photos under a free license (like CC-BY-SA-4.0). They can do that by sending an email to the OTRS. Thanks, ★ Poké95 03:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Pokefan. I believe I can find OTRS and have the father send the email to it. After that is done, where do I go to actually upload the files, then?

See File:2011–12 United States winter average temperature anomaly.gif; how can I fix the link there? Dustin (talk) 03:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Percent encoding, %5b for [ and %5d for ]. I fixed it. --ghouston (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the help; I'll keep this in mind in case any other characters give me link problems! Dustin (talk) 03:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Library of Congress images?

Can I upload the photograph of a deceased government official that has been digitized by the Library of Congress (http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2006005600/ ) and reported by the Library of Congress on its webpage for the image as having "no known restrictions on publication"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuprechtOfTheRhine (talk • contribs)

As I understand you can. Ruslik (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, this image File:T-90 saa aleppo.jpg is from an strange source, twitter user, facebook link broken or shutted down... I am not sure if this is a copyright violation, can somebody tell? By the way I don't know if this is the right place to ask this type of things, I followed Commons:How to detect copyright violations. Thanks. --Lluis tgn (talk) 20:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

It may be or may be not. However the deletion is still warranted as because the copyright status of this image is questionable. Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Advising Utah Historical society on how to upload a photo

Hi, I'm advising the Utah Historical society on how to upload this photo to the commons. I've gone over the CC-BY-SA license so they know what they are getting into! They own the copyright of the scan and the photo, which was taken in 1943. Let's assume they're fine with making a 300dpi version of the file free for everyone on the commons. How should they indicate the copyright of a photo when they upload it (i.e., basically that they are publishing it under much laxer license and it's the original copyright holders)? Can they just mark "this file is my own work"? Thanks, Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC). I'm posting this over at the copyright village pump too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk • contribs)

Why do they think that they own the copyright? Was the photo made by a photographer hired by the society? I have grave doubts about this claim. They likely own the physical photo but not the copyright. Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Other interested users should see the discussion at the Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Advising_Utah_Historical_society_on_how_to_upload_a_photo Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

This flower picture was taken in lalbagh botanical garden, Bangalore


--Manju anand (talk) 10:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Manju Anand

You didn't provide a licence. Please read the text in the orange box. --Magnus (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

I uploaded a photo (Mike Fleck.jpg) that was just marked as a copyright violation. It is a personal photo (not taken from the web) and is free to use. I may have marked something incorrectly when submitting it. Looking for direction on how to correct this problem. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrtlems (talk • contribs)


I can't look at the Commons file, because it's deleted, but the deletion note by the Commons administrator refers to this webpage, where the contents are claimed to be under the copyright of "The Pennsylvania Youth Congress Education Fund". if it's the same photo and if it's in the same resolution, then their claim of copyright benefits from the advantage of chronology, because apparently they published it in 2014, whereas your upload to Commons was in 2016. Given their chronological advantage, the burden then falls upon you to present evidence that the photo is yours. It might be done by showing that you are in possession of the original photograph, for example by uploading to Commons the photo in a better resolution or a less cropped version than the image published on the other website. If the file deleted from Commons was already a better version, you could draw the deleting admin's attention to that fact and ask him if he would accept to restore the file. You could also sort out the situation with The Pennsylvania Youth Congress Education Fund. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

logo uploading

I am creating my school article with school logo. With a source link reference. Is it copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impurnendu (talk • contribs)

  • If the logo is copyrighted (which it will be, unless it is very old or very simple) it is not acceptable on Commons without explicit license from the copyright holder. So, yes, most likely it is a copyright violation. "Source link reference" does not change anything about copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 21:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Older wikipedia articles

Hello. In the last couple of days, have i translated a article from english to my language, and i only need the pictures. I just thought i could copy-paste some of the pictures from the english article to mine, as stupid as i am, but the pictures was deleted instantly.

Now to my question. How to i use pictures from other wikipedia articles, in mine article?

Thank you

NielsThoegersen (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

  • There is no universal answer to that, because of different restrictions on different images. If the images are hosted here on Commons, then there should never be any problem. However, if they are in the English-language Wikipedia on a "fair use" basis, then they may not be acceptable in other Wikipedias which may each have different policies about "fair use". It would help a lot if you would indicate what article you are talking about and what language you are translating to. - Jmabel ! talk 16:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jmabel. I'm a translating the 2 english articles, en:Cheese (album) and en:Racine Carrée from english to the language, danish. I wanted to use the two pictures in the danish one, but they were deleted instantly. What can i do next?

NielsThoegersen (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Danish Wikipedia does not allow direct uploads and instead supports only uploads to Wikimedia Commons, that's why you arrived here. Wikimedia Commons allows only images that are free to use by everyone, for every purpose. Album covers are usually copyrighted and may not be uploaded here. The articles will have to make do without these images. --rimshottalk 21:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Sadly, Rimshot has this right. This is simply something where en-wiki is looser. - Jmabel ! talk 22:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
@NielsThoegersen: You may ask the copyright holder of the album cover to release their file under a free license (like CC-BY-SA-4.0). It may be impossible, but it's worth a try. If the copyright holder (irrevocably) agrees, then ask them to email the OTRS. ★ Poké95 00:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, @Pokéfan95: and @Rimshot: . But how do i "ask the copyrights holder“? (Im new here, im sorry.) Regards NielsThoegersen (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you guys, i got one last question. What are there going to happened, if i took the photo description text from this picture en:File:Cheese_Stromae.jpg in a english article, and put it in my danish article, with the same photo? Would it be deleted, once again? Regards NielsThoegersen (talk) 13:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

all categories removed from file

For example in this file - Ronaldinho y Khedira (5098210694).jpg - users removed all categories. Thus that file can't be found easily. Is that what is intended? Will a bot repair that by marking it uncategorized? --Xykoojy52 (talk) 18:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

I would revert these removals as no justification for them was provided. Ruslik (talk) 20:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
More to the point, I've added the more specific Category:Real Madrid CF vs AC Milan, 19 October, 2010 and Category:Ronaldinho. Someone who knows more about football than I can probably add additional useful categories. - Jmabel ! talk 20:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! However, in cases like this, no bot seems to mark files as uncategorised and therefore it appears to be necessary that someone has to come across accidentally and categorize it manually. I wonder how many files are without any category.--Xykoojy52 (talk) 06:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
@Xykoojy52: See Special:UncategorizedFiles. DMacks (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Alright then - those cases seem to be managed by a second bot run. Initial question answered, thanks!--Xykoojy52 (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Came in here by accident, and I do not consider me a football expert. Jmabel, it’s even worse: Compare the given source, and you find, the file was wrong categorized (I fixed this) and, more important, we do not see Ronaldinho and Sami Khedira on this image, but Karim Benzema and Mario Suárez (also fixed in description and categories), cf. this image: File:Ronaldinho and Khedira.jpg. I do not know, how this could happen. Because you are an admin, could you, please, rename the file without redirecting (it was only recently uploaded here)? My suggestion in analogy to the other files in Category:Real Madrid v Atlético Madrid, 7 November 2010 (all got their names from their Flickr title, as far as I see): “Benzema por arriba (5156470194).jpg”. (Yes, that’s the right Flickr ID for this.) — Speravir_Talk – 01:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
OK; renamed. - Jmabel ! talk 13:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
OK, too. — Speravir (Talk) – 22:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Can you please send me the confirmation link again on the same e-mail address. I accidently clicked on the "invalidate" link. I do not wanna lose the pictures I contributed to "Wiki Loves Earth India 2016". Please reply as soon as you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsingh173 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 7 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Hsingh173: You can do this yourself from Special:ChangeEmail (and no one else can do this for you). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Email contact for Secretary of Veteran Affairs, The United States

Request email address, or mailing address, for The Secretary of Veteran Affairs, The United States of America. Kindly, Wilton C. Carter, Col, Ret. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.172.118.85 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 9 June 2016‎ (UTC)

This is the help desk for the Wikimedia Commons media repository. Your question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Wikimedia Commons, so I'm puzzled as to what led you to ask here. A more reasonable place to look would be http://www.va.gov. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Something odd with the Creator template

A short question: Why does File:Calle de Bruselas de Jorge Letelier Nuñez.jpg appear in Category:Bad use of creator template - option? It simply includes {{Creator:Jorge Letelier Núñez}} without any parameters. Probably something to do with the "ñ" in the name? --WolfD59 (talk) 17:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, found out myself. The "Creator"-Template didn't have the {{{1|}}} in it that it should have by default. --WolfD59 (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: BMacZero (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

A Picture rights

The picture in: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Timnat#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:.D7.9E.D7.9E.D7.A9.D7.AA.D7.AA.D7.A4.D7.99_.D7.A7.D7.95.D7.A0.D7.92.D7.A8.D7.A1_.D7.91.D7.99.D7.A0.D7.9C.D7.90.D7.95.D7.9E.D7.99_.D7.A8.D7.90.D7.A9.D7.95.D7.9F_.D7.90.D7.A1.D7.98.D7.A8.D7.95.D7.A0.D7.95.D7.9E.D7.99.D7.9D_.D7.97.D7.95.D7.91.D7.91.D7.99.D7.9D.2C_.D7.91.D7.95.D7.9C.D7.95.D7.A0.D7.99.D7.94.2C_.D7.90.D7.99.D7.98.D7.9C.D7.99.D7.94.jpeg.7Cbase.3DImage_source.2Fheading.7D.7D was given to me by the daughter of the late Dr. Zeichek, https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%93%D7%95%D7%93_%D7%96%D7%99%D7%A6%27%D7%A7 from a publication he published. I donwt realy understand how to edit that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.71.3.51 (talk • contribs)

Who is the photographer who took this photo? Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, just remarked that very strange row of edits by User:87.123.63.223 related to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alleppey.jpg: File:Ad Astra Aero - BFW-M-18-d (CH191).jpg was imho vandalized by the new User:Divyacskn1289 (deletion request) as in fact 'reaction' on two DR started by me yesterday, obviously (see User contributions [1]+[2]) related to File:Alleppey.jpg. User:Divyacskn1289's imho harassment was 'undone' by User:87.123.63.223, but no reverted, commenting Rm deletion template. Adding this template is not what the user wanted to do.

So far, strange but not a serious problem, but then this was also commented on my user talk Fix wrong message; fix misleading header and add text by Divyacskn1289 here, which had been added somewhere on the Support Desk, and next, she/he answered at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alleppey.jpg, and even closed that DR which was started just 16 hours ago.
Finally, File talk:Alleppey.jpg was created by adding {Kept} one minute later...

Honestly, I don't have any problems that a DR request started by my will denied, but not like that one. I kindly ask for intervention, and to make a "kept" decision by a Wikimedia Commons administrator, thx and kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Just a note on this one:
The Support Desk request, upon which my actions were taken, is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:T5jcnikxzd9mu9yg.
I would not go so far as to claim User:Divyacskn1289 would be a "vandal". I think he is a new user, who does not yet know, what and when to do exactly. Noting this fact himself, he asked for help - if this is, then a fact in favor of User:Divyacskn1289.
Thanks for agreeing that File:Alleppey.jpg should be kept. It is true that in the absence of a deletion reason the file cannot be removed. In my eyes, the whole DR was superfluous, but so be it. --87.123.12.36 20:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong place to ask for admin intervention. Use the board intended for this purpose. Nonetheless, I've reversed the DR closure and expect it to be closed in no less than six days time. Green Giant (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests is grounds for closure of this deletion request: Deletion requests are not the place to attempt to change Commons policy, nor may requests be made simply to make a point. Any such requests may be speedily closed - this is the rule I implemented. Please use the Village Pump or the policy talk page if you wish to propose a change in policy.
Since Roland zh now himself kindly asked to make a "kept" decision, we now agree that there is no ground for deletion of this file. --87.123.12.36 20:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 Comment: what a ... :-( Roland zh did not "ask for", but assuemed those 'actions' should force a "kept" decision ... please stop mis-interpreting that simple request for intervention to allow a seriously done request for deletion.
from my side, an intervention already is done by your's User talk:Green Giant's action to allow a seriously done DR request, thank you. btw: although i thought to have moved related content from my talk to the file's talk, it seems lost, but no serious problem, closing from my side, regards, Roland zh (talk) 21:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Since no valid reason for deletion has been given, there is no reason to keep this request open. Your try to institute additional requirements for image uploads, which are not backed up by the according rules - at least not by the rules in their current form -, is out of scope to the deletion request. Commons:Deletion requests makes it very clear: Deletion requests are not the place to attempt to change Commons policy. Any such requests may be speedily closed. I do not have a problem granting you the additional six or what it is days, but in the absence of a valid deletion reason I do not see use in leaving the request open. Speedy closure only follows the rules. --87.123.12.36 21:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
It's not up to you to "not have a problem granting you the additional six days". Some deletions stay open for months while the research is done and an administrator can make a decision. Leaving this image here until the research can be done and a decision made is not a problem, it's a matter of consensus from the community. Also as a Commons user, you do not implement rules. You might reference a guideline or a policy to help the closing administrator, but the rules here are not individually created or enforced. Please be kinder to your fellow volunteers and assume good faith as outlined on COM:AGF. There are over 6,000 images in the backlog for Deletion Nominations, this one will be closed when it gets closed. Excessive admin-shopping and trying to push a WP:POINT, are not advised. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Portrait Picture paid by my Grandfather

My Grandfather had a picture taken of himself in 1969, picture has been in the family since then, he paid a professional photographer for it who has by now died and whose company or studio no longer exists. I would like to upload it as a replacement of the terrible picture in the current Wikipedia article. I have tried to upload hoping for an option to provide original photographer Credit for it but I find no option which would fit "This work was paid for by the person the article relates to, he should have rights to use and credit has been given." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azwikig (talk • contribs) 16:09, 10 June 2016‎ (UTC)

While you may feel that the person who paid for a work should have the copyright to it, that is typically not the case. It depends on the jurisdiction, but generally, unless there is a written contract stating that the photograph is a work made for hire, a written employment contract, or a written copyright transfer agreement, the copyright remains with the photographer or their heirs. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Is this in the U.S.? If so, say so, and someone may be able to sort this out successfully. 1969 is before the U.S. signed the Berne Convention, there might be possibilities there. On the other hand, if the country where the photo was take was a Berne Convention signatory, the unreachable photographer or his/her heirs almost certainly have the rights. - Jmabel ! talk 23:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

No, Picture was taken in Spain

While we are at it, though, you claim File:Marcelo Azcarraga Hijo Adoptivo Ciudad de Valencia.JPG as your own work. That seems very unlikely. Did you really do this calligraphy, etc.? - Jmabel ! talk 23:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I took the picture of the document which is more than 100 years old and owned by a family member, the picture itself was my own work. On the subject of the picture of my grandfather its impossible to locate the heirs of the original author...

Nybörjare på nedladdning

Hjälptexterna här verkar mest handla om hur man laddar upp bilder. Hur hittar man begriplig information om hur bilder på Wikimedia Commons får laddas ner och användas? Villkoren är väldigt svåra att förstå när det gäller hur man ska referera till källan, när man måste kontakta upphovspersonen osv. Finns det något exempel någonstans på hur man ska skriva en källhänvisning så att man inte bryter mot villkoren? Vid flera bilder står det t.ex. "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States." Ska jag då skriva exempelvis PD 1923 I klammerparentes? Men var, i en källförteckning eller i en bildtext? Och vem har glädje av den informationen? Bilden är till en tryckt bok i mindre upplaga. En annan fråga är vad som menas med kommersiell i det här sammanhanget? Ses en bok som kommersiell därför att den säljs, eller är det bara reklam som är kommersiell? Vad är det för skillnad mellan användning och återanvändning? Mycket tacksam för hjälp! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katarinita (talk • contribs) 15:20, 10 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Hej Katarinita! Information om användning av innehåll från Commons finns på sidan Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia (som tyvärr ännu inte finns på svenska). I korta drag är allt innehåll på Commons fritt att använda i vilket syfte som helst. Oftast måste man ange vem som skapat verket, ganska ofta måste man ange att verket är fritt tillgängligt under licensen som man själv nyttjar för att kunna använda verket, och ibland måste man även släppa eventuella förändringar man gör av verket under samma licens. Information om vad som gäller finns på respektive filbeskrivningssida (och eventuellt i licenstexter som de länkar till). För verk som är i allmän ägo (public domain) finns i princip inga krav, även om det är god sed att nämna upphovsmannen. Filer som laddas upp granskas inte på något systematiskt vis, så du måste själv säkerställa att vad som anges på filbeskrivningssidan verkar stämma.
Det är inte helt uppenbart, men texten "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States" riktar sig till den som laddat upp filen till Commons, så förutsatt att verket du vill använda är i allmän ägo i det land där du är verksam kan du lugnt bortse ifrån den texten.
Kommersiell användning är inte alltid väldefinierat i lagstiftningen, men en bok som säljs skulle i de flesta fall ses som kommersiell användning. När det gäller användning och "återanvändning" skulle jag betrakta orden som synonymer. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Tack för svar. Jo jag har läst de flesta sidor här men förstår ändå inte. Och t.ex. om det är ett foto av ett äldre konstverk - är det då den döde konstnären eller den nu levande fotografen som är author (som väl är samma som upphovsrättsinnehavare)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katarinita (talk • contribs) 20:32, 10 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Author/upphovsman är och förblir den eller de som har skapat verket ifråga. Upphovsrättsinnehavare är den som innehar upphovsrätten, vilket kan förändras över tid om upphovsrätten överlåts, ärvs eller upphör. Ett fotografi av ett konstverk kan ha flera upphovsmän och/eller flera upphovsrättsinnehavare beroende på det avbildade konstverkets upphovsrättsliga situation, fotografiets originalitet och lokal lagstiftning. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Where to categorise Ships built in the United States Virgin Islands?

I categorised Category:Ships built in the United States Virgin Islands‎ in Category:Ships built in the United States by state Is it correct? --Stunteltje (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have not found images of ships built there. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I think you've made a perfectly good choice. The category system is continually evolving, so no doubt someone will recategorise it at some point. Keep up the good work! Green Giant (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Help regarding Heading

There appears a word called Heading along with latitude and longitude while uploading a picture. I want to know what does that mean . Can anyone provide me some help regarding it ? The.sgr (talk) 13:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)the.sgr

See the paragraph "heading", in the section "attributes" of the documentation for the template Location. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Short answer: which way the camera is facing. - Jmabel ! talk 16:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

I do not understand why my video is being nominated for delection

My video demonstrates a method to sink 5 feet or less in distance by creating a putting stroke that makes the putter head travel along a straight line. A standard putting stroke introduces curves into the path that the putter head travels on.

I checked with the Rule of Golf, and my method is withing the rules of golf.

After searching the internet, I can find no other mention of a similar method.

I have shared this video already on youtube and have leased my video to the public.

I have no intention of marketing my putting method for short putts.

I have tested this putting method, and it is significantly more accurate than a standard putting stroke.


Reference: the name of my video is pasted directly below this sentence.

File:How to putt in a straight line from 5 feet or less.webm

Good Regards Luke Daniel Borel Kansas City Missouri

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LukeDanielBorel (talk • contribs)

Convenience link: File:How to putt in a straight line from 5 feet or less.webm. - Jmabel ! talk 16:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
As I understand it, it was nominated because someone believes wobbly video was an unsuitable format to present a series of pictures and texts (and I tend to agree). That is, they were arguing with the format, not the content. But it's no use discussing it here at the help desk. As you were told on your talk page, you can contest it in the deletion discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:How to putt in a straight line from 5 feet or less.webm, which you have not done. If you don't contest the deletion it is unlikely to be prevented. - Jmabel ! talk 16:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Image name

Resolved

Hi, I was wondering if someone could help,
There's a word that describes long-width images like this, Para something ... I know it starts with a P but I for the life of me can't think of the word,
I'm thinking of paranoia but that's clearly not it , Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Bingo found it - It was "Panorama" .... Well I was kinda ... not so ... close . –Davey2010Talk 18:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Permission image

I wonder how to know if the author of a picture on the internet or not to allowed to carry on wikimedia. --José Brasileiro (talk) 11:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Internet images. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Photos in Category:Roller coasters at Parc Astérix

Hi. Is it possible to restore some photos which would have been deleted without a proper reason ?
Almost all the categories in Category:Roller coasters at Parc Astérix were emptied by Natuur12 because of DRs launched by Elisfkc. Happily, there had been a previous positive closure to the Goudurix's DR (here), so the outcome of the second DR has been positive too. But concerning the other coasters, some photos depicted only the coaster itself and were not concerned by the lack of FoP in France ; and the categories Tonnerre de Zeus, Le Vol d'Icare, OzIris and Trace du Hourra were emptied without distinction.
Now we have lost all the illustrations for the coasters' articles on WP, is it possible to recover some of them which were free ?
Some of the images are still visible on Google : Tonnerre de Zeus, OzIris, Le Vol d'Icare. If non-free buildings are visible, they are de minimis, and the coasters are utilitarian objects.
Best regards, -- Fʊɠỉtɾoŋ ‘‘talk’’, le 14:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

If a nail clipper and a tablecloth can have a copyright in France, surely the same applies to a coaster. Nothing has been deleted without a proper reason. If the reason is unclear to you or if you don't understand the reason, you can always ask for an additional comment at the closing admins talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
· Hello. First, I'm sorry for not contacting you directly, I was a bit overwhelmed by the situation. I did nothing but assume that the closure of Goudurix's first DR was the right one, because it has been done a second time. I thought that those files were deleted without a proper reason because this reason had been invalidated on another DR, without any response of the applicant. No offence, but it is not my fault if Commons' DR system does not work well. I am from Wikipedia, and I see that files are deleted or not by admins who do not agree on the terms of deletion. So I'm going to ask on COM:VPC if coasters do get a copyright. Best regards, -- Fʊɠỉtɾoŋ ‘‘talk’’, le 15:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

I am in the USA, I understand how I can take a photograph and release it under CC and thus use it on Wiki. However I perplexed as to how I can possibly use photos of identifiable people, in private settings, (understanding they were being photographed) and yet allow that photography to be used commercially. I would, as I understand, need get a full rights release for those people, which they may not be willing to do. I am however confident I can a rights release if it is released under a CC with commercial use restricted, but not sure if Wiki accepts those. My situation is this, I have a photography of people performing a play, in a public place, but they are regonizable, I don't think there would be any problem using it for editor use with CC, but I don't see how I could use it if it were to be sold commercially. Can someone please educate me, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philip.mark.powell (talk • contribs)

You are right that this can be an issue. See Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. --ghouston (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Photos

Hello, I have a problem. I changed the name of four my photos. Before the change name of the photos showing on the search engine normally. After changing the name these photos are shown in the browser blurred. What to do? ETR (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Like this one? File:Kościół Chrystusa Króla Lędziny-Hołdunów ruchoma szopka 4.jpg It looks OK to me. --ghouston (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I mean that in the Web browser displays a blurred picture: [3] [4] [5] [6] ETR (talk) 13:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, we can't do much about what Google displays. Might be a matter of a delay in generating a particular thumbnail; if so, it will certainly sort out with time. - Jmabel ! talk 14:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

How to remove an old image on wikimedia?

Suruchi 23 (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)A very old logo of Zscaler is visible at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ZscalerLogo.png. What's the best way to get rid of this page or replace it with the current logo? ( available on www.zscaler.com)?

I think we usually want to keep old versions like that around for historical reasons. You should upload the new version as a separate file (assuming it meets the "Freely Licensed" requirement: in my opinion this is {{PD-textlogo}} so it does). You can do that by clicking "Upload file" on the bar on the left side of the screen. BMacZero (talk) 16:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I agree with BMacZero. As an encyclopedic resource, old logos are of as much interest as current ones. - Jmabel ! talk 19:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

college seal

Hello. I have a .jpg of our college seal and would like to upload it here so I can update our Wikipedia page at the request of the Chancellor. Obviously I didn't create the college seal, but I am responsible for updating the page. How should I notate ownership? Thank you. Mlwmiller (talk)

Mlwmiller: Please see Commons:Guidance for paid editors, which covers your situation. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Also, unless either your college seal is in the public domain or the institution is inclined to offer it under a free license, it is not suitable to be hosted on Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 16:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion and category “Undelete in …”

How to add speedy deleted files to the suiting undeletion category? The actual reason for asking are three recently deleted images by German photographer Franz Landgraf, cf. Category:Franz Landgraf (photographer), who died in 1953. Hence, these files could be undeleted in 2024 (If I remember correctly the license templates would have to be adapted, though). The files:

— Speravir_Talk – 18:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

You can simply add the links into the page of the "Undelete in..." category. Assuming the one from 1930 was published in Germany in 1930, it might have to wait until 2026, depending if you take into account the copyright in the U.S. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Aah, OK. For the second sentence: This is a result of these en:URAA regulations, isn’t it? Not being an admin I do not know, which date was given in the description for File:Porträt Anton Günther um 1930.jpg. — Speravir_Talk – 22:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
@Jmabel and Rimshot: You seem to be the most active admins here. Could one of you, please, take a look into File:Porträt Anton Günther um 1930.jpg, which date is given there? — Speravir_Talk – 18:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
It only says about 1930, but that's for the creation date. There is no information on publication and no useful source information either. --rimshottalk 19:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Rimshot. Judging from the other 2 files, where I’ve seen the description: Franz Landgraf was his own publisher, too, hence I would suggest to add the undelete request for 2026. (Speravir (Talk))
(Update: I did exactly this now. –Speravir (Talk) 18:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
I almost forgot this: By the way and just for the record archived original threads from German Commons:Forum: Commons:Forum/Archiv/2016/June#File:Porträt Anton Günther um 1930.jpg and Commons:Forum/Archiv/2016/June#File:Bad Guter Brunnen Zwönitz 1920.jpg und File:Muldenberger Talsperre 1926.jpg.— Speravir_Talk – 21:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Speravir (Talk) 18:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

What's different about overwrite existing file and upload as a new file?

The original version is File:Taiwan the Province Government Building.JPG. Both the "Author" line and the EXIF show Vegafish as the author, but Fcuk1203 upload a new version of File:臺灣省政府大樓.jpg to overwrite the original version. Because he think that File:Taiwan the Province Government Building.JPG is too bad quality, so new version is of far more better quality. Moreover, the uploader claim he doesn't see what would violate COM:OVERWRITE here. May I ask how this one is different? I do not understand why this file does not violate COM:OVERWRITE.--Liji (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

It is a different photo, so the overwriting by Fcuk1203 in 2013 was contrary to com:overwrite. From what I understand from the logs, you reverted File:Taiwan the Province Government Building.JPG to the photo originally uploaded in 2006 by Vegafish. After a short revert battle, Fcuk1203 left the original photo and uploaded his 2013 photo on a separate page, File:臺灣省政府大樓.jpg. Two years later, in 2015, an administrator removed the photo by Fcuk1203 from the history of the page File:Taiwan the Province Government Building.JPG and copied it to another page, named File:Taiwan Province Government Building.jpg, thus creating a duplicate of File:臺灣省政府大樓.jpg, and left a message on the discussion page of Fcuk1203 about com:overwrite, which may not have been necessary two years after Fcuk1203 had already accepted to place his photo on a separate page. A month later, File:Taiwan Province Government Building.jpg was deleted by another administrator because the photo by Fcuk1203 was already at File:臺灣省政府大樓.jpg. It seems that the whole thing was sorted out to your satisfaction a long time ago. Is there a problem? -- Asclepias (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

waiting for OTRS

Normally Id be more patient but since Ill be at Wikimania when the one month mark hits, I figure better safe than sorry. (I hope). I sent OTRS a permission letter on behalf of the Museo de Arte Popular, who emailed it to me instead of them, in reference to two videos that they produced in collaboration with Wiki Learning - Tec de Monterrey (Im the coordinator of Wiki Learning). I finally got some corrections done an both videos appear here with this message. The letter was sent 27 May. I just want to be sure there is no problem with the letter and the videos. Hate to have to upload and stuff all over again. Thanks!Thelmadatter (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please post your question at the Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Where I Can Ask for Revision Deletion?

I found the pervious versions of some images on commons may infringe copyright. Can revision deletion on commons deal with that? Where I can send revision deletion requests? Thanks. --Techyan（Talk） 07:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@Techyan: Use {{speedy|Delete the version as of HH:MM DD MONTH YYYY because it is a copyvio}} for previous copyvios. Thanks, ★ Poké95 08:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
In my experience, it is better to post a request at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, as some administrators do not read the text in the reason for anything tagged for speedy deletion and instead end up deleting the whole file. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Misspelled category

I misspelled " Category:House of Flavors Guiness Record attempt " and put the pictures into Category:House of Flavors Guinness Record attempt. I would like to have the misspelled empty category deleted. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Nominating for speedy deletion script

Is there any userscript which can add the speedily deletion templates on files in the way twinkle does on English Wikipedia? Thanks! Jim Carter (talk) 11:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Not familiar with "twinkle", but try enabling the "Quick Delete" gadget under the "Maintenance tools" section in your preferences. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Adding an image to a category

How do I add an image that is already existent in Wikimedia Commons but not properly categorized to a certain category?

Thanks, —DrashtiUnit 20:54, 19 June 2016 (CET)

If you have enabled HotCat in your preferences, you will find the signs (+) and (±) at the bottom of each image description page. You can use these to add a category (+) or replace an existing category (±). There is also a more comprehensive documentation. --rimshottalk 19:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

I uploaded a scanned logo for the GEnie online service, and am having problems picking a copyright for it. It was scanned from an out-of-print magazine (II Alive) for a defunct business. Certainly, I did not personally create the image, but there is no one to challenge it. What kind of copyright status should it have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweyhrich (talk • contribs)

There is a copyright protected photo of the Austrian right-wing extremist Norbert Hofer which is now used in several language versions of Wikipedia - Obviously there is no licence proof in the OTRS-system which clarifies the licence of this photo. Why is it not deleted? --87.155.109.194 17:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Because 30 days have not passed yet. Ruslik (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
30 days are long over. Uploaded 25th of April, unuseful permission recieved 10th of May. 30 days are definitely over. So why isn't it deleted? --87.155.109.194 18:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
It is 17 May. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. Nyttend (talk) 20:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I work for Bio-Rad Laboratories and have been assigned to monitor, edit and update our wikipedia page. The following link leads to a wikicommons image that the company founder and CEO want gone from our page. They do not give permission for this image to be used and want it gone immediately, which is their legal right. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David,_Alice,_and_Norman_Schwartz_PITT2007.jpg

Please let me know when this action will be possible to comply with copyright laws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.101.136.224 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC) (UTC)

No, that's not their legal right. There is no evidence that that photo is owned in any way by them; they merely happen to be in the picture. --Prosfilaes (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Please advise the correct legal status for this picture: Quintinia verdonii Margaret Flocton.jpg

It was a drawing done around 1910. Many other of Margaret Flockton's drawings are on commons. Such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmelina_leichhardtii#/media/File:Gmelina_leichhardtii00.jpg

How does one correctly edit the new file for an acceptable legal status?

thanks Poyt448 (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--Poyt448 (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Possibly PD-1923 + PD-Australia ? -- Asclepias (talk) 03:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

*Uploading a logo on Wiki

To whom it may concern,

I own the copyright to a logo that someone else has designed. It is unclear on Wiki's guidelines as to whether I can upload a logo that I own but have not created to Wiki. If so, is there a particular license that I need?

Best,

Mary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjhodgett (talk • contribs) 14:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC) (UTC)

  • If the copyright has been clearly transferred (written transfer) and you are willing to license it appropriately, yes, you can upload it. Do be clear who the author is, add a clarifying statement in the "Permissions" part of the Information template, and I'd recommend that you send an email as described in COM:OTRS and tag the uploaded file with {{OTRS Pending}} since this is a bit unusual and it would be good to have a clear release on file. - Jmabel ! talk 16:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

New version of an audio file doesn't replace the outdated one

Hello, I just uploaded a new (corrected) version of the pronunciation of "Franklin Delano Roosevelt" but my newer version doesn't actually replaces the outdated version (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GT_FDR.ogg). This procedure works always fine with replacing pictures, what am I doing wrong here, I wonder? Can someone teach me how to do it right (or as an admin simply delete the wrong pronunciation files) please? Thanks in advance, Alex. --GeoTrinity (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: GeoTrinity (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC): problem solved

USB Drives

Can this be put on a USB drive and taken were there is internet as I don't have in my home.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rue ree (talk • contribs)

What do you mean by "this"? Ruslik (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand the original question at all, sorry. Can you please rephrase it? Thanks. Multicherry (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Cartridge label here and here claims "Audiovisual concept, label and program (C) 1984 Activision Inc."

Am I correct in assuming that the label design (in this case) falls below the US threshold of originality as a combination of {{Pd-text}} and {{Pd-simple}} and that this claim is invalid?

FWIW, I suspect that this is boilerplate slapped onto every cart regardless of whether or not it was enforceable. I have another Activision cartridge - Kaboom - that has a definitely-copyrightable photo (and as such wasn't photographed for Commons).

Multicherry (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright: stained glass not in PD, covered by FoP — derivative work

Assuming that a stained glass is not in public domain, and it is covered by freedom of panorama, can it be safely uploaded to the Commons? How to deal with a problem of derivative works based on the photo? --Wikimpan (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

  • If it's covered by FOP (not a given and you don't say what country), I would think no problem. A lot of things that are covered by FOP (or de minimis) could theoretically have some derivative work that would not have the same exemption. - Jmabel ! talk 14:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
    • It is covered by FoP, as stated in the question. The problem I see is that if one licenses a photo of a stained glass under a licence that permits derivative works, someone could create a graphic work or even a stained glass that uses the same design, which would clearly violate original author’s rights. I believe the issue is the same as with murals, but I want to make sure. --Wikimpan (talk) 04:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich würde gerne ein paar Fotos des Kollegen user:FFA P-16 in Absprache mit ihm (sind seine eigenen Fotos) hochladen. Was gebe ich da am besten bei der Lizenz-Auswahl an?

--MBurch (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

I would like to upload pictures of my friend user:FFA P-16 (their his own works and he agrees that I upload them). Which choice I choose for the licence?--MBurch (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich bestätige das ich MBurch bevolmächtige Fotos die ich gemacht habe hochzuladen. Ich habe ihn darum gebeten da ich die Fotos momentan nicht hochladen kann (es kommt immer die Fehlermeldung "Skriptfehler). FFA P-16 (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC) I have given MBurch my permission that he can upload pictures who I had made. I asked him for this because right now it is for me not possibel because of a software error. FFA P-16 (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

  • For the record, neither Zweifach AMRAAM Werfer 01.JPG nor File:Zweifach AMRAAM Werfer 01.JPG has ever existed on Commons, so I'm not sure I understand the section header. - Jmabel ! talk 20:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Your friend -- FFA P-16, I assume that is you -- as the copyright-holder, is the one who must grant the license, not you. You can't upload based on vague permission to use the photos, your friend needs to grant a specific license (although you can assist by drafting an email for your friend to send). If in doubt, personally recommend CC-BY-SA as retaining as many rights as are congruent with placing a photo on Commons. Please see COM:OTRS for what is needed. - Jmabel ! talk 20:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Jmabel, I did as you recommended.--MBurch (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

@Jmabel I made this pictures last friday and saturday when I was visiting the 75years Meiringen AFB. I made the photos (there are more than this 3) by myself with my own camera (ca 130 photos videoclips) and my own mobilephone (98 photos/short video clips). I tried first to upload some of them it here. But then was thisscript errorprobem. So I asked MBurch for help. I sendet him a few pictures via e-mail. FFA P-16 (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

I think the problem is solved on a other way. I managed today to upload a few pictures. So it looks like I can my self made pictures upload by my self here. FFA P-16 (talk) 22:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

No subject

Мой файл P1011078_Изображена_эволюционная_спираль.JPG удален ВАНДАЛОМ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Павлова Светлана Владимировна (talk • contribs) 08:03, 25 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Если вас не устраивают условия, то вы должны прекратить пользоваться этим сайтом. Ruslik (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Charles Dolan

I'm trying to upload this picture of Charles Dolan, but I don't know its status.

http://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/04bf8bc05f398814c72260b756b2fc5a/320x486.jpg?fit=scale&background=000000

JerrySa1 (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I assume you didn't take the photo, and I see no reason to think it would be in the public domain. It does not belong on Commons without the permission of the copyright holder. - Jmabel ! talk 18:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Author's signature

I usually put my sign / name in my photographs, shall i upload it with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iam manoJeyaraman (talk • contribs) 19:32, 26 June 2016‎ (UTC)

See COM:Watermarks. Short answer: we prefer that you don't. BMacZero (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I've recently become interested in structural engineering and so I am editing related entries. I've become interested because I work for a company that makes structural products. My questions is, can I use photos from our website given that I agree to the terms and conditions of the company on the website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob mcauley7 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 24 June 2016‎ (UTC)

  • Might require a release be sent to COM:OTRS from organization saying contributions are authorized. Commons is not Wikipedia so the conflict stuff doesn't apply over here. --dsprc (talk) 10:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright help regarding File:Bow Bridge in Central Park NYC 1 - August 2009 HDR.jpg

I would like to use this file in my article on Adrian Janes whose company helped create the bridge. If there is one of Rainbow Bridge available in Wikimedia Commons, I would like help in locating it.

--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Do you mean the Bow Bridge? There's the category Category:Bow Bridge (Central Park). -- Asclepias (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Please use the image which is not scheduled for deletion, File:Bow Bridge in Central Park NYC 1 - August 2009 HDR.jpg is the one to use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Ack, I didn't even read the heading, just the sentence where she said "Rainbow Bridge". I know the Bow Bridge well... Sorry. - Jmabel ! talk 01:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich habe soeben ein Dokument aus einem behördlichen Vorgang von 1986 hochgeladen, welches ich über das Umweltinformationsgesetz von der NRW-Atomaufsichtsbehörde erhalten habe (THTR-1986-Heske.pdf). Es handelt sich um Details zu einem Störfall im Reaktor THTR-300 vor 30 Jahren. Auf Einsicht in das Dokument hat gemäss UIG jedermann kostenfrei Anspruch. Daher gehe ich davon aus, dass ich es auch verbreiten darf. Ist das richtig ? Das Dokument, dessen Inhalt - ausser über UIG-Anfrage, s.o. - nicht zugänglich ist, ist z.B. für den Artikel THTR-300 wichtig.--Rarian (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I wish to upload the official logo for the 2016 All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship (https://www.google.ie/search?q=all+ireland+senior+hurling+championship+logo&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq69mcpsrNAhVHDMAKHUTVDhQQ_AUICCgB&biw=1745&bih=890#imgdii=qy6HQfQgGj_DcM%3A%3Bqy6HQfQgGj_DcM%3A%3Brvt5YFfrJXukCM%3A&imgrc=qy6HQfQgGj_DcM%3A)

It comes from here (https://centra.ie/live-well/gaa)

I'm not exactly sure what the situation is regarding copyright and licenses etc. and I'm confused by the uploading process and the instructions. I have uploaded it, but I was told it may be removed. Thanks for any help you can give.

--Leanseahy (talk) 08:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

We don't seem to have any information on what the threshold of originality required for copyright protection in Ireland is, but apparently, typographical arrangements are protected, so I'm afraid we have to err on the side of caution and assume that the logo is protected by copyright. There is no indication at the source site or at http://www.gaa.ie that the copyright holder has published the logo under a free license or released it into the public domain, which means it can't be hosted here. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to understand what you can and cannot upload to Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

how to solve missing essential sources

hey buddy i created and its entirely my own work File:Garowe montage.jpg but it says missing essential sources , and i have seen this previously — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullsaed (talk • contribs) 14:48, 28 June 2016‎ (UTC)

Please understand that grabbing other people's non-free photos from the Internet and pasting them together does not make them your own. This montage contains https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HO_I9xaPCpw/maxresdefault.jpg (gragbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO_I9xaPCpw), https://www.flickr.com/photos/26064548@N06/2538818800/ and http://sanaagpost.com/spost/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/DSC_0752.jpg (grabbed from http://www.sanaagpost.com/2014/12/imtixaanka-kamadambaysta-ah-ee-semesterka-1aad-ee-sanad-jaamacadeedka-2014-15-oo-ka-bilowday-jaamacada-puntland-state-university-sawirro/). Presumably the rest are copyright violations too. Considering the number of copyright violations you've uploaded, you can expect your account to be blocked soon. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

WIKI LOVES EARTH 2016 INDIA CONTEST

Hi

To upload a picture with relevant information am I supposed to put the info below the image as a caption? What is the critical information needed? What is the checklist for uploading to be followed? Ajay Chandwani — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJAY CHANDWANI (talk • contribs) 10:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in India, I suppose. Maybe contact the organizer to answer here? — regards, Revi 15:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Which is the word "四草" is correctly spelled "Sicao" or "Sihcao" in the Wikimedia Commons?

Even in official period, the status of Tongyong Pinyin in Taiwan is quiet different from Hanyu Pinyin in China. The Taiwan (official name:Republic of China) government only uses it as an romanization system of place names. However, there's currently a problem:

It has already been fully replaced with created a new category, and especially the statement of Pbdragonwang on the talk page, because the word is spelled "Sicao" are quoted from an official interpretation of this website. Therefore, he thinks the word "Sicao" is standard spelling of a Chinese name in Hanyu Pinyin, and the word "Sihcao" is spelled incorrectly!

I found some information on this in a Google search here. For guidance in Modern Chinese pinyin as required by 標準地名譯寫準則, 音譯 does not mean "Hanyu Pinyin" or "Tongyong Pinyin", it really means "Pinyin Transcription". That is to say, it means the Taiwanese Mandarin language names have been transcribed from Taiwanese Mandarin to Romanization characters and then into English. I'll let you read pages like en:Transcription (linguistics), en:Romanization of Chinese and en:Chinese language romanization in Taiwan so that you can understand it better.

In the Wikimedia Commons, should it be spelled "Sicao" in Taiwan or "四草" in the official pinyin system of Taiwan with named?--Liji (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure how to properly reference the photo of former NFL quarterback Bob Lee that I copies from the Minneapolis Star Tribute.

When I simply searched for Bob Lee NFL Quarterback, the preview on Google showed the correct Wiki page for Bob Lee but a photo of a different Bob Lee from the 1800's so I thought I would add a correct photo of Bob Lee, the former NFL player who attended my alma mater University of the Pacific.

Thanks, Jim

--Jdugoni (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk/Archive/2016/06&oldid=226102145"