User talk: Paine Ellsworth
My talk page on Wikipedia.
Notes from Ellsworth to Paine:
- Help desk, advice on renaming files and Category:Elise Weber
- {{Resolved}} plus several others in See also section
Welcome!
[edit]
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
{{File:Benjamin_Franklin_by_Joseph_Siffred_Duplessis_left.jpg}}69.110.212.87 20:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Deferred to higher issue – Paine Ellsworth (talk) 03:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]Add categories |
---|
This is an archived notice; please do not modify it. |
Hello, Paine Ellsworth!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them. Here's how: 1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense: 2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets". When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
|
{{File:HollyMarieCombs02.jpg}} --Tabercil (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
{{tl|Talkback|Tabercil|HollyMarieCombs02.jpg}}
Paine Ellsworth (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
{{File:Napoleon Hill 1957.jpg}}--VernoWhitney (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Countersuit
[edit]Ref.: User:Dcoetzee/NPG legal threat
If not already in the works, perhaps it is time to consider these charges as defamatory? And not only toward Wikimedia F. and the individual, who were initially victimised by yet another unconscionable act by the British against Americans (I believe minor skirmishes aside, this all began in the eighteenth century), but also those like myself. I have no feel for how many of us there are, but I'm surely not the only one who has committed yet one more "act of treason" against the Empire of England, am I? My crime was, purely for reasons of proper formatting, to download one of the images in question, switch the horizontal orientation so the subject would be facing in the opposite direction, and then upload my new rendition of the image to Commons. There was an almost immediate reaction to delete the image, not on a copyright vio, but just because such things shouldn't be done. Eventually, it was allowed that it wasn't a problem as long as it's mentioned in the the image caption. Thus far, the only places this image is linked are the correctly oriented image and my Wikipedia User page. The image in question is File:Benjamin Franklin by Joseph Siffred Duplessis left.jpg, and I would be more than happy to participate in any class-action countersuit that may arise in this most recent "war of independence".
Paine Ellsworth (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you do launch a defamation lawsuit are you going to do it in the UK where the law re: defamation is generally recognised as plantiff friendly and rather strong or the US where given the 1st Amendment and stuff like that it's generally considered defendent friendly and rather weak. Also I'm confused about what the suggestions of (I presume) wikipedians many of whom I'm guessing were Americans instead of the NPG to delete an image because they didn't agree with flipping it has to do with anything related to the other stuff you're discussing. Nil Einne (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, to launch a defamation suit is not really my style. To support a defamation suit, and/or to defend myself in a lawsuit if necessary, is moreso my style. If you are familiar with what I was rambling on about (see User:Dcoetzee/NPG legal threat), then you know that this is really about the fact that that user originally uploaded the Ben Franklin image. I suppose it was my unlearned and goofish attempt at satire to include myself in the proceedings just because I uploaded an altered image of Ben. You see, it wasn't the suggestions to delete the image, but the suggestion by British law that Dcoetzee had done something wrong by uploading those photos that I was on about. Hope this clears it up for you, and thank you very much for your response! Paine Ellsworth (talk) 13:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token d726bb56c78651484428f103292fb89a
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
(Be still, my heart!>) Paine Ellsworth (talk) 15:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Billy the Kid Headstone.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- If I could have used the tool, I would have. It didn't work. CH2 and a couple of other tools wouldn't work either, so I had to do it manually. I'll check it to see what I did wrong. Thank you for letting me know! Paine Ellsworth (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- PS I've used the tool before, which is why I now have a toolserver uid and password (see above).
- The Toolserver has been picky recently, so try the version on Wikimedia Labs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, MtO! If I run into a picky toolserver again, I'll give it a shot – or did you mean I should use the version on Wikimedia Labs as primary? Paine Ellsworth (talk) 23:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't being that specific. If the one on Labs is more reliable, then go with it. And vice versa. I haven't used the Labs version enough to say which is better. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, MtO! If I run into a picky toolserver again, I'll give it a shot – or did you mean I should use the version on Wikimedia Labs as primary? Paine Ellsworth (talk) 23:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- The Toolserver has been picky recently, so try the version on Wikimedia Labs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Paine Ellsworth,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Benjamin Franklin by Joseph Siffred Duplessis left.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)