Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Pine Trees screen
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pine Trees screen, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2013 at 17:30:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Pine Trees screen (Shōrin-zu byōbu) left hand screen and right hand screen, created by Hasegawa Tōhaku - uploaded by Bamse - nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Love the pine forest in the fog. Not a big fan of the excessive resolution, though. It just brought my computer to a screeching halt. Kleuske (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- I guess this is the first time an image doesn't get its well-deserved support because of too high resolution... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's a first time for everything. Even resolution can be excessive. If you want to show something, crashing all but the most well-endowed computers does not help. Kleuske (talk) 10:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- For featured pictures more detail is better. If you need a smaller version you can use the previews or request someone to make a smaller version that doesn't freeze your computer. --Pine✉ 07:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's a first time for everything. Even resolution can be excessive. If you want to show something, crashing all but the most well-endowed computers does not help. Kleuske (talk) 10:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support I love the touch of the drawing and the delicacy of the texture on the frame, and they are viewable only with this fine resolution. --whym (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 10:23, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 04:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support The level of detail is excellent. --Pine✉ 06:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)06:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info Low resolution version. --Laitche (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support also good --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support No hesitations. Kleuske (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 04:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I strongly prefer higher detail versions when we can get them. --Pine✉ 06:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media