Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Palestine Rally: End The Siege, Stop the War on Gaza

Palestine Rally: End The Siege, Stop the War on Gaza, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2024 at 10:07:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
• 
• 

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info created by Matt Hrkac - uploaded by A1Cafel - nominated by Natsuikomin -- Natsuikomin (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Natsuikomin (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I don’t think this counts as a valid set under the FPC guidelines, but I shall not oppose in case this is interpreted as a revenge vote. Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

  If I nominate these individually, would it be okay or is there something wrong with its content? Natsuikomin (talk) 13:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

• I would oppose the first two because there are problems with the composition, the first one has a large out of focus area, the second has a blurred girl walking off the edge of the frame and isn’t particularly interesting anyway. The third is better composed. But I think the best of this photographer’s images of this protest is this because the composition is better, the sign is more interesting than in the third image you nominated and gives a sense of the context of the protest, and the expressions on the faces of the protestors, + the raised fist, add something. Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Perhaps not bad as documentary, but I don't see anything featurable, especially not as a set. Sorry. --A.Savin 12:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

  Please explain what you meant by featurable? Natsuikomin (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not a set. Nothing special in composition. I have no idea what Commons rules are on political statements. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Neutral The last picture is FP for me. ★ 13:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The first one is not FP, so not a set anyway. Yann (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not as a set. The last one has potential, it looks like a focused and informative picture. --Thi (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

  Yes! @Natsuikomin: please, nominate this picture solo instead! ★ 01:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

  I would like to second that, Natsuikomin – please nominate the third one. --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not as a set; only 2 and 3 have potential. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Since 7th October, how someone can dares to bother normal people with supporters of Palestine terorists, which with no reason have attacked to Israel, massacred innocent civilians and killed babies in oven?! As a Czech, I stand with Israel, which is only defending itself against islamictic attempts genocide of Jews. Sorry about that guys. But this post opset me. --Phoenix CZE (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

• Hi Phoenix CZE, please use {{oppose}} or just {{o}} to vote against a photo, not {{delist}}. This could confuse our bot. No offence, I just want to help. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
• a) The world's not always as "black and white" as you may be thinking. b) Any other reason to oppose apart from political ones? --A.Savin 13:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's not a set. The first is obscured by the unfocused foreground, the 2nd is just mediocre photo of a crowd on the street. The third one is closest to FP, but the placard is only focused part of the photo and the rest of the photo doesn't give any additional value. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 09:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)