Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:1957 Maserati 450S - fvl.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:1957 Maserati 450S - fvl (edit).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2013 at 21:03:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Rex Gray - uploaded by SocCarpassion - nominated by SocCarpassion -- SocCarpassion (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- SocCarpassion (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support VolodymyrF 19:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, {{{1}}}Resolution is below required 2 megapixels --Kadellar (talk) 22:25, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Not the typical surroundings for this car but a wonderful image. The small resolution should not be an important lack. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose We have some rules and guidelines, and there is no mitigating circumstances (in my opinion) to break them in this case. The size is too small.--Jebulon (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per low resolution. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Too simple, but it is a pity, as I like it. Yann (talk) 06:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose 2 MP rule--Telemaque MySon (talk) 11:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I really like it, but it is unfortunately too small of an image to be an FP. Michael Barera (talk) 23:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Alt
[edit]- Info A bit more brighteness, sharpness and higher contrast. Resolution is higher but still under required 2 MP. However I hope that it will be alright.--SocCarpassion (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution is not higher at all. I think you mean filesize, which doesn't really matter as I see no JPEG artifacts in the original. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results: