Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2017 at 11:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Thailand
Info created by PumpkinSky - uploaded by PumpkinSky - nominated by User:PumpkinSky, note some insect removals were done by User:Michielverbeek back on 16 April 2017. -- PumpkinSky talk 11:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Full disclosure: This image was previously nominated at FPC back in late April 2017. I did not have Lightroom back then and have now learned to use it. The first nomination can be seen here, but it's pulling up the current photo version, not the April version. Prior photo versions can, of course, be viewed in the file history. PumpkinSky talk 11:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Support -- PumpkinSky talk 11:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but to me it looks overprocessed and not quite sharp. Could be a VI, though, since it's better than the other images in the category.--Peulle (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Support Daphne Lantier 18:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Lack of detail in the bricks, color noise in the sky, and what's with that weird little square up near the top center? I think Peulle is on to something. Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment @Daniel Case: I've fixed the box--don't know where that came from--probably a stray click; and worked on the sky and bricks. If you think it is salvaageable from this point, please let me know what to work on; if you think it's not salvegable please let me know that too. I wish I knew about RAW back then. PumpkinSky talk 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Over processed. The original suffered from poor lighting. That's not easily fixable for colour images as the results tend to look artificial. The sky is starting to show some colour posterisation in the grey clouds from being pushed. The brickwork and leaves are too contrasty. I see some odd adjustments in the EXIF. For example, this is an ISO 100 image, so I wouldn't expect much if any NR yet we have strong luminance and colour NR. With a Sony sensor there's usually very little reason to touch the colour NR slider unless one has extreme ISO values. Some colour saturation/hue adjustments seem quite extreme too. Best to keep those adjustments modest -- were you trying to make an overcast sky blue? -- Colin (talk) 22:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment @Colin: Yes, I was trying to get the sky blue. It sounds like this isn't fixable so I'll withdraw it. PumpkinSky talk 23:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination PumpkinSky talk 23:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: