Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 21:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)- Support Belles perspectives!!! -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support ---MehdiTalk 07:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support wow, great view. Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Lighting is harsh, dark shadow in the mid-section -- Dey.sandip (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)- Support --Karelj (talk) 20:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice view, but I dislike the shadow. If the geocode is correct, it was taken towards north-east, so 14:00/15:00 would've been optimal. In full view, again, it looks rather soft. Unfortunately, it's often a problem with your photos, no idea why. --A.Savin 21:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- I like them that way, I don't sharpen (anyone can do it). Thanks for your comment --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support In my opinion Wow! there is. Really a great view. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose -- As per above + composition unspectacular.Fotoriety (talk) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support Really neat perspective and wow factor outweighs the problems for me. —Mono 18:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose --Yes, the pov is really nice but per A.Savin the image is soft (specific to lens?) while there are post-processing problems: left quarter of the sky is posterized and there are white halos in several areas of high contrast. Sting (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Pottercomuneo (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dey.sandip --Laitche (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support The shadow adds to the relief, and the lighting gives a surreal atmosphere --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support wow!--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Joydeep Talk 07:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong banding in left area of the sky, oversharpened and very tight composition around the upper edge. It's a pity because the resolution and the subject are amazing. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- What I believe you consider banding is the pattern of the clouds that day. I have it on several pictures taken that moment. The sharpening is really a matter of taste. I don't like it either (anyone can do it after downloading the picture) but many reviewers keep asking for it... Thanks for the review anyhow --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Wolfgang, I have to agree with Julian. Color banding is there, imho it could be fixed with denoising the sky. But the main problem for me is oversharpening. --Ivar (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
