Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stairs at Du Loup.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Stairs at Du Loup.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2015 at 21:49:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pel Laurens - uploaded by Abigor - nominated by Abigor -- Huib talk Abigor @ meta 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Huib talk Abigor @ meta 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Neutral Artistically I like it, but it's rather overexposed in most of the brighter areas (not just the 'obvious' flat areas, but look at the detail on the top of the post at the bottom of the left-hand stair). I'm not going to 'oppose' as I'm not a FPC regular, but I don't think it would really be 'usable' at higher resolutions because of the burned in areas. Revent (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose like Revent - Artistically - yes, encyclopaedic - no way. just stairs. sorry, D kuba (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- D kuba, this is Commons, not Wikipedia. There's no requirement to be encyclopaedic. We have an educational scope but this can be very widely interpreted, including images of "just stairs" taken artistically. -- Colin (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose This image might have worked if it was better technically -- it is rather soft/noisy. As a b&w photo the shape of the staircase is emphasised and it is permissible to have extremes of contrast (including blacked-out and blown areas) that wouldn't be accepted in colour. But I'd like to also see the detail in the flooring pattern and ironwork. -- Colin (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just as a 'technical comment', taking the same image with a polaroid filter would probably have helped significantly in that respect. Revent (talk) 11:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
