Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prag, Nationalmuseum, Brunnen -- 2019 -- 6841.jpg

File:Prag, Nationalmuseum, Brunnen -- 2019 -- 6841.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2019 at 05:55:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Prag, Nationalmuseum, Brunnen -- 2019 -- 6841.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prag, Nationalmuseum, Brunnen -- 2019 -- 6841.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Czech_Republic
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 05:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support wonderful idea --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Hmmmmm very good. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Works for me, althoug a large part of the image is of course out of focus --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 08:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it on the whole but I'm not sure it's FP for me. I am not sure it's sharp enough, and I find the composition a bit awkward with the crops at the sides. Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 18:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose tilt, extreme distortion, composition --Wilfredor (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Creative -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I got to agree with Wilfredor here. -- Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 01:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support It seems tilted, but it is apparently an optical illusion. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support It feels like the focus point is too low resulting in a too blurry statue, but still a very nice view overall, FP to me. Not much you can do about the "distortion" in this kind of shot. In fact that distortion is what makes the image interesting to me. Poco² 09:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Creative composition* well executed. That kind of "distortion" (converging verticals) needs to be there in this kind of frog perspective shot. Same as these converging horizontals, just rotated by 90° … --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC) *By our standards. I'd bet that this kind of shot would be part of "composition 101" in any photography class

• +1 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 00:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Wilfredor. Daniel Case (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture