Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karersee HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Karersee HDR.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2009 at 20:21:31
- Info created by afrank99 - uploaded by afrank99 - nominated by afrank99 -- Afrank99 (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Afrank99 (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Tired time (talk) 09:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Zuffe (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose, and why exactly was HDR necessary for this picture? Rather unsharp, and a bland composition. --Aqwis (talk) 09:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Because there is too much contrast (dark trees - light mountain and sky) to be captured in one single exposure. I can easily reduce resolution to 2 MPixels to make it sharp, if you want me to. --Afrank99 (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The guidelines is against reducing resolution. /Daniel78 (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment sure, but it doesn't make sense to complain about poor pixel-level sharpness when there is plenty of image resolution. --Afrank99 (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- This guideline is bullshit. --LC-de (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The guidelines is against reducing resolution. /Daniel78 (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Because there is too much contrast (dark trees - light mountain and sky) to be captured in one single exposure. I can easily reduce resolution to 2 MPixels to make it sharp, if you want me to. --Afrank99 (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like it --kaʁstn 11:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral Very impressive but bad quality at the edges -- Ukuthenga (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose The technical flaws kill it for me. Distortions, unsharpness and due to the HDR processing the sky has an unnatural and weird brightness gradient. --LC-de (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral En principe, a great image, but the unsharpness is just unpleasant. Booksworm (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose as LC-de. Lycaon (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose LC-de said it better than I could. Maedin\talk 11:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)