User talk:Julia W

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Maedin)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Thank you

[edit]

Thanks for the discrete and nice work you have been doing in linking our FP to their nomination pages! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Nice to know it's appreciated, :) Only a few hundred more to go... Julia\talk 12:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recently I struggled, with no success, with the redirect of a commons nomination to an alternative version. I can't remember the picture but maybe you can give me some general advice. One of the problems was to find the right initials for Commons in the Assessments template: "comwiki-nom=" ? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is com-nom=example.jpg. However, this only works if "File:" is not included in the parameter. If you happen to be trying to link to a nomination page titled Image:example.jpg, it simply won't work (or at least, I've not got it to work yet!). Julia\talk 12:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Psathyrella ammophila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scelophysa trimeni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
In appreciation of this beautiful photo and all the others you've contributed. INeverCry 00:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oooh, great, thank you!  :) Julia\talk 12:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

image use

[edit]

Dear Julia, I am currently doing the layout of a Schoolbook for french in Austria and would like to use your picture from a metro sign there. Your name would be mentionned as the author of course.

Greetings from Austria,

Hadwig Soyoye-Rothschädl soyoye@freiraum-landschaft.com

:en:FPC

[edit]

Hi Julia o/,

First of all, thank you for writing, you are very kind lovely. So yeah, I've been working lately on getting good pictures, I have visited forests days away from civilization and I've been in altitudes over 5000 meters above the sea level. Taking pictures is one of my passions, throw like paragliding and climbing, I hope to travel to the remotest parts of the Amazon soon. For me, it is a great pleasure, a user like you, with so much level contributions and receive this compliment.

I hope you can apply for a scholarship for the next Wikimania and so I share ideas with you. --The Photographer (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cat for u

[edit]
This cat needs lowering, I leave to your care, the cat needs to eat healthy

--The Photographer (talk) 02:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

[edit]

Welcome back, Julie!

After all, I realize that you have been around for some time! But I haven't noticed, maybe because you changed your username. Now for this bee shot. I'm afraid it doesn't have a chance at FPC, hélas! The main problem is the overall unsharpness, mainly due to the shallow dof. A different issue is the harsh sun lighting, causing all those ugly reflections and affecting the detail. Lighting is indeed the most difficult problem in macro, especially when our subjects and alive and nervous! One way around is to shoot the beasts in early morning (a terrible sin for me), use long exposure and, even better, focus brackteing. But that is for experts like Richard! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was very windy that day, which affected all of my attempts - obviously including this one! I thought the specular highlights might also be a problem - African sun is terrible for it. Thank you very much for sharing your opinion, and for the welcome! I appreciate it.  :) Abraços, Julia\talk 15:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julia, do you noticed that this file is still in a dispute at [1] and [2]; so it may be better editing it later. JKadavoor Jee 14:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had no idea that discussion was on-going about this image. Thanks for letting me know about it. I don't feel that it was incorrect to make the edit though. It's been protected so I can't remove my edit now. Julia\talk 21:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK; my only intention was to inform that matter. JKadavoor Jee 14:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. The featured picture Burrow Mump.JPG, which was produced, uploaded, or nominated by you, has been nominated for delisting and/or replacement. Please view that page to vote or comment on the discussion. — TintoMeches, 22:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I've voted. Julia\talk 08:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Cape honey bee

[edit]

Hi Julia. I am writing a book on beekeeping in Australia and am including a chapter on bees that are found outside of Australia. I plan to include an entry on the Cape Honey Bee and would like to use your excellent photograph in my book. Can you let me know if you are OK with this. I will of course fully attribute the photograph to yourself.

Thanks in advance

Robert robert at owen.org.au Melbourne

Hi Robert, of course I'm happy for you to use my photo in the book. I've sent you an email with more details - please check your spam/junk folder in case it gets filtered. Julia\talk 21:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Julia W,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South facade of Lyme Park house, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some flaws: The building is leaning to the left side. One disturbing bird (see annotation); all of them easy to fix. --Cccefalon ✓ Done Thanks, should be okay now. The tilt was tricky because the building is not straight and square at all! Julia W 12:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 23:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Very good now! --Cccefalon 13:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

That's a beautiful picture; congratulations on receiving Quality Image status, and thanks for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! odder (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's also Commons' best picture of Lyme Park (well, there is some competition from this picture. Could I persuade you to nominate one or other as a Valued image? Nev1 (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Curfew Tower, Windsor Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Julia W,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn Town Hall Square, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Norbert! On the English Wikipedia we recently promoted one of your images and it is now a featured picture. Here's the pic: File:False turkey-tail - Golden curtain crust - Stereum ostrea - 02.jpg and here's the nomination Featured picture candidates/Stereum ostrea. Sasata is regarded as something of a fungi expert and he disagrees with the identification of this as Stereum ostrea. He thinks it is S. hirsutum because it grows in Europe and looks almost identical, while S. ostrea does not grow in Europe. What do you think about changing the identification of this image to S. hirsutum? Julia\talk 20:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julia, I'm not really a fungi expert, so if your expert says,the photo shows S. hirsutum, please feel free to change the file description and file name accordingly. Sorry for the wrong assignment. BR Norbert -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This FPC nomination on en.Wikipedia needs a closure, but I can't do it as nominator. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! :) Julia\talk 19:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:South facade of Lyme Park house, 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South facade of Lyme Park house, 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiffel Tower from north Avenue de New York, Aug 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North rose window of Notre-Dame de Paris, Aug 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! --Uoaei1 18:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Métro de Paris, Iéna station, totem Val d'Osne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 05:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards Pont Saint-Michel from Pont Neuf, Aug 2010, v.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now! --DXR 09:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female reclining on driftwood on the beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes, I think it's okay now. --DXR 13:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robber fly, South Africa, 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formby Beach panorama, July 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

[edit]

Hallo Julia W,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File:Twintowers of Deutsche Bank Headquarter in Frankfurt a.M..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 06:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all of the behind-the-scenes work you do with FP (and I know I’ve recently given you a lot)…--Godot13 (talk) 07:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, Godot, I really appreciate you giving me this. It's lovely that someone has noticed! And yes, you've certainly been busy. :p I'll get more done within the next couple of days when I have time. Cheers! Julia\talk 18:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I asked for delisting: Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg. The attitude is funny, but the quality and the size is very far from the actual standard. Sorry. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saul Bellow, 1990.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Saul Bellow, 1990.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

-- Cirt (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:3D printed owls at the YouMagine stall.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:YouMagine sign and 3D printed items.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

[edit]

Hallo Julia W,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

John Phillip Sousa

[edit]

Hello Julia,

I would like to use the picture of John Phillip Sousa as he would be a distant cousin to me through my great grandmother's side of the family. I was wondering if it would be alright to use the photo in my genealogy and to have it colorized?

Thank You so very much.

John A. Myers

You can contact me at clovrboy1@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.233.197.20 (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Julia W, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
salut 👍 Ramiiiiiiiii 08:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

[edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pontifex maximum Workman

[edit]

Hi the workman McNaughton crest of lictors fasces of st Joseph the Workman was used on his son James the just first Christian church Pella Jordan 69ad later by Geoffrey LA Guerche (wirce) monks Kirby priory ,cult of st Nicholas templars , thanks. John Workman of Gloucester NSW cuz

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]