Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2016 at 07:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created & uploaded by User:Poco a poco - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support - An unusual mosque photo and particularly beautiful at full screen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Though it is so very nearly 16:9 that I'd recommend a crop to that. -- Colin (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Will take care of that tonight, Colin Poco2 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- It took me longer, but
Done now, Colin Poco2 21:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- It took me longer, but
- Will take care of that tonight, Colin Poco2 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support lNeverCry 08:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --cart-Talk 09:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Cool pic :) Thank you Ikan for this nom!! Poco2 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks for taking it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --The Photographer 11:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Another lovely abstract Iranian ceiling (Not sure from the window above if it's tilted or it's the window, though ... seems to be the latter). Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Question The sky is gray or brightness was artificially lowered? --The Photographer 10:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, The Photographer, that grey due was due to a too strong highlights reduction, I have moderated it. --Poco2 20:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer, I will keep my suppor vote --The Photographer 20:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
. --Mile (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Oppose Got some questions on pic, see notes. Also think is very gray inside, and maybe right side could be enlightened a bit more if RAW is available
Support A windows. I think is much better then before. --Mile (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Mile: What does RAW stand for? never heard of that. :) Those openings are not showing directly the sky, I think that there was a kind of cover. I have brightened the right dome and reduce the highlight compensation --Poco2 20:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- This improved the picture, but did it really look like this, or did it look more like what you had before? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan, I applied the change because I believe that it does look now more realistic than before, otherwise I wouldn't have applied it. In general this kind of changes should not be applied to make it look nicer but closer to reality. Poco2 07:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reassurance. I totally agree with that, but I think you can understand why I asked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Support --Claus 08:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings