Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dehrn Lahnbrücke02circcropedit 2011-05-21.jpg/2

File:Dehrn Lahnbrücke02circcropedit 2011-05-21.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 14:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dehrn Lahnbrücke02circcropedit 2011-05-21.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dehrn Lahnbrücke02circcropedit 2011-05-21.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a renomination, as this image failed in October 2012 with 6:0:0 votes.
•  Support as nominator -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice reflection, I like this composition. --Laitche (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but I think it would fit better among Quality Pictures. The picture really isn't extraordinary to be named as one of the best pictures in Commons. I fail to see this picture competing with something like this, this, this or this and so on. -- Pofka (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 18:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI for me. Not one of our best bridge reflection pictures IMO; the lighting could be improved, and the crop on the two sides could be wider. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per King of Hearts, also tilted counter-clockwise. — Julian H.^✈ 13:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark, per King. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Info New image version uploaded, vertically aligned. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment "crop could be wider" distracting objects just outside of image area; "too dark" image already exposed to the right -- KlausFoehl (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The colors look a bit faded, I am not sure because there is no metadata but reprocessing from the RAW with sRGB workflow might be improving light and the colors, imho. --Laitche (talk) 23:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Photos taken in 2011 with Canon A610, no RAW available. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For king --Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)