Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Daniela Danz, Fokus Lyrik 2019 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Daniela Danz, Fokus Lyrik 2019 02.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2020 at 03:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Kritzolina - uploaded by Kritzolina - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Excellent portrait. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Info Gallery fixed. You need to really check out and find the exact gallery and section since the FPCBot is now sorting pictures automatically. Go to the gallery page and copy the page name and heading to get the spelling right. For more info see this. --Cart (talk) 08:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Totally agree with Frank, --Cart (talk) 08:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support The fine details (especially hair & lips) look quite mushy, possibly due to in-camera noise reduction. But a screen size it looks alright, although I feel the urge to play around with different options for the crop. Otherwise, I agree with previous comments. --El Grafo (talk)
- Support Good expression, nice clean background. El Grafo is right but it is still FP level to me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The lighting is good, but the technical problems are huge. All details are hidden in mushy areas, so to me this is no FP. --Granada (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but imho quality (lack of details) is not up to our FP level. --Ivar (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ivar, the area around the lips is definitely below the bar, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ivar --Cvmontuy (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others, although still very useful photo. --A.Savin 02:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Notably blurred below the nose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical issues aside, I just do not find this among our best portraits. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ivar. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)