Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg

File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2016 at 16:19:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info Citizen wristwatch, front side. Done on acrylic glass (for reflection), in softbox, two lights on both side. My work. --Mile (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Just wondering on do you also have a version shooted on a small angle so that both watch and mirrored image is visible... Kruusamägi (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's fine as is, due to the feeling of simplicity this composition brings. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Great job! Is it on glass? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Question The metal parts on both sides seems overexposed. It bring the attention too. As a studio setup, does the light intensity can be more controlled? I maybe wrong as I've no experience in making such setups. Jee 03:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
• Kruusamägi i have that option too, just in RAW and not done. But when i saw, i couldnt get composition i want, simply all bottom isnt my option, unless, i debright bottom much more. Will have to see, i got another watch in that case, but will see. Here it didnt work for me - white is too strong. Ikan Kekek; acrylic glass - they have black and white for such stuff, reflection. Je; true, some is burnt. Metal, lights, more angles → count on that. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Pierre André (talk) 09:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support well done! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 11:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support after reading Mile's reply. Jee 11:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Joalpe (talk) 11:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Blown reflections are normal with metal objects. It will look odd if you PP to get rid of them. Samsara (talk) 13:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 13:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong support So good I expect to see it used in one of the company's ads within the year ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 17:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects