Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babosa de mar (Flabellina babai), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-26, DD 22.jpg

File:Babosa de mar (Flabellina babai), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-26, DD 22.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 06:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Babosa de mar (Flabellina babai), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-26, DD 22.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babosa de mar (Flabellina babai), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-26, DD 22.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
•  Info Sea slug (Luisella babai), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. It is present in the Mediterranean Sea, the Adriatic Sea and it has also been reported from the Atlantic coasts of Spain, Portugal and Senegal. It inhabits rocky bottoms at depths of 5 to 50 m. It can reach a length of about 30–53 millimetres (1.2–2.1 in) and they feed on hydroids. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Flabellinidae/Samlidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Ermell (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 08:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry but the subject is not sharp at all, and the whites are a bit overexposed El Golli Mohamed 13:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

• I guess, I have to assume again that this has nothing to do with my last vote in one of your noms. This is getting boring. We are talking here about a tiny animal shot underwater and still there is more detail here and in some current FPCs Poco a poco (talk) 08:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

  I remember you that it's just a comment not a vote so don't tell me please about your last vote. This is boring. An underwater photo doesn't mean an unsharp photo, not well exposed. You did good sharp underwater photos that I supported as FP. This one is not a good quality. Try to fix it. If Ermell for exemple voted against your photo that you nominated today for QI, that means that it's in relation with an old vote? It's simply because your photo has not a good quality. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not good enough for featured picture --Lupe (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality is not the best. Wolverine XI 19:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support The sea slug may not seem very sharp at first glance, but comparing other photos I doubt that it can look sharper – most parts of this creature’s surface are obviously rather smooth. Looking at photos with lower exposure, I also cannot spot additional details in the bright part. Therefore it seems not unfavourable that the bright parts of the sea slug are very bright in this photo, and I really like how the creature seems to shine here. Considering the general difficulties of underwater photography, and comparing again other images of this species, I think this one is worth to be featured. – Aristeas (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support The quality can be improved --Zzzs (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 19:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda