Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A unique frame of Humayun Tomb, Delhi.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:A unique frame of Humayun Tomb, Delhi.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 20:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
- Info created and uploaded by Thesolorover - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Another very impressive shot from WLM in India -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The log. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Quite poor quality. Particularly visible in the sky. The verticals are wrong on the right side. There's CA at the left. Colors are weird. The foreground doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would support with a perspective correction. The log makes this interesting. Yann (talk) 10:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose because I don't like the log blocking the tomb. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin and Ikan Kekek --Sandro Halank (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose An interesting idea, as the filename suggests, and I don't blame the photographer but as all the other !votes make clear this just does not work (and it's not just the composition). With no supports beyond the nominator in five days, this nomination has no chance of passing at this point and it is past time for the nominator to withdraw it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support As per above it has no chance of passing, I agree, but I thought FPX was supposed to be used for photos that were clearly and obviously below the standard of FP or that were copyright violations. I don't think this falls into either category. The quality is a little on the low side and the colours don't seem quite right but I like the effort at an original composition, the motif is beautiful and the detail is sharp - this is a long way from an iPhone or Android pic that has no pixel-level detail and would deserve an FPX. I don't think it's perfect but I'd be happy to see it on the main page. And we have already had one other voter saying they would support if a change were made - again suggesting this does not fall into the 'so irredeemably bad it deserves to be FPXed' category. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per the template's own documentation: "Please use it only where the nomination has no chance of success and where there are no existing support votes other than the nominator's" (Emphasis in original). Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 17:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)