Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Нейрохирургическая операция в Институте Склифосовского.jpg

File:Нейрохирургическая операция в Институте Склифосовского.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 19:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Нейрохирургическая операция в Институте Склифосовского.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Нейрохирургическая операция в Институте Склифосовского.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info Neurosurgical surgery to remove a brain metastasis at the Sklifosovsky Institute (Moscow) / Created by Sklifosovsky Insitute - uploaded by Sklifosovsky Insitute - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Question A staged promotional shot? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Sklifosovsky Insituteitute is the main trauma center of a city with a population of 10 million people, there is no time to take staged photographs, you can see other shots uploaded by this author and make sure of it))) JukoFF (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose As a photo of neurosurgery, it completely fails unfortunately. We can't even see the patient, never mind any actual surgery taking place (if indeed there is any, per Charles' question above). BigDom (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Are you sure it's ethical to show a patient whose head is being cut open? Maybe don't answer that is a rhetorical question) JukoFF (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Like Ikan says, it definitely could be ethical, consent is the key. Maybe if the photo were presented as simply surgeons at work, I could understand, but when the title says neurosurgery and the description says brain metastasis, but we can see neither, then it just doesn't work for me, I'm sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that it fails as a photo of neurosurgery, per BigDom, but it succeeds as a composition and has drama. It's really a photo of medical staff who are conducting neurosurgery, not a photo of the surgery or the patient. As for whether it would be ethical to show a photo of the patient: Yes, but only if they were asked and signed a release form before the operation, while they were still clear-headed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Heroes at work :) 20 upper 09:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support A little bit of CA on darker areas surrounded by light, but otherwise per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work