Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Makeup tutorial - Time Lapse.webm
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Makeup demonstration - Time Lapse.webm, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2019 at 04:22:03
To visit the nomination page click here.
File location
- Description : Make up demonstration time lapse
- Category: Commons:Featured videos/Time-lapse
- Info created by Ksenia Pechinina - rest by Eatcha -- Eatcha (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Eatcha (talk) 04:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment suggest to re-name it to something like File:Makeup demonstration - Time Lapse.webm or similar. From a en:Tutorial I would expect some kind of voice-over (or at the very least some text on the screen) that explains what is being done, why it's being done like that, what techiques and materials are being used, etc. Not sure I would support this as a demonstration/time lapse as it looks a bit soft at full screen. But as long as it's being passed of as a tutorial I feel compelled to oppose. Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 08:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Personally, I prefer a silent tutorial than one in a specific language (English, Polish, or why not Nepali), since it makes the video more international. Anyway, it seems that the word "tutorial" has now been renamed into "demonstration" -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
NeutralI am neutral on this. -- 105.71.1.29 13:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- IPs cannot vote, sorry. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Willing to be convinced, but to me this style doesn't seem amenable to an educational video. There's insufficient narration/text to explain what's going on, so we just see really fast hands/brushes/whatnot flying by. It's a style I'd expect to see if watching an actor transform for a role, where the "how" isn't as important as the overall effect. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral I am neutral on this. -- Ermell (talk) 09:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Eatcha (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Eatcha (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2019 (UTC)