Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2022/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-11-15 23:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) ventral

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 02:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg: +2
=>
File:African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-12-18 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Zizeeria knysna (African grass blue) underside

 Support Much better indeed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg: +2
=>
File:African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:African grass blue (Zizeeria knysna) underside Principe 2.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 13:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-21 13:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster
Scores: 
1. ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: 0
2. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: Declined.
File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Pleiades large.png: -1
=>
File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted.
File:Pleiades large.png: Declined.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
ToBeFree (talk) on 2022-01-08 23:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Messier 45 – Pleiades star cluster
Reason:
The original file is a 49.1 MiB TIFF ([1]). I have downloaded it and converted it to a lossless PNG using imagemagick. The current Valued Image (.jpg) was promoted 31 December 2008 (1.99 MB JPEG). Recompressing to a quality-100 JPEG, however, takes over 20MiB, and even this isn't lossless. So the current Valued Image is a very lossy JPEG that can be replaced by this lossless PNG. -- ToBeFree (talk)
  •  Oppose The JPG is slightly but noticeably sharper at review size. I don't understand why I can't edit its entry here to support, but considering that this is VIC, how lossy an image is when viewed at larger sizes is irrelevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Pleiades large.png: -1
=>
File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted.
File:Pleiades large.png: Declined.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Dimorphic or Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female dorsal

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) dorsal

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose The greater part of the butterfly is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Of course it is not a perfect image. Still valuable for identifying the species. Remember, I could say for many VIs of views: 'The greater part of the xxx is not visible' Charles (talk) 10:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think images with basic technical defects should not receive any awards. VI is not QI, but there are some borders of quality that should be taken into account when evaluating images. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image is not of a landscape or immobile building. Charles (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This may have a sharpness issue, but it's the best we have currently. I don't think the sharpness issue is damaging to the EV too much either. The butterfly is still clearly and easily identifiable. lNeverCry 18:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: +2
=>
File:Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-17 20:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa lycoa (Dimorphic acraea) female dorsal
Scores: 
1. Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: +2
=>
File:Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope) male dorsal

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-11-29 13:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea alciope (Hewitson's acraea) dorsal

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Hewitson’s acraea (Acraea alciope) male.jpg: +1
=>
File:Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Hewitson’s acraea (Acraea alciope) male.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-17 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea alciope (Hewitson’s acraea) male dorsal
Scores: 
1. Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Hewitson’s acraea (Acraea alciope) male.jpg: +1
=>
File:Hewitson's acraea (Acraea alciope).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Hewitson’s acraea (Acraea alciope) male.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Commerzbank Tower

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
—Percival Kestreltail (talk) on 2020-03-01 03:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Commerzbank Tower
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Frankfurt Am Main-Commerzbank Tower vom Rathenauplatz-20100808.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Commerzbank Tower Frankfurt.jpg: +1
=>
File:Frankfurt Am Main-Commerzbank Tower vom Rathenauplatz-20100808.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Commerzbank Tower Frankfurt.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
—Percival Kestreltail (talk) on 2022-02-06 23:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Commerzbank Tower
  •  Comment The color difference looks minimal to me and is probably because the first photo is backlit. As for the shape... we're merely looking at it from an adjacent side, so the spire is now on the opposite side of the building. Not much else looks out of place to me. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Frankfurt Am Main-Commerzbank Tower vom Rathenauplatz-20100808.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Commerzbank Tower Frankfurt.jpg: +1
=>
File:Frankfurt Am Main-Commerzbank Tower vom Rathenauplatz-20100808.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Commerzbank Tower Frankfurt.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Carinapex minutissima

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-02-20 18:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Carinapex minutissima, shell

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Carinapex minutissima 01.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: +3
=>
File:Carinapex minutissima 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2022-02-22 07:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Carinapex minutissima, shell
Reason:
Meanwhile I got a much better specimen --Llez (talk) 07:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC) -- Llez (talk)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Carinapex minutissima 01.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: +3
=>
File:Carinapex minutissima 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

"Speyerkreuz" in Trier Eurenerstraße 1820

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-01-16 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1820), so-called "Speyerkreuz" in Trier, Eurener Straße.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Trier Speyerkreuz Eurenerstraße 1820.jpg: -1(current VI within same scope) <--
2. Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: +2
=>
File:Trier Speyerkreuz Eurenerstraße 1820.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Trier Speyerkreuz (1820).jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2022-05-16 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1820), so-called "Speyerkreuz" in Trier, Eurener Straße.
Reason:
Better lighting and sharpness. -- Palauenc05 (talk)
Scores: 
1. Trier Speyerkreuz Eurenerstraße 1820.jpg: -1(current VI within same scope) <--
2. Carinapex minutissima 02.jpg: +2
=>
File:Trier Speyerkreuz Eurenerstraße 1820.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Trier Speyerkreuz (1820).jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-05-19 09:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus (Large fairy hairstreak) male ventral

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male underside.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male 2.jpg: +1
=>
File:Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male 2.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-18 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus (Large fairy hairstreak) male underside
Scores: 
1. Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male underside.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male 2.jpg: +1
=>
File:Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Large fairy hairstreak (Hypolycaena antifaunus antifaunus) male 2.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-31 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Eicochrysops hippocrates (White-tipped blue) underside
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) underside.jpg: +1
=>
File:White-tipped blue (Eicochrysops hippocrates) underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) underside.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-18 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Thermoniphas micylus micylus (Common chalk blue) underside
Reason:
previous VI incorrect id -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Scores: 
1. Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) underside.jpg: +1
=>
File:White-tipped blue (Eicochrysops hippocrates) underside.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Common chalk blue (Thermoniphas micylus micylus) underside.jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi)

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-31 15:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Cacyreus lingeus (Common bush blue) underside
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Common bush blue (Cacyreus lingeus) underside Principe.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi).jpg: +1
=>
File:Common bush blue (Cacyreus lingeus) underside Principe.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi).jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: promoted in other category -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-01-19 14:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cacyreus audeoudi (Bright bush blue) underside
Reason:
id of existing VI incorrect. Apologies. -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Scores: 
1. Common bush blue (Cacyreus lingeus) underside Principe.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi).jpg: +1
=>
File:Common bush blue (Cacyreus lingeus) underside Principe.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Bright bush blue (Cacyreus audeoudi).jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)