Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Support B&W surely has its pros and cons. Regardless of that, I think it's still the best image within that scope. Also note that all but one Wikipedia articles on the subject use this one as their opening image. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The weather is better and u can see the frontage in the natural colour. Furthermore the windows set oneself apart from the sky and the frontage and the other windows. All in all a more explicit view of frontage.
The actual VI has some little stitching errors and has to rotate to the left side (arround 0,5 degree). -- Dr. Chriss (talk)
Noteː There is already VI of this category, i show the nomination on the next candidation.
Question any other reviews neeeded or can the vote closed? Like the voting above "Most valued review candidates" takes a lot of time and there are some more MVR̠'s which have to reviewed and if we would sort out this voting there would be the focus on the other MVR's. --Dr. Chriss (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]