共享資源:管理员

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

此页解释了管理员（有时叫做admins或者sysops）在维基共享资源上的职责。请注意，此职务的的细节，以及授予管理员权限的方式，可能与其他项目不同。

如果你需要管理员的帮助，请移步管理员公告板。

现时在维基共享资源上有182 名管理员。

什么是管理员？

Administrators as of 2月 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 182 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1 99of9, en (bureaucrat) A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2 Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1 Abzeronow, en, fr-1 Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2 AFBorchert, de, en-3 Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 Aka, de, en-3 Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1 Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2 Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1 AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1 Anthere, fr, en-3 AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward) Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3 Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1 Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1 Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1 Billinghurst, en Blackcat, it, en-3, fr BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1 Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1 Captain-tucker, en Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2 Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1 Common Good, en CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat) Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1 Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1 Czar, en DaB., de, en-1 DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1 Davepape, en DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward) Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3 DMacks, en Didym, de, en-2, fr-2 Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1 D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1 Ebrahim, en-3 Elcobbola en, de (checkuser) Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat) Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1 Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1 Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat) Explicit, en, es, ko-2 Ezarate, es-3, en-1 Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2 FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1 Gbawden, en-3, af-1 Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1 Geni, en George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1 Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3 Gnangarra, en, nys-1 GPSLeo, de, en-2 GreenMeansGo, en Grin, hu, en-3, de-1 Hekerui, de, en-4 Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1 Hesperian, en Holly Cheng, en, ja-2 Huntster, en Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2 Infrogmation, en, es-1 IronGargoyle, en, de-1 Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Jaqen, it, en-2 Jarekt, pl, en Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1 Jdforrester, en Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1 Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2 Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1 Joergens.mi, de, en-3 JoKalliauer, de, en-3 Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward) Josve05a, sv, en-3 Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1 Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2 Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1 King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1 Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1 Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2 Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1 Léna, fr, en-3, es-1 Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1 Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2 Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1 Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1 Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 Marcus Cyron, de, en-2 Masur, pl, en-3, de-1 Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1 Matrix, en, ta-2 MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1 MBisanz, en Mdaniels5757, en, es-1 MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1 Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1 Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1 Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1 Minorax, en, zh (oversighter) Missvain, en Mitchazenia, en, es-2 Miya, ja, en-2 Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1 Morgankevinj, en MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1 Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1 Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1 NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1 notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2 odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter) P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1 Pi.1415926535, en, es-2 Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1 Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1 Podzemnik, cs, en-2 Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1 Pyb, fr, en-2 Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1 Racconish, fr, en-4 Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1 Ra'ike, de, en-2 Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1 Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3 Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter) Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1 Regasterios, hu, en-1 Rehman, en, si-1 Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3 Revi C., ko, en-3 Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1 Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1 Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1 Royalbroil, en, es-1 RP88, en, de-1 Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2 Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1 Sadads, en, es-3 Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1 Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1 Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1 Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1 Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1 Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2 Strakhov, es, en-2 TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2 Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1 Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1 The Squirrel Conspiracy, en Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1 Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2 Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1 Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1 Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1 VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1 Wdwd, de, en-2 Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3 Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1 Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1 Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1 Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1 Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1 Yuval CT, he, en-3 Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1 علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward) Abuse filter, (automated account) CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request KrinkleBot, (bot) see request If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

技术

技术上，管理员在维基共享资源上有以下权限：

• 删除和还原图像及其他上传的文件，并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
• 删除和还原页面，并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
• 保护页面和解除对页面的保护，并可编辑保护级别为“仅允许管理员”的页面。
• 封禁和解封用户，进行IP地址（或IP段）的封禁。
• 編輯沒有太多限制的的界面訊息（參見界面管理員）
• 重命名文件。
• 添加和删除用户组。
• 配置上载向导。
• 彻底删除和还原特定页面的日志和历史版本。
• 从其他项目导入页面。
• 合并页面历史。
• 修改防滥用过滤器。
• 移动页面时不创建来源页面的重定向。
• 无视欺诈检查。
• 一次将一条消息发送给多个用户。（群发消息）
• 在API查询中使用更高的上限。

这些统称为管理工具。

社群角色

管理員是維基共享資源社群內有經驗的可信用戶，負責進階維護工作並且經公眾討論或投票已獲授權使用管理工具。不同的管理員有著不同的興趣和專長，但典型的管理員任務包括決策並關閉刪除請求、刪除版權違規、必要時恢復檔案、反破壞保護維基共享資源以及在模板和其他受保護頁面上作業。當然，其中有些工作也可以由非管理員完成。

管理員被期望瞭解是項目的目標，並準備著與其餘有志人士一同做出建設性的貢獻。管理員理應瞭解並遵守指引政策，在合理時尊重社群共識。

除去需要使用管理工具的時候，管理員由於個人立場不同並無特殊編輯權限，在討論或公開投票內，他們的貢獻被看作與其餘任一普通編者相同。一些管理員可能會變得更有影響力，這不是因為他們的管理員地位，而是因為他們從社群中獲得了對其個人的信任。

對管理員的建議

請詳閱管理員手冊。

移除管理员权限

根据管理员离任方针，如果管理员不活跃或者滥用管理工具，权限会被解除。 在管理员解任请求中，不适用参选管理员时判断共识的标准。而应当是使用“多数共识”，即超过50%的用户达成解任共识即可解任管理员。

申請成為管理員

所有有意願成為管理員的使用者必須經過這個過程，自薦至申請成為管理人員，包括那些想重新上任的前任管理員。

首先，前往Commons:Administrators/Howto並閱讀那裏的資訊。隨後返回並在下方的段落遞交申請。

• 點擊正確的按鈕並建立子頁面後，複製鏈接到子頁面。例如，"Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", 將 Commons:Administrators/Requests 粘貼到文段最頂部, 然後用兩個括弧包围起來 (例如 {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} )以嵌入。可以在MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice上申请一个全站监视列表通知，或者如果你是管理员，可以编辑MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice张贴通知。

• 如果他人提名閣下，請以陳述「我同意（I accept）」或是其餘類似字樣來接受，並在提名下方簽名。子頁面仍然需要被您或是您的提名人嵌入。

使用下方的方框，並將"Username"替換成您的用戶名。

投票

任一註冊用戶都可以在這投票，不过那些很少甚至沒有編輯過的人的票可能不會被計算在內。閣下最好在 Support或 Oppose時都給予理由，這能幫助行政員更好地做出决策。有支持理據的論證會比簡單的投票更被看重。

上任管理员通常需要75%的支持率，并至少需要有8人同意。来自未注册用户的投票将不被计入。不管怎样，关闭个案的行政员可以自行考虑社群共识，最终决定并不只基于原始数据。如果行政员认为需要更好地确定社区共识，可以酌情延长投票的时间。

由于需计算成功或失败率， Neutral投票将不被计入投票总数。然而，这些评论是讨论的一部分，并可能会说服其他人，还有助于关闭个案的行政员更好地了解社群共识。

清除缓存使用下方的编辑链接来编辑嵌入后的页面。

申请成为管理员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

申请成为行政员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

申请成为用户查核员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Yann

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship)

• Checkusers/Requests/Yann
• Checkusers/Requests/Yann 2

Vote

Yann (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 06:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Dear community,

today I would like to nominate Yann to be the next checkuser for Commons.

It appears that the most active CU for the last years, Elcobbola, is currently inactive, and I have the impression that there is some need for more hands. Per my personal perception Yann is currently the most active admin in CU releated areas. They have been CU already from 2007 to 2009, and appear to be consistently active in the last two years.

Yann has agreed in private to accept the nomination.

Thank you, yours, --Krd 06:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Krd for this nomination. I accept it again, and I would be glad if I could help. Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 07:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --— Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per my and other comments at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship). DrKay (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral Though he could get things done, I’m concerned the inactive CU called him the singular worst admin on the Commons and routinely demonstrates ignorance of and disregard for policy [sic] in the link above. I’m interested to hear how they feel now, though from the looks of it, that is not possible right now. 1989 (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

  Full disclosure: this commentator is also involved, per their comments at the de-adminship discussion. Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Support he is OK modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 15:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

  i checked discussions about this and my suggestion to yann is please do your work with consedaretion of community's concerns(bad english sory). you are hard working user. we are here voluntary, dont burnout. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 15:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Support — Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC).
•  Oppose per Brianjd's first bullet point. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I trust Yann. And he has the checkuser experience already. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral per 1989, and the inactive CU has previously had to confron Yann on when CU checks can be performed. This does not bode well, but Krd's nomination statement lays the problem out pretty clearly: we need another CU. Whether Yann is the person to fill that role? I don't know. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 03:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per my discussion in the comments section. Brianjd (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral - not sure where I exactly belong. While I agree that Yann is experienced and I have had good time with them, but the issues raised are equally concerning. I am staying neutral. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 06:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Aafi. --TenWhile6 11:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like Yann. He's very active and very responsive. Having said that, my issue is that checkuser is a right that requires buy-in from the community, e.g. trust, and reading through the comments here I'm not sure he has that trust. Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose "Checkusers are highly-trusted administrators..." - seeing the comments here, maybe not. —kallerna (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support trusted admin Bedivere (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support, No concerns.--Kadı Message 22:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
• Strong  Support --— Fit India 16:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support While Yann and I often disagree on the status of some images, I trust him completely to use the CU tools appropriately. The CU team can certainly use an experienced CU who has shown the willingness to put in long hours. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I've been on the fence because, when it comes to advanced permissions, I trust the people in the role to know who the best candidates are. Krd nominating Yann counts for a lot, but so does Elcobbola's historical opposition. Jim being on board is enough to push me into support. I am slightly concerned though that, should this pass, two of the CUs are bus criticalities (Commons will have a very hard time absorbing their workloads should either retire). I'd like to see 4 or 5 CUs so that krd and Yann have more room to breathe. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  I too have been thinking about this. I think it would be great if some relatively newer admins (with a good tenure both as admins and users) put themselves forward for the role. --Ratekreel (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Always a strong  Support for Yann. Trusted & experienced contributor for over a two decade. Kind regards, Tulsi 24x7 13:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jakubhal 19:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support There are undoubtedly several points of disagreement that I could find regarding Yann's contributions. However he is very involved and experimented experienced . But the more important, two members of the CU's team, who are both very experienced and trustworthy support this candidacy. I support that. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Christian Ferrer：​ Did you mean ‘experienced’? Brianjd (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

  • @Brianjd：​ English is not my native langage, isn't it the same thing? Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

    You did use the word ‘experienced’ in the third sentence. I missed that. The second sentence says ‘experimented’. To ‘experiment’ means to try something, as in a science experiment. The word ‘experimented’ does not make any sense in this context. I’m not an English teacher; someone else might be able to explain better. Brianjd (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

    • Thanks you, I fixed it, it is because in french we can literally use "expérimenté" in both senses. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Trustworthy admin. I'm confident that Yann can be a good CU. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Due to the issues other people have raised. Although I'm on the weak side since I don't really see him abusing the checkuser right like he seems to love doing with the normal administrator privileges. Really, he should just be desysopped. The project would certainly be a lot better off if he was. That's a discussion for another time and place though. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• The votes section above has already raised concerns from the de-adminship discussion. Since those concerns are being discussed anyway, I also mention the following:
  • Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Unacceptable threats by Yann: A discussion from this year where another admin and I listed such threats.
  • Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Mirror_Selfie_of_erect_penis_with_removed_pubic_hair.jpg: An even more recent discussion about an incident involving me, where the candidate both formed a wrong conclusion based on non-public information and expressed that conclusion in a poor way, making me look bad.

In both cases, the candidate addressed some of the underlying deletion/undeletion issues but failed to acknowledge any communication issues. Even worse, in the first discussion, the candidate said:

Big LOL. This is supposed to be a joke, but your sense of humor is quite obviously lacking... Do you have anything serious to say? Otherwise, please stop wasting my time and others'.

It is the second case that I find particularly concerning, since the community depends on checkusers to carefully analyze very non-public information and carefully communicate their conclusions. I was tempted to vote oppose on that basis, but I want to see more discussion first. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

You deserve credit for participating in this discussion, and for clarifying the meaning of my struck out quote.

But your response also clarifies something else: you insist on continuing your petty dispute with Andy Dingley, while ignoring the real issues here. Brianjd (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above I linked directly to the diff by you, with your signature. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:

• Per my contribution to the ‘unacceptable threats’ section, you gave an unnecessary ‘last warning’ to a new user who had already improved their behavior after previous warnings. (That section also raises other serious issues that you have not acknowledged either. One of those issues is an unjustified accusation of incivility together with an unjustified threat of a block, both made towards a fellow admin! I have not looked at the other issues closely.)
• Per the subsequent section about the erroneously closed undeletion request, you falsely implied that I had knowingly requested undeletion of a recent naked picture of a minor.
• Per the comments above, you seem to have falsely attributed your own negative comment to Andy.

Also, the fact that you have not even acknowledged the complaints described above is itself one of my complaints. Brianjd (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I don’t give a damn about this ‘God is busy’ thing. I didn’t realize that my struck out quote was actually about that. (I would be more worried about the template {{Busy}} at the top of your talk page, but actually, you do respond swiftly to most queries, to the extent that you respond at all. So that is one good thing I can say about you.) Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding here. I mistaken read "Minor" for "Mirror". I am sorry that you thought that I had accused you of anything.

When I talked about negative comments by Andy Dingley , I mean the ones they made there. I didn't attribute my comment to Andy.

Leyo said that I threatened them linking this. I don't see any threat there. OK, I deleted this file shortly after tagging it. A regular DR would have been better, but I still think it is too complex to be on Commons without a VRT permission.

I tagged File:Finnischer Eishockeyverband logo.svg with missing permission, and the DR created by Andy Dingley is still open. The Squirrel Conspiracy also thinks that is should be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

In view of all this, it seems to me that the complain raised by Leyo here lacks substance. In addition, the complain by Andy of the same page (which includes the ‘God is busy’ thing) looks like a bad faith attempt to criticize me.

I am always ready to apologize and/or revert my actions when necessary. I am more aware than anybody that, on a multilingual and multicultural project like Commons, some misunderstandings and disagreements can ready become big conflicts. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Regarding the undeletion request, I appreciate the belated apology.

Regarding Andy, I linked to the discussion as a whole, then later linked to your comment specifically. When you referred to my link, you were not clear about which one. So yes, there was some misunderstanding. I don’t think that was anyone’s fault.

Regarding the threat to Leyo, I accidentally linked to the revision prior to the correct one. The correct revision was Special:Diff/987704578, where you threatened Leyo, a fellow admin, with a block. Anyway, the correct link was already provided at the ‘unacceptable threats’ discussion.

Regarding the two files whose copyright status is in dispute, I have not looked at them closely, so I currently have no specific comment. I note that files that are considered copyright violations are often deleted immediately, regardless of tags or even discussions. I also note that these two files form context for the next issue.

Regarding the ‘last warning’ to Xgeorg, do you have any comment?

You have not acknowledged my complaint about the ‘last warning’ to Omar.idma. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

• This is not a major issue in itself, but since we are digging up a lot of old discussions here, it would help if you maintained your talk page archives correctly. Your archive links only go up to archive 61, but you now have 63 archives. Brianjd (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Yann (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

申请成为监督员

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

参见

• 用户访问等级
• 管理员不活跃部分
• 管理员布告板