Commons:Adminisztrátorok

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Ez a lap az adminisztrátorok (röviden adminok) Wikimédia Commonson betöltött szerepéről szól. A jog és megadása különbözhet a más wikiken megszokottól.

Ha admininsztrátor segítségére van szükséged, akkor az admininsztrátorok üzenőfalára írj.

Jelenleg 182 adminisztrátor van a Commonson.

Kik az adminisztrátorok?

Administrators as of február 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 182 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1 99of9, en (bureaucrat) A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2 Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1 Abzeronow, en, fr-1 Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2 AFBorchert, de, en-3 Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 Aka, de, en-3 Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1 Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2 Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1 AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1 Anthere, fr, en-3 AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward) Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3 Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1 Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1 Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1 Billinghurst, en Blackcat, it, en-3, fr BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1 Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1 Captain-tucker, en Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2 Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1 Common Good, en CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat) Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1 Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1 Czar, en DaB., de, en-1 DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1 Davepape, en DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward) Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3 DMacks, en Didym, de, en-2, fr-2 Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1 D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1 Ebrahim, en-3 Elcobbola en, de (checkuser) Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat) Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1 Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1 Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat) Explicit, en, es, ko-2 Ezarate, es-3, en-1 Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2 FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1 Gbawden, en-3, af-1 Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1 Geni, en George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1 Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3 Gnangarra, en, nys-1 GPSLeo, de, en-2 GreenMeansGo, en Grin, hu, en-3, de-1 Hekerui, de, en-4 Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1 Hesperian, en Holly Cheng, en, ja-2 Huntster, en Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2 Infrogmation, en, es-1 IronGargoyle, en, de-1 Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Jaqen, it, en-2 Jarekt, pl, en Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1 Jdforrester, en Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1 Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2 Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1 Joergens.mi, de, en-3 JoKalliauer, de, en-3 Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward) Josve05a, sv, en-3 Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1 Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2 Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1 King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1 Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1 Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2 Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1 Léna, fr, en-3, es-1 Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1 Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2 Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1 Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1 Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 Marcus Cyron, de, en-2 Masur, pl, en-3, de-1 Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1 Matrix, en, ta-2 MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1 MBisanz, en Mdaniels5757, en, es-1 MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1 Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1 Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1 Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1 Minorax, en, zh (oversighter) Missvain, en Mitchazenia, en, es-2 Miya, ja, en-2 Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1 Morgankevinj, en MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1 Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1 Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1 NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1 notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2 odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter) P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1 Pi.1415926535, en, es-2 Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1 Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1 Podzemnik, cs, en-2 Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1 Pyb, fr, en-2 Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1 Racconish, fr, en-4 Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1 Ra'ike, de, en-2 Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1 Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3 Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter) Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1 Regasterios, hu, en-1 Rehman, en, si-1 Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3 Revi C., ko, en-3 Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1 Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1 Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1 Royalbroil, en, es-1 RP88, en, de-1 Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2 Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1 Sadads, en, es-3 Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1 Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1 Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1 Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1 Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1 Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2 Strakhov, es, en-2 TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2 Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1 Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1 The Squirrel Conspiracy, en Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1 Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2 Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1 Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1 Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1 VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1 Wdwd, de, en-2 Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3 Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1 Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1 Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1 Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1 Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1 Yuval CT, he, en-3 Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1 علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward) Abuse filter, (automated account) CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request KrinkleBot, (bot) see request If 182 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

Technikai szempontból

Az adminisztrátorok a Wikimédia Commonson az alábbi technikai képességekkel rendelkeznek:

• fájlok törlése és visszaállítása, valamint törölt változatok megtekintése
• lapok törlése és visszaállítása, valamint törölt változatok megtekintése
• lapok védelme és a védelem feloldása, valamint a csak adminisztrátorok által szerkeszthető lapok módosítása
• felhasználói fiókok, IP-címek és IP-címtartományok blokkolása és a blokkok feloldása
• a kevésbé védett rendszerüzenetek szerkesztése (lásd még: Commons:Felületadminisztrátorok)
• fájlok átnevezése
• jogosultságok adása és elvétele
• feltöltésivarázsló-kampányok beállítása
• wikiközi importálás
• laptörténetek összefésülése
• vandálszűrők módosítása
• lapok mozgatása átirányítólapok létrehozása nélkül
• a hamisításszűrő felülírása és a cím- és felhasználói feketelista módosítása
• tömeges üzenetküldés
• magasabb limit API-lekéréseknél

Ezeket együtt nevezzük admineszközöknek.

Közösségi szerep

Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.

Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.

Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.

Javaslatok adminisztrátorokra

Kérjük, olvasd el a Commons:Guide to adminship lapot.

Adminisztrátori jogok visszavonása

Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools.

In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.

Jelentkezés adminisztrátornak

All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.

First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.

• After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.

• If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.

Az alábbi dobozban a „Username”-et cseréld ki saját felhasználónevedre:

Szavazás

Minden regisztrált szerkesztő szavazhat, azonban a kevés, vagy semennyi szerkesztéssel rendelkező szerkesztők szavazatai nem feltétlenül számítanak ugyanolyan súllyal. Lehetőség szerint mind a támogató, mind az ellenző szavazatok mellé írj indoklást, így segítve a lezáró bürokratát. Nagyobb súlya van egy – szükség esetén tényekkel alátámasztott – érvelésnek, mint egy puszta szavazatnak.

Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.

 Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.

Gyorsítótár kiürítése Kattints a lenti szerkesztés hivatkozásra a beillesztett lap szerkesztéséhez.

Jelentkezés adminisztrátornak

watch

A teljesített kéréseket a Commons:Administrators/Archive lapon archiváljuk.

• Kérjük, hogy a szavazás előtt olvasd el a Commons:Adminisztrátorok lapot. A kevés vagy nulla szerkesztéssel rendelkező felhasználók szavazatait nem számoljuk össze.

No current requests.

Jelentkezés bürokratának

watch

A teljesített kéréseket a Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive lapon archiváljuk.

• Kérjük, hogy a szavazás előtt olvasd el a Commons:Bürokraták lapot. A kevés vagy nulla szerkesztéssel rendelkező felhasználók szavazatait nem számoljuk össze.

No current requests.

Jelentkezés IP-ellenőrnek

watch

A teljesített kéréseket a Commons:Checkusers/Archive lapon archiváljuk.

• Kérjük, hogy a szavazás előtt olvasd el a Commons:IP-ellenőrök lapot. A kevés vagy nulla szerkesztéssel rendelkező felhasználók szavazatait nem számoljuk össze.

Yann

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship)

• Checkusers/Requests/Yann
• Checkusers/Requests/Yann 2

Vote

Yann (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 06:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Dear community,

today I would like to nominate Yann to be the next checkuser for Commons.

It appears that the most active CU for the last years, Elcobbola, is currently inactive, and I have the impression that there is some need for more hands. Per my personal perception Yann is currently the most active admin in CU releated areas. They have been CU already from 2007 to 2009, and appear to be consistently active in the last two years.

Yann has agreed in private to accept the nomination.

Thank you, yours, --Krd 06:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Krd for this nomination. I accept it again, and I would be glad if I could help. Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 07:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --— Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per my and other comments at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Yann (de-adminship). DrKay (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral Though he could get things done, I’m concerned the inactive CU called him the singular worst admin on the Commons and routinely demonstrates ignorance of and disregard for policy [sic] in the link above. I’m interested to hear how they feel now, though from the looks of it, that is not possible right now. 1989 (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

  Full disclosure: this commentator is also involved, per their comments at the de-adminship discussion. Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Support he is OK modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 15:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

  i checked discussions about this and my suggestion to yann is please do your work with consedaretion of community's concerns(bad english sory). you are hard working user. we are here voluntary, dont burnout. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 15:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Support — Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC).
•  Oppose per Brianjd's first bullet point. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I trust Yann. And he has the checkuser experience already. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral per 1989, and the inactive CU has previously had to confron Yann on when CU checks can be performed. This does not bode well, but Krd's nomination statement lays the problem out pretty clearly: we need another CU. Whether Yann is the person to fill that role? I don't know. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 03:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per my discussion in the comments section. Brianjd (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral - not sure where I exactly belong. While I agree that Yann is experienced and I have had good time with them, but the issues raised are equally concerning. I am staying neutral. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 06:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Aafi. --TenWhile6 11:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like Yann. He's very active and very responsive. Having said that, my issue is that checkuser is a right that requires buy-in from the community, e.g. trust, and reading through the comments here I'm not sure he has that trust. Bastique ^{☎ let's talk!} 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose "Checkusers are highly-trusted administrators..." - seeing the comments here, maybe not. —kallerna (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support trusted admin Bedivere (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support, No concerns.--Kadı Message 22:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
• Strong  Support --— Fit India 16:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support While Yann and I often disagree on the status of some images, I trust him completely to use the CU tools appropriately. The CU team can certainly use an experienced CU who has shown the willingness to put in long hours. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I've been on the fence because, when it comes to advanced permissions, I trust the people in the role to know who the best candidates are. Krd nominating Yann counts for a lot, but so does Elcobbola's historical opposition. Jim being on board is enough to push me into support. I am slightly concerned though that, should this pass, two of the CUs are bus criticalities (Commons will have a very hard time absorbing their workloads should either retire). I'd like to see 4 or 5 CUs so that krd and Yann have more room to breathe. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  I too have been thinking about this. I think it would be great if some relatively newer admins (with a good tenure both as admins and users) put themselves forward for the role. --Ratekreel (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Always a strong  Support for Yann. Trusted & experienced contributor for over a two decade. Kind regards, Tulsi 24x7 13:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jakubhal 19:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support There are undoubtedly several points of disagreement that I could find regarding Yann's contributions. However he is very involved and experimented experienced . But the more important, two members of the CU's team, who are both very experienced and trustworthy support this candidacy. I support that. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Christian Ferrer: Did you mean ‘experienced’? Brianjd (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

  • @Brianjd: English is not my native langage, isn't it the same thing? Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

    You did use the word ‘experienced’ in the third sentence. I missed that. The second sentence says ‘experimented’. To ‘experiment’ means to try something, as in a science experiment. The word ‘experimented’ does not make any sense in this context. I’m not an English teacher; someone else might be able to explain better. Brianjd (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

    • Thanks you, I fixed it, it is because in french we can literally use "expérimenté" in both senses. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Trustworthy admin. I'm confident that Yann can be a good CU. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Due to the issues other people have raised. Although I'm on the weak side since I don't really see him abusing the checkuser right like he seems to love doing with the normal administrator privileges. Really, he should just be desysopped. The project would certainly be a lot better off if he was. That's a discussion for another time and place though. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• The votes section above has already raised concerns from the de-adminship discussion. Since those concerns are being discussed anyway, I also mention the following:
  • Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Unacceptable threats by Yann: A discussion from this year where another admin and I listed such threats.
  • Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 98#Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Mirror_Selfie_of_erect_penis_with_removed_pubic_hair.jpg: An even more recent discussion about an incident involving me, where the candidate both formed a wrong conclusion based on non-public information and expressed that conclusion in a poor way, making me look bad.

In both cases, the candidate addressed some of the underlying deletion/undeletion issues but failed to acknowledge any communication issues. Even worse, in the first discussion, the candidate said:

Big LOL. This is supposed to be a joke, but your sense of humor is quite obviously lacking... Do you have anything serious to say? Otherwise, please stop wasting my time and others'.

It is the second case that I find particularly concerning, since the community depends on checkusers to carefully analyze very non-public information and carefully communicate their conclusions. I was tempted to vote oppose on that basis, but I want to see more discussion first. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

The candidate did say that, and I still find it concerning, but it might be taken out of context. Or not. I’m too tired to decide. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Honestly, in my more than 20 years on Commons, that's the weirdest complain I have ever seen against anybody. OK, I got that someone didn't like my little joke on my talk page, but reproaching me that in relation to my work as admin or check user, sorry, but I don't understand. For those you might want to know the context, File:God is busy.jpg was on a T-shirt in India, and I find it funny, even more today than when I took the picture. In our world falling apart in every ways, God is probably busy fixing all problems, so They can't bother with the little problems of our community. Yann (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

You deserve credit for participating in this discussion, and for clarifying the meaning of my struck out quote.

But your response also clarifies something else: you insist on continuing your petty dispute with Andy Dingley, while ignoring the real issues here. Brianjd (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

FWIW, Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above, but I don't have any issue with Andy, so I don't understand why they were so aggressive. Yann (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Andy Dingley made the negative comment you linked above I linked directly to the diff by you, with your signature. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Brianjd: Just to understand, what are you complaining about exactly? The erroneous closure of File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg, which I reverted? Or the disagreement about File:Indy Fuel new logo.png, which I undeleted and created a regular DR? FYI, the DR is still open, and for good reason: the outcome is far from obvious. Or File:God is busy.jpg on my talk page? Yann (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I thought my unresolved complaints were clear. Here is a summary of those complaints, which you have not addressed (or even acknowledged) at all:

• Per my contribution to the ‘unacceptable threats’ section, you gave an unnecessary ‘last warning’ to a new user who had already improved their behavior after previous warnings. (That section also raises other serious issues that you have not acknowledged either. One of those issues is an unjustified accusation of incivility together with an unjustified threat of a block, both made towards a fellow admin! I have not looked at the other issues closely.)
• Per the subsequent section about the erroneously closed undeletion request, you falsely implied that I had knowingly requested undeletion of a recent naked picture of a minor.
• Per the comments above, you seem to have falsely attributed your own negative comment to Andy.

Also, the fact that you have not even acknowledged the complaints described above is itself one of my complaints. Brianjd (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I don’t give a damn about this ‘God is busy’ thing. I didn’t realize that my struck out quote was actually about that. (I would be more worried about the template {{Busy}} at the top of your talk page, but actually, you do respond swiftly to most queries, to the extent that you respond at all. So that is one good thing I can say about you.) Brianjd (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding here. I mistaken read "Minor" for "Mirror". I am sorry that you thought that I had accused you of anything.

When I talked about negative comments by Andy Dingley , I mean the ones they made there. I didn't attribute my comment to Andy.

Leyo said that I threatened them linking this. I don't see any threat there. OK, I deleted this file shortly after tagging it. A regular DR would have been better, but I still think it is too complex to be on Commons without a VRT permission.

I tagged File:Finnischer Eishockeyverband logo.svg with missing permission, and the DR created by Andy Dingley is still open. The Squirrel Conspiracy also thinks that is should be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

In view of all this, it seems to me that the complain raised by Leyo here lacks substance. In addition, the complain by Andy of the same page (which includes the ‘God is busy’ thing) looks like a bad faith attempt to criticize me.

I am always ready to apologize and/or revert my actions when necessary. I am more aware than anybody that, on a multilingual and multicultural project like Commons, some misunderstandings and disagreements can ready become big conflicts. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Regarding the undeletion request, I appreciate the belated apology.

Regarding Andy, I linked to the discussion as a whole, then later linked to your comment specifically. When you referred to my link, you were not clear about which one. So yes, there was some misunderstanding. I don’t think that was anyone’s fault.

Regarding the threat to Leyo, I accidentally linked to the revision prior to the correct one. The correct revision was Special:Diff/987704578, where you threatened Leyo, a fellow admin, with a block. Anyway, the correct link was already provided at the ‘unacceptable threats’ discussion.

Regarding the two files whose copyright status is in dispute, I have not looked at them closely, so I currently have no specific comment. I note that files that are considered copyright violations are often deleted immediately, regardless of tags or even discussions. I also note that these two files form context for the next issue.

Regarding the ‘last warning’ to Xgeorg, do you have any comment?

You have not acknowledged my complaint about the ‘last warning’ to Omar.idma. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

• This is not a major issue in itself, but since we are digging up a lot of old discussions here, it would help if you maintained your talk page archives correctly. Your archive links only go up to archive 61, but you now have 63 archives. Brianjd (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Yann (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Jelentkezés adatvédelmi biztosnak

watch

A teljesített kéréseket a Commons:Oversighters/Archive lapon archiváljuk.

• Kérjük, hogy a szavazás előtt olvasd el a Commons:Adatvédelmi biztosok lapot. A kevés vagy nulla szerkesztéssel rendelkező felhasználók szavazatait nem számoljuk össze.

No current requests.

Lásd még

• Commons:Felhasználói jogosultságok szintjei
• Inaktivitási idők