Category talk:Tany Solovey

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This category seems to exist for the purpose of promoting a photographer, who may not be notable. Jamie7687 (talk) 12:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most Commons users are not notable, either. However many of them have personal categories... 191.126.166.100 12:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that I have misunderstood Commons policies regarding scope and promotion. For this case, if two photographs of a person and two 608x1080 videos by a person are uploaded to Wikidata, should that person have their own personal category in the main space, with a subcategory also named after them, even if they are not otherwise notable and these uploads may have been intended for promotion of that person? I would have thought not, but I recognize that I could be mistaken. Jamie7687 (talk) 13:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I should clarify that I am proposing deletion of the category. I do not see evidence that the photographer herself is notable. I think the two promotional shots within it, and its subcategory (though not the nature videos within it), could also be deleted as out-of-scope/promotional, though I have not yet started those discussions. Jamie7687 (talk) 12:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikidata item has also been created for Tany Solovey; I requested deletion at d:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q120548770. Jamie7687 (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment When I originally nominated the Wikidata item for deletion, which is what led to nominating this category, there were only two promotional photos of Solovey; this had been the state of the category for nearly 2 months. The files added since then (i.e. everything except those two photos) may have changed the discussion. If these photos really were released by the photographer under CC-BY-SA and are potentially useful for the purpose of this project (which I think they might be), then this category becomes something more like many of the photographer categories, and less like the non-notable non-contributor promotional category that it looked like a few days ago. I wouldn't contest the closure of this nomination if this category now seems in line with current practice. Jamie7687 (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This category discussion has been closed.
Consensus Resolved by consensus
ActionsNo further action needed
Participants
Closed by Josh (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]