Category talk:Republic of Artsakh
The "unnecessary" definition at the top of the page, "The Republic of Artsakh is a landlocked state with limited recognition in Transcaucasia. It is internationally considered to be part of Azerbaijan, and is closely linked to Armenia" is "unnecessary" (sic). Firstly, because not that so-called Republic is internationally considered to be part of Azerbaijan, but the territory on which it claims sovereignty is considered part of Azerbaijan. Secondly, "is closely linked to Armenia" is quite subjective. I could simply remove this definition, but for a reason not understandable to me, some colleagues are quite sensitive on anything regarding that part of the world. Therefore please without losing several years with a futile discussion simply write here that you agree with me (or not) ASAP so that we can proceed accordingly. E4024 (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: you have posted this in the wrong venue, the categories for discussion page is 'a centralized place to discuss the naming convention of categories'. Your posting concerns the description text in a category page, the place for this discussion is Category talk:Republic of Artsakh. You could draw attention to a category page discussion with a post at the Commons:Village pump.
- In reply to your point, the sentence you refer to could be better phrased, but it does not appear to be misleading. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Never mind, at least something referring to Armenia succeeded in drawing your attention to CfD pages, where your participation is much less than I would like to see. (We need more hours of you in Commons. :) --E4024 (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
@E4024 and Verbcatcher: Closed (no move/rename/delete; discuss header text on category talk page) Josh (talk) 01:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)