Category talk:Penile-vaginal intercourse in art

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unilaterally moved from Category:Penile-vaginal intercourse in art. I suggest reverting to that clear title. Alternative distant second choice would be something like "Works of art depicting penile-vaginal intercourse" which at least would clarify that it is not the penile-vaginal intercourse itself that is rated as a work of art. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this a separate CfD from the one you already raised on the same issue? Wouldn't it be best to keep the discussion in on cohesive place? Josh (talk) 01:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon, this is the only CfD I've raised for this category move. If there was already another one, I did not see it. Link please? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you being purposefully obtuse, or do you really want to handle this one differently than Category:Works of art of women smoking (activity)? Josh (talk) 13:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I act obtusely, it is not deliberate. I was simply calling out what seemed to me badly misnamed categories when I noticed them. The other three seemed a related set, this did not - though I presume you mean to point out that they both share the phrase "Works of art of". That is an interesting observation, and perhaps there should be more discussion of changing categories from the format "X in art" to "Works of art of X" - or if there has already been discussion on that matter I would appreciate a link to it. Returning to the more narrow subject of this particular category name: Please review my original listing above for avoiding apparent obtuseness, or allow me to expand on the point more explicitly: I can easily imagine young lovers after particularly satisfying sex remarking to each other "That was a work of art!". Who are non-participants to second guess their judgement? That is why I offer the alternative formulation "Works of art depicting penile-vaginal intercourse". Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This category discussion has been closed.
Consensus Resolved without objection
Actionsalready done
Participants
Closed by Josh (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]