Category talk:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird of NASA
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This aircraft is named inconsistently in different categories, sometimes "Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird", "Lockheed SR-71", or "SR-71 Blackbird". We should standardize on one of these for all Commons categories. Josh (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
| Proposal A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Category:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird | Move to/Rename as | Category:SR-71 Blackbird | |
 | This will rename the parent category to match the majority of sub-categories. "SR-71 Blackbird" is plenty sufficient to uniquely identify this aircraft so no further disambiguation is required. However, either way we should standardize on one format for this aircraft's name. | |||
 | Josh (talk) 08:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Proposal B | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category:SR-71 Blackbird by location | Move to/Rename as | Category:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird by location | |
| This proposal would change all of the sub-categories of Category:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird to match the name of the parent category.
| |||
| Josh (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
- Oppose dropping the manufacturer name from the category. Military aircraft parent categories are almost universally named using the format "<Company> <Identifier Number> <Name>". They also frequently seem to drop the company name for subcategories. Perhaps that inconsistency isn't ideal, but you should be aware that it's a very widely used scheme. – BMacZero (🗩) 18:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @BMacZero: I think that is fine for aircraft with only one manufacturer to include them in the name. I understand that the dropping of manufacturer names for subcats is frequently though not universally done, but that is no reason to keep doing things wrong. I'm all for a short and concise name for categories, hence my initial proposal, but more important is to name things consistently. If a subject main cat is "Category:Abc Xyz", other cats referring to the subject should call it "Abc Xyz", not arbitrarily shorten it to "Abc" or "Xyz" or even make it "Abc Lmn Xyz". Using a different name should be reserved for indicating a different set, not just laziness or shorthand. Josh (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Strong
Oppose no reason to remove the manufacturer from the category. Align the subcategories with the given parent naming scheme.--AVIA BavARia (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
@BMacZero and AVIA BavARia: Closed (consensus for Proposal B: In cases where there is clearly a single manufacturer that is appropriate to apply to an aircraft name, that manufacturer name should be included as part of the category name. Sub-categories should reflect this as well for vertical consistency in the schema.) Josh (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)