User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

23:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

SignBot

Hello, there is a bug. Regards.--Gratus (discuter) 21:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gratus (talk • contribs) 21:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Gratus: Not a bug. Utilisateur:Gratus is a red link. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Indeeed, I forgot to translate the links, sorry.--Gratus (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

PDM images from this US Army Europe Account

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

Is it possible if the flickrbot could be programmed just to pass PDM licensed images from the above account. I find the images are US military images--usually US Army--and they are in the Public Domain needing Human Review. And they are creating a backlog in the flickr public domain category. See 'Noble Partner'.

Just curious. I have to sign out now as its 2:06 AM in Canada. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't like manually programming exceptions. They should change their license to 'no known copyright restrictions' or cc-0 on Flickr imo. Otherwise you could do mass-reviews :( --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Doesn't seem right

I posted this: "File:Volvo-Pete_crop.jpg". It is a crop of this: "File:Volvo_A40E_dumper_hauled_by_a_Peterbilt_truck.jpg". If the original is OK, shouldn't the crop be? Sammy D III (talk) 12:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Never mind, handled elsewhere. Sorry. Have a nice day. Sammy D III (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

SignBot

Thanks for the SignBot, but in my opinion it does not make any sense to add a sign below a thumb-Picture [10]. I think your Bot should ignore things like [[File:...]].  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

You're free to revert the edit. I don't think it's a good idea to code for some rare exceptions. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
It was the only time ever ever seen the SignBot acting, I never seen it useful, normally the users add signs. Especially on User-talks it is too private to add signs for the user, who is the "owner" of the talkpage, there are in my opinion many exceptions (f.e.You add a picture to your talkpage.[11])  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

This DR

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

Do you know who runs the Flickr2 Commons bot? I have no idea. <us>According to the uploader in the DR, PDM licensed images can be uploaded with this bot but this loophole should be closed. This is a problem for Commons. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

22:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I hope this is the correct vontact method for your bot. It is incorrectly marking images with 'no infobox' when there are. Your bot is not recognising infoboxes. Ex: Image:Crookes Cemetery - Chapel 01-05-06.jpg. Captain Scarlet (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Captain Scarlet: Where is the infobox template on that page? I don't see one. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

22:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Questioning Embedded Data Bot's semi-protections

User:Embedded Data Bot semi-protects files for one minute only after deleting them. Why? Is it effective at all, or is its only purpose to flood Special:Log/protect? 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 22:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

phab:Z567#10614 (restricted link); I will not reveal the reason publicly due to the anti-abuse nature of the task. And yes they are effective against the certain type of abuse mentioned in the link. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 23:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm unlikely to attend, sorry. Too many IRL stuffs :( --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

New to wikicommons

Added links to original flickr uploads:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Austin_Public_Library,_New_Central_Library,_exterior.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Austin_Public_Library,_New_Central_Library,_interior.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3lene (talk • contribs) 15:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Can you recheck? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3lene (talk • contribs) 15:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Value of RepLag

Hi Zhuyifei, is there any possibility to get the value of a server's replag for use in templates or in JS? Now and then (and right now once again) it happens that the Delinquent cannot see the renamed/replaced files due to the replag. That of course leads to a lot of "No such replacement file" messages at User:CommonsDelinker/commands although the requests are formally correct. So one has to wait until the replag is down and edit the page manually (or by other means) afterwards. I think there are 3 possible solutions of that issue:

1. On User:CommonsDelinker/commands/filemovers a conditional warning message like

is shown or

2. A similar thing is added to MediaWiki:ProcessFileMoverRequests.js or
3. The Delinquent looks at the replag of s4 before executing requests from User:CommonsDelinker/commands leaving them temporarily untreated.

Thanks for your help. Pinging Steinsplitter as well. Best, --Achim (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Replag for labs/wmcloud-side can be found at https://tools.wmflabs.org/replag/, but I don't think it has an API for js to read easily from, and I'm not sure if that includes slave lag. You may want to ask bd808 or the DBAs. As for Delinker checking the replag itself, it should be possible, but I don't maintain delinker and idk how it works. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Cheers, --Achim (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
@Achim55: Ist machbar (also, mit Delinker), habe aber gerade keine Zeit. Solche Replag Probleme sollte nicht zu oft auftreten, vielecht sollte man Template:Toolserver wiederbeleben wenn doch - weil es eine vielzahl an Tools betrifft. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

19:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Watermark vs CCBYSA...

Hi.

Do you think images with watermatk are compatibles with the Commons licences ? Do you take a look at each file you upload from Flickr ? All the pictures of this cat' have a watermark. Even if it gives many new files for Commons, that gives a lot of work to ad the watermark template and for the users who remove those watermarks...

Please do something when you bot upload files to make it forgot this kind of images. Thanks a lot. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Do you think images with watermatk are compatibles with the Commons licences?
    Yes. CC licenses do not forbid watermarks. Removing watermarks is in fact illegal as far as I know.
  • Do you take a look at each file you upload from Flickr?
    You might be talking to the wrong person here. I don't personally upload from Flickr.
  • Please do something when you bot upload files to make it forgot this kind of images.
    What should I do? Which bot? Do you have a diff on the bot's edit? I operate six bot accounts and around three dozen bot tasks and I have no idea which one you are talking about.
--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 21:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
All files (and certainly many other) of the cat above with User:FlickreviewR. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
That bot does not detect watermarks (and it is difficult to detect automatically anyhow). It simply upload the original versions of the images uploaded to Flickr, when necessary. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 01:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Images with watermark have no chance to be used in Wikis and I don't think they'll be by anyone without removing (illegally, as you said) out of Wikis so they're useless... But that's like that and I can't do more than asking what I asked...
Thanks for your replies. See you. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 21:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello.Why there are no other bots review files from other websites such as Flickr?Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand your question. For Flickr there is User:FlickreviewR 2 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I suggest creating similar bots for other websites.For example: to review images from Pixabay.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
xkcd 1205: Is It Worth the Time? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Do you mean that this is unnecessary?This will saves humans a lot of time.I think it is possible to apply the FlickreviewR method with most sites.Some images in addition to videos will remain for humans.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
You are free to contribute your time if you deem it necessary; I do not personally have such time unless it can be shown that doing so is worth the time (expect a few hours) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

An update from Wiki Loves Monuments UK

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK
More than 300 people have contributed a total of 4,000 photos to this year's competition and we wanted to say thank you for helping us get this far. The competition runs until the end of September, and you can upload as many images as you want - so feel free to document some more sites. Or why not go through your old images to see if you have any others that could be submitted?

Since you've already submitted some pictures to the competition, you might be interested in the banner mini-contest; to take part you crop your images to a 7:1 and upload a new version. You can find out more about how to do that here. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy the competition and share it with others! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)}

RichBebo

RichBebo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log is a CU confirmed sock of Virajmishra (talk · contribs). cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 15:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks. Indef'ed --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I just found another sock -- RocketFast (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log, I've blocked on en, but this isn't CU confirmed. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 15:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I guess I'll wait for CU confirmation or actual misbehavior before blocking --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)