User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Zhuyifei1999, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard an it subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations! Welcome to the team! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations! I missed the whole thing. --Jarekt (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks guys. @Jarekt: Sorry if I didn't ping you; I didn't feel like simply notifying other to vote :P --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Welcome aboard! Take to aspirin and get going! Clin Good luck and don't forget to have fun! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry I missed your candidature (I was in San Francisco), but congrats & good luck! Trijnsteltalk 00:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations! I too missed this. Jee 02:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Flickrreview bot

The flickrreview bot appears to be marking images sporadically right now. Perhaps it needs a minor boost as the flickr backlog is large. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

It keeps crashing when reviewing videos. I'll work on a workaround when I have time. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

YAUB

Hi,

You said you like challenges. So I have one more with YAUB (Yet Another Uploading Bot) ;o).

I'd like to upload videos from NASA, but the current process (download > convert > upload) is really not practical unless you have a very fast connection on a big machine. Actually, it is even more complex than that:

  • With Firefox or Chrome, 2 extensions are needed (DownloadHelp and a Convertissor);
  • For a big video like [1] (25 mn), it would take ages with my connection.

So ideally, the things a video-upload tool should do:

  1. Take the URL from YouTube,
  2. Get the video, convert it to a free format (Theora or Webm),
  3. Upload it on Commons after logging in the user with OAuth.

Possible? Regards, Yann (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Not sure. Sounds very difficult. Like, much more difficult than GAP. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, obviously. But it would be a great tool, useful for a lot of people (more than GAP). ;o) Yann (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
After a lot of try-and-error, I managed to upload a short video (2:30), and I am not even sure is OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Is ogg better or webm better for uploading? Looks like youtube-dl can do the job, but converting takes a long time. For that 2:30 video, I get a 27M combined audio+video mkv file, then converted to a 6.6M webm --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
For ogg, I get this a 7.4M video. avprobe output shows:
avprobe outputs 
$ avprobe NASA\ _\ Webb\ Space\ Telescope\ Integrated\ Science\ Instrument\ Module\ begins\ Final\ Cryogenic\ Test-joILdG6aB0w.ogg
avprobe version 9.18-6:9.18-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, Copyright (c) 2007-2014 the Libav developers
  built on Mar 16 2015 13:19:10 with gcc 4.8 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1)
[ogg @ 0x241cc00] 17 bytes of comment header remain
[ogg @ 0x241cc00] truncated comment header, 1 comments not found
Input #0, ogg, from 'NASA _ Webb Space Telescope Integrated Science Instrument Module begins Final Cryogenic Test-joILdG6aB0w.ogg':
  Duration: 00:02:30.30, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 410 kb/s
    Stream #0.0: Video: theora, yuv420p, 1280x720 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 28.08 fps, 29.97 tbn, 29.97 tbc
    Metadata:
      MAJOR_BRAND     : dash
      MINOR_VERSION   : 0
      COMPATIBLE_BRANDS: iso6avc1mp41
      CREATION_TIME   : 2015-10-29 11:11:14
    Stream #0.1: Audio: vorbis, 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 112 kb/s
    Metadata:
      MAJOR_BRAND     : dash
      MINOR_VERSION   : 0
      COMPATIBLE_BRANDS: iso6avc1mp41
      CREATION_TIME   : 2015-10-29 11:11:14
      ENCODER         : Lavf56.1.0
# avprobe output

$ avprobe NASA_Webb_Space_Telescope_Integrated_Science_Instrument_Module.ogg
avprobe version 9.18-6:9.18-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, Copyright (c) 2007-2014 the Libav developers
  built on Mar 16 2015 13:19:10 with gcc 4.8 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1)
[ogg @ 0x240bc00] Unknown skeleton version 4.0
[ogg @ 0x240bc00] Multiple fisbone for the same stream is not implemented. Update your Libav version to the newest one from Git. If the problem still occurs, it means that your file has a feature which has not been implemented.
[ogg @ 0x240bc00] max_analyze_duration reached
Input #0, ogg, from 'NASA_Webb_Space_Telescope_Integrated_Science_Instrument_Module.ogg':
  Duration: 00:02:30.20, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 746 kb/s
    Stream #0.0: Data: skeleton
    Stream #0.1: Video: theora, yuv420p, 1280x720 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 29.50 fps, 29.97 tbn, 29.97 tbc
    Stream #0.2: Audio: vorbis, 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s
    Metadata:
      ENCODER         : VLC media player
Unsupported codec with id 0 for input stream 0
# avprobe output
--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: How's this version looking? Your first version seem to have parts of the video missing, and my first had very bad quality. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, something went wrong in my version, and I don't even know why. Your version is obviously better. I think it doesn't really matter, as Mediwiki creates derivative: File:NASA Webb Space Telescope Integrated Science Instrument Module.ogg#Transcode status. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-45

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • You can now see how many editors are using a gadget on a wiki on Special:GadgetUsage. [2]
  • If you are using the mobile version of Wikipedia, you can now see Wikidata descriptions under article titles in search results. [3]
  • Editing conflicts are now detected when you edit on a mobile device. Before, this did not work properly on mobile. [4]

Problems

  • On October 26 the Wikimedia sites went down for ten minutes. [5]

Changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 3. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 4. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).

Meetings

Future changes

  • A help link will be added to Special:Search. Administrators might have to update the MediaWiki:Search-summary message to avoid two help links. [6]
  • Empty list items could be allowed in the future. If so, this could affect some templates. [7]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Signature

They are all signed. What do you see that I don't?

There isn't much incentive to sign it if it's going to sign it for you when you hit save. The system is poor. You've all adapted, and I probably will too, but the system is poor.

Sdooleyfjuhsd (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Sdooleyfjuhsd (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

You clearly didn't sign. As for the incentives, would you like your talk page getting spammed by {{subst:Please sign}}? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Images

Hola, me podrías ayudar. Podrías verificar esta imagen y subirla a Wikipedia porfavor?. Roxana Baldetti y esta imagen porfavor Roxana Baldetti --ElisonSeg (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC) Roxana Baldetti

Porfavor, si usted fuera tan amable, podría subirlas si se podrían. Gracias. Espero su respuesta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElisonSeg (talk • contribs) 02:10, 06 November 2015 (UTC)

@Alan: Could you explain to him that ND licences aren't allowed? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
@ElisonSeg:
Te respondo yo que mi compañero no habla español.
Las licencias Creative Commons están permitidas en Wikimedia Commons siempre que no incluyan restricciones, es decir:
  • NC: No comercial: es el caso que afecta en esta situación. Todo material multimedia que se aloja en este proyecto debe permitir que sea reutilizado para cualquier fin, sea comercial o no.
  • ND: No obras derivadas: Aunque en este caso no ocurre, tampoco se permite ya que restringe que alguien pueda alterar la imagen.
Por lo que quedarían permitidas las siguientes:
  • CC BY:
  • CC BY-SA
  • CC 0 (Dominio público)
Hay información ampliada en Commons:Sobre las licencias que creo que puede aclarar muchas dudas.
Un saludo, Alan (talk) 07:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 Info
  • photo 1 - CC BY-SA 2.0 - allowed/permitida
  • photo 2 - CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 - Not allowed / no permitida
  • photo 3 - CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 - Not allowed / no permitida
La primera foto si puede ser subida a Commons, la otras 2 no y habría que cambiar la licencia en flickr o enviar un permiso a COM:OTRS.
Saludos, Alan (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Alan (talk), sería usted tan amable de subir la imagen porfavor. Ya que no tengo experiencia en este tipo de imágenes. Gracias de antemano. --ElisonSeg (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
@ElisonSeg: Ahora que lo he mirado no me di cuenta que tampoco es posible ya que tiene licencia ND (no obras derivadas) y como he comentado más arriba no es una licencia permitida. Ya lo siento. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-46

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • Superprotect has been removed. [8]
  • You can now switch between the wikitext editor and the visual editor without saving. You will not lose the changes you have made. [9]
  • JSON dumps of the production search indexes are now available. They can be imported to Elasticsearch. [10]

Problems

  • Some translations for the Thanks and Echo extensions were missing. Translators have been asked to help and this should be solved soon. [11]

Changes this week

  • Thumbnails of 16-bit TIFF files will be displayed properly. Before, this didn't work. [12]
  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar).

Meetings

  • You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Signing deletion requests

User:SignBot isn't signing unsigned comments in deletion requests. Can this feature be implemented? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Sure, but there is some complexities in implementing it. Not all subpages of COM:DR are deletion requests (some are date subpages). And DRs are not like usual talk pages; some test runs would be needed to verify it works as expected. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-47

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes this week

  • You can use TemplateData to indicate how you want a template to be displayed in wikitext. Tools like VisualEditor that edit templates will soon use this information. [15]
  • Echo notification icons in MonoBook will look more like other icons in the theme. [16]
  • The Community Tech team is doing a community wishlist survey to understand what they should be working on. They are now accepting proposals in all languages. You can create your proposal in the small box above the blue button and click it when you're done.
  • Wikis can make the welcome notification link to a specific page. [17]
  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 17. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 18. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 19 (calendar).

Meetings

  • You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 17 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

  • Internet Explorer 8 will no longer have JavaScript support. You will still be able to browse and edit Wikipedia, but will not be able to use some features. This can be solved by upgrading to a newer version or switching to a different browser. The change will happen in January 2016. [18][19]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop

You have recently dumped hundreds of images into the landscapes category. Please stop. landscapes is not a garbage bin category. The page is already overcrowded and there is a header is the page which states that. Pictures of fish, koalas, buildings and bicycles do not belong in the landscape category. Thank you. Mark Marathon (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

@Mark Marathon: You probably finding the wrong person here. Could you provide a diff? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 00:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Change template

Why not use {{Unsigned3}} and do a little education along with the signing? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Please not. Looks like the bot is sending a warning to the users talkpage. No need to have unneeded text at udel etc. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

REALLY IT IS A DERIVATE WORK??

Please Verify If This File (File:KSnH (Original Soundtrack - OST).jpg) is a Derivate Work, Becacuse His User Uploaded it Under a Free License. Thanks

Danyel3096 (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The image is a derivative work of a likely-copyrighted cover artwork, and clearly not quality for de minimis --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-48

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • A new Pageview API has been announced. Feedback is requested to help decide which data to add to it next.

Changes this week

  • There are no MediaWiki deployments this week (calendar).

Meetings

Future changes

  • From 1 December, the MediaWiki API will no longer support the dbg, txt, and yaml output formats. [20]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Bot edit summary

Hi Zhuyifei1999. Would you mind teaching your bot to mention the number remaining interwiki links, too? In this example, the edit summary might be “1/5 Interwiki-Link(s) nach Wikidata (d:q683906) migriert” or “1 Interwiki-Link(s) nach Wikidata (d:q683906) migriert; 4 Interwiki-Link(s) verbleiben”. What do you think? --Leyo 23:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hmm. Is it better to keep "0 Interwiki-Link(s) verbleiben" when all of them are removed? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
If there is no interwiki link remaining, this does not need to be mentioned IMHO. The reason behind my request is that users watching an article are noticed by your bot concerning the incomplete migration to Wikidata. Hence, some of them might try to fix the Wikidata item. --Leyo 00:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Ok, will code that on Friday --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Great, thank you. --Leyo 11:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Changes will have effect in next run. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

In French

Hello, I saw something similar in French : for 1 link the summary should be "Retrait de 1 lien interlangue, désormais fourni par ...", or if singular and plural cannot be distinguished "Retrait de <number> lien(s) interlangue(s), désormais fourni(s) par ..." Thanks in advance: Oliv0 (talk) 11:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Changes will have effect in next run. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-49

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

The symbol for advanced news items has been changed. This is because the symbols were too similar. If a news item is for more technical readers it now looks like this: . You can give feedback on this change.

Problems

  • On September 29 users' skin preferences were removed by mistake on small and medium-sized wikis. This changed preferences back to Vector. Restoring all data would cause even more problems. Affected users who want to have their preference changed back globally can ask for it as a comment on Phabricator task T119206 until December 21 2015. [21]
  • Some scheduled tasks were not working properly from September to recently. This meant some pages in the special pages namespace were not updated. It has now been fixed. [22]

Changes this week

  • Wikinews, Wikispecies, MediaWiki.org and Meta will be able to use information from Wikidata. [23][24]
  • There are no MediaWiki deployments this week (calendar).

Meetings

Future changes

  • Category watchlists are now available on test wikis and MediaWiki.org. The plan is to enable it on most wikis in January. [25]
  • Cross-wiki notifications are being developed. When this is done you will not have to go to the wiki where something happened to be notified. [26]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

co-mentoring at Google_Code-in_2015

Zhuyifei1999, I signed up for mentoring at Google_Code-in_2015 and come up with several tasks related to Commons for varying degrees of expertise. I was wandering if you could co-mentor some of those with me, so if someone needs help they have more chances to get a quick reply and to widen the range of expertise as we both specialize in a little different things. thanks --Jarekt (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Sure, I'll check later today. I'm not sure if I can help much because of this timezone here :P --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Redirect CC-PD images out of flickr human review into a new category

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

Is it possible to redirect the flickr review bot to direct All images with a cc-pd 1.0 license such as this or this into a separate category away from flickr images needing human review They are clogging up this category and almost all the images here have this license and face a DR which won't close for who knows how long. Could the flickrbot be programmed to place them in a new category by itself?

Images with a cc-zero license like {{Cc0}} can be marked by us (since the copyright owner formally relinquishes all rights to the image) but images with a cc-pd license like this is not compatible with Commons since its not a license and the copyright owner doesn't give up any rights at all? Do you have a solution? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Sure. A new template and a category will be required for this. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
And shall images under PDM but tagged with PD license templates like {{PD-Author}}, or images under PDM but tagged with any license template, or images under PDM but tagged with any license template but PD ones, or all images under PDM be put into the new category? Right now the code is that images under PDM but tagged with any license template but PD ones goes to human review, and images under PDM but tagged with PD license templates are a direct pass. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
I mean images under PDM with what condition on commons? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Just also place in this category images where the uploader claims {{PD-Author}} but then links the image to a PD-1.0 version of the image file under flickr. Then the human reviewer can catch this PD-1.0 version problem and file a DR. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
In that case, having all images under PDM put into the new cat seems like the best idea. Will do tomorrow. Just to clarify, by PDM I meant Public Domain Mark on flickr ---Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hmm. Now I have some doubts on how to handle this properly. Creating a new category will seem to have all images in Category:Flickr_public_domain_images_needing_specific_licenses included, creating redundancy (no PD license but claimed to be PD => human review needed); but in the closing statement of Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images it's said that "We can't relicense something from PD Mark 1.0 to another PD-license/template". It seems that human review may be required for all images under PDM, requiring the bot to have not a "pass" but a "public-domain-mark" human review. @Jarekt, Josve05a, Yann, and Revent: Do you have any suggestions? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Zhuyifei1999 I am sorry I am a bit lost with what is the exact procedure the bot follows at the moment. Is there some page describing handling of each template? --Jarekt (talk) 13:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Right now the procedure is:
  • When a PD license template that transclude {{PD-Layout}} is added: direct pass, no human review. This handling should be changed to a human review queue somehow.
  • When a license template is added but not any with {{PD-Layout}}: goes to general "reviewed-error" a.k.a. "size_not_found" queue
  • When no license is added at all: {{safesubst:Flickr-public domain mark/subst}} + image goes to general "reviewed-error" queue
If I understand Leoboudv correctly, the last two procedure needs to go to another queue to separate them from Category:Flickr_images_needing_human_review.
--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Zhuyifei1999 understand my suggestion right. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I support creating specialized subcategories of Category:Flickr_images_needing_human_review for all 3 cases you mentioned. I am quite confused about the current consensus that PDM added by the photographer on flickr is not equivalent to {{PD-Author}}. I understand that PD is not defined in all the countries but if the photographer says on flickr (a US-based company) that work is in Public domain than I should be able to upload it to Commons under any license including {{PD-author}}.

So I do not understand something about the first option, but I think it is a good idea to have specialized categories for each case. --Jarekt (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh well, Josve05a asked me for a log of all image passed directly under the first case. Also his concluding statement in Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images expressed concerns on these images. I kind of agree on these, for the extremely-complicated US PD criteria here. As for the categories, I'll work on them tomorrow. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done flickreviewr.py commit, Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review, User:FlickreviewR/public-domain-mark --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_14&oldid=181751758"