User talk:Zala

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Zala!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Hej[edit]

Jestem i tu;) Sylwpak (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category::-)]]

Mistake with Phonix D.II[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phönix_D.II.jpg The file you uploaded is a Hansa-Brandenburg D.I NOT a Phonix D.II. You may see the difference clearly when looking at interplane struts - just google Phonix D.II and compare. regardsRoclorD (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stanislaw Zarzecki szer.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stanislaw Zarzecki szer.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stanislaw Zarzecki kpr BKZ.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stanislaw Zarzecki kpr BKZ.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stanislaw Zarzecki kpr.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stanislaw Zarzecki kpr.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuport 24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NiD.29 (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrzesień to czas na Wiki Lubi Zabytki![edit]

Dzień dobry! Piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ w poprzednich latach brałeś udział w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki w Polsce. Bardzo ucieszylibyśmy się, gdybyś włączył się do konkursu również w tym roku i pomógł nam w dokumentowaniu polskiego dziedzictwa kulturowego dla przyszłych pokoleń.

Możesz dowiedzieć się więcej o konkursie na stronie konkursu. Wydarzenie będzie trwało do 30 września 2019. Czekamy na Twoje zdjęcia!

Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krótko mówiąc za dużo dobrego? ;) Ale widziałam wkład w MWA i no, co tu mówić - dobra robota. Ja mam nadzieję jedno wyróżnione zdążyć napisać, ale ostatnio z czasem krucho, więc zobaczymy, czy się uda. Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

cze :)[edit]

And-kulak (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zala,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zala,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2020[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie, piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu! Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem www.zabytki.wikimedia.pl. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września :)

Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie - Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 09:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zala,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2021[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

Pozdrawiam, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malatia Armée et marine revue 1908.jpg[edit]

Ano zły link :) W nocie copyrightowej był ok, do numeru czasopisma, ale w opisie był do katalogu :( --Felis domestica (talk) 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ORP Wicher dziala.jpg[edit]

Na zdjęciu jest stanowisko dwudziałowe, a na Wichrze były tylko jednodziałowe. Ponadto naboje wyglądają na scalone, a działa Wichra były rozdzielnego ładowania.

Może być to zdjęcie Groma albo Błyskawicy.Topory (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loire-Nieuport_LN.40[edit]

File:Loire-Nieuport LN.40.jpg

Mam wątpliwości, czy to jest rzeczywiście ten typ samolotu. W kategorii Category:Loire-Nieuport_LN.40 wszystkie pozostałe ilustracje przedstawiają samolot jednomiejscowy, z wciąganym podwoziem, śmigłem trójpłatowym i trzema statecznikami pionowymi. Ten tutaj jest dwumiejscowy, ma stałe podwozie, śmigło jednopłatowe i pojedynczy statecznik pionowy. Trochę za dużo tych różnic. Gżdacz (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loire-Nieuport LN.40.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gżdacz (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2022[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

W imieniu organizatorów konkursu, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 14:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amiot 143 PD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pibwl (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zala,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:402:9F00:7037:1C61 11:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lida pomnik Franciszka Skaryny 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]