User talk:Yuval CT/Archive-6

Welcome to my chat page Archives: August 2006 - November 2006 December 2006 - May 2007 May 2007 - August 2007 September 2007 - October 2007 October 2007 - December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 - April 2008 May 2008 - October 2008 November 2008 - February 2009 March 2009 - June 2009 June 2009 - October 2009 December 2009 - May 2011 June 2011 - October 2012 November 2012 - December 2013 March 2014 - November 2018 Start a discussion

ברוכים הבאים לדף השיחה שלי ארכיונים: אוגוסט 2006 - נובמבר 2006 דצמבר 2006 - מאי 2007 מאי 2007 - אוגוסט 2007 ספטמבר 2007 - אוקטובר 2007 אוקטובר 2007 - דצמבר 2007 ינואר 2008 פברואר 2008 - אפריל 2008 מאי 2008 - אוקטובר 2008 נובמבר 2008 - פברואר 2009 מארס 2009 - יוני 2009 יוני 2009 - אוקטובר 2009 דצמבר 2009 - מאי 2011 יוני 2011 - אוקטובר 2012 נובמבר 2012 - דצמבר 2013 מארס 2014 - נובמבר 2018 פתיחת דיון חדש

————————————————٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶————————————————

RE: Copyright violations

Hi, I am indeed completely lost. I thought I followed the instruction carefully and provided all the info. I obtained the images from a public domain http://www.beijingupdates.com/. As a matter of fact, the photographer is a friend on that web site which I visit everyday. He actually shared those photos with all of us in the forum of that web site. Why do you think they are not free? By studying this picture at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tianning_sita.jpg, it seems all I need to modify is changing "Permission" to "Released under the GNU Free Documentation License." Is it correct? Just as plain text or code it, which I'll need your help to do so. Your help is greatly appreciated. ----PoZoPOCO 15:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

For your convenience, your message is quoted below

"Hello PoZoPOCO,

You have uploaded several images that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Please do leave me a message if you have further questions. Yuval Y § Chat § 23:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)"

again me

Hi, it's me again. I want to know if uploading my images to flickr and select "Some rights reserved CC-BY-SA", i can upload it on commons?Srmagnetismo 01:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

i checked it. I uploaded this image Image:Kamael.jpg (i selected and uploaded the rights in flickr with my account). Tell me if i can upload more images like that one. If i can't, just delete it. Srmagnetismo (marquinahundry) 00:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Why?

Why mi picture has been deleted and it's on english commons? I only want to link it from wikipedia. Aleix87 18:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Portal Lide left.png

The grey text is fading on the grey background... Can you choose a different color..? Yuval Y § Chat § 22:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

What coulour would you like? And why? This one is only for my internal logo for portal on Czech Wikipedia. Regards -- Petr.noha 22:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Since you've uploaded the image to Commons, it can be used anywhere. I suggest a blue text, anyway.. =) Yuval Y § Chat § 22:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I know it can be use anywhere, but the thing is that there is Czech name either, so not sure if it's useful for anyone... The reason why I asked you is if I shall make a logo for you and what text I shall put in. I can make a logo for you and put it on Wikicommons under the name you wish. --Petr.noha 23:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Even if it's for your own webpage, think about the users who'd have difficulties in viewing the text. That's why I suggested blue on grey... Yuval Y § Chat § 23:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

As the logo has no informational value on the Portal I don't think it should be visable so good, there is original logo of Czech Wikipedie and my green logo is only for the final design of the Portál:Lidé

Please delete the old version of Image:SnowGolan (6).JPG

Please delete the old version of Image:SnowGolan (6).JPG and keep only the current one. Thanks in advance. MathKnight 19:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

HI

Hi! My name is...okay you will understand by the signature. I'm a new user,so i like to know a new user,so i founded you. This is only the beginning. --WikiWonder hello! 20:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Adrianne Curry image.

Ooops, I'm sorry. I put the right licence on the image page.

Glitter1959 17:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Glitter1959

Re: About the flickr images

Yes, I've noticed it. That flickr account is my mother's and I have created my own account that does not have the copyright images (I hope, lol). Thanks for pointing it out.

Glitter1959 20:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Glitter1959

Vandalismo

Perdona, pero no sé a que vandalismo te refieres en la imagen de scotty2hottyworm.jpg. Indicamelo para no volver a cometer el fallo. Gracias y saludos--Techarrow 13:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

What can I?

Can this image actually be uploaded to wikimedia commons any way? It doesn't fit the usual flickr licenses that is compatible with wikipedia. But is there some kind of creative-commons license I can use? Thanks. Benjwong 20:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. I have contacted the user already. But apparently many people (not just this user) assume this license is compatible with wikimedia commons. But it is not. I just wanted to verify, since you know this stuff well. Thanks. Benjwong 01:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help.

See My recent block log. After I did a checkuser I came up with a lot of different sleeper accounts, if you don't mind marking those as well! Cary Bass ^demandez 21:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick blocking, well done! Yuval Y § Chat § 21:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Venatiosmini.jpg

I have translated the permission into English. Regards, BeŻet 18:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Logosun.jpg (delated for Copyright violation)

Hi,

I have write an article about the radio SUN - Le Son Unique à Nantes. And the picture "Logosun.jpg" had been deleted for Copyright violation reason. i am the director of SUN (Nantes) and I give the autorisation to wikipedia to plubicated this picture.

Best regards Pierre Boucard SUN - Le Son Unique à Nantes

23:01, 29 February 2008 Yuval Y (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Logosun.jpg" ‎ (Copyright violation)

—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Pibou (talk • contribs)

The image was first deleted after a deletion debate since it was a Derivative work of the Sun logo. Taking your word that you're the copyright holder of the image - the procedure is to email this release form to the OTRS system, but pay attention - if you're not willing that anyone would be able to use your image everywhere including with a caption such as "this station sux", it's better that you'd upload the image to the wikipedia as a fair use image - if your wikipedia allows that. Yuval Y § Chat § 13:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Description

Hi! All of these pictures are from the wikimeetup in Budapest. I don't know half of these users, so there is no way I can give descriptions. Furthermore: What is there to say? Every picture in that category is of huwiki users. Villy

I can ask the others to sign the pictures if it's about them, but as of now I can't give more info than this. Villy 21:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Either you write "A wikipedian", or you write "please identify yourself". Why don't you open a gallery in the Wikipedia, where the users can identify themself? =) Yuval Y § Chat § 21:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

תמונות רכיבים אלקטרוניים

שלום יובל. העלאתי 3 תמונות של רכיבים אלקטרונים 8952 altera. מעוניינת להוסיף אותם לערכים. הם הוגדרו יתומים כנראה. אלו תמונות שאני צילמתי. הכרטיסים של חברת ses (ציינתי זאת) מה חסר?

תודה, יאנה

—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Yz2 (talk • contribs)

צריך לערוך את הטקסט בכל תמונה ולהוסיף את הפרטים החסרים, עדיפות לאנגלית

Yuval Y § Chat § 20:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

נא ליצור הקשרים לקבצים

נכתב בלשון זכר למען הנוחות

שלום לך.

תודה שהוספת תמונות לוויקישיתוף. הבא לתשומת לבך כי התמונות אשר העלית לוויקישיתוף אמורים להיות שימושיים עבור כל משתמשי פרוייקט הוויקימדיה, וזאת בתנאי שאנשים אחרים יוכלו לאתר אותם.

בכדי לאפשר לאנשים אחרים לאתר את התמונות שהעלית לכאן, על התמונות להיות במקום שבו יהיה אפשר לאתר אותן באמצעות שימוש בעץ הקטגוריות. לפיכך, עליך לקשר את התמונה לקטגוריה המתאימה, וכמו כן ניתן גם לשים את התמונה בדפי הנושא (גלריות) (ראה Commons:Categories להסבר נוסף). בכדי למצוא את הקטגוריות המתאימות לתמונות שלך, ניתן להיעזר בכלי CommonSense.

תוכל להיעזר בכלי הגלריה בכדי לצפות בקבצים אשר העלית.

הנקודה החשובה כאן היא שהתמונות יושמו במבנה כללי כלשהו. בוויקישיתוף יש מספר רב של תמונות אשר אינן מקושרות כלל. אם תוכל לעזור למקם חלק מתמונות אלה, בקטגוריות ו/או גלריות, בכדי שיהיה ניתן לאתר אותן, אנא עשה זאת.

תודה.

Yuval Y § Chat § 15:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Pardon the English response, but I am away from a Hebrew keyboard at the moment. I am a little overwhelmed with the amount of wikibureaucracy. It is hard enough for me to figure it out in the English wikipedia that I would rather not try to figure it out for the Hebrew wikipedia also. If you must remove my pictures, I understand, but I just don't know what to do in order to meet all of the regulations.

Thank you for calling this to my attention. Screen stalker 22:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hannukah souvenir sheet stamps

Greetings. Thanks for notifying me that you put a speedy delete up for Image:Hannakah joint souvenir leaf.jpg. Your concern seems to be with the MFA source of the image. However, this particular image is not subject to the MFA copyright claims because from what I understand Israeli stamps are not subject to copyright. So, would you mind withdrawing the speedy or else provide me with more info? Pls reply to my Talk. Thanks muchly. HG talk 03:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Even if the postcard is free, or even pd-old (or pd-israel in that case) - the digital image belongs to MFA. If you have the actual postcard, you can scan it and tag it in any free tag you choose. Yuval Y § Chat § 12:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Think of it - when you take a picture, or scan one, you own the copyrights of the digital image - which doesn't include the copyrights of the object itself. Same with MFA - they own the copyrights of the digital image. Yuval Y § Chat § 12:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm wondering if you are correct about that. There needs to be significant human creative input to be eligible for copyright at all. Otherwise, the image doesn't pass the threshold of originality. "Works must show sufficient human creativity to be eligible to copyright at all." "Photographic reproductions, as a form of derivative work, may inherit the copyright of the original work. If that artwork is in the public domain, then so is the photograph." (from WP:PD) So, just because I scan some free artwork, and upload it to the web, I don't thereby have a copyright claim to it. Plus, I don't see how Israeli agencies can copyright it's own free content. So, no, digital images of free content are not merely copyrighted. Thanks muchly, HG 13:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

As far as I recall, they can, and images from MFA are not allowed in the Hebrew Wikipedia, no matter how old the original images are. Please refer to he:ויקיפדיה:זכויות יוצרים/שאלות ותשובות. Yuval Y § Chat § 13:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Even the images of the Knesset members are copyrighted no matter when the image was taken (the original or the digital version). Yuval Y § Chat § 13:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Noy

My friend, please take care of that. Gridge 19:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC).

Image copyrights for Hunter Lewis bio

I am new to the Wiki world, and I have done my best to complete the info needed on the images I uploaded for Hunter Lewis' bio. Can you look and give me some coaching if needed?

Todd —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Tschroeder250 (talk • contribs)

I'll do my best... Yuval Y § Chat § 22:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

re. Faderov (talk · contribs)

Blocked, just like the other two. Let me know if you've got any objections to this, or if any others crop up (which you could block yourself if you like). Cheers, giggy _(:O) 00:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Eek! I never knew we had those templates (maybe make mention of that category in the "user is now blocked" message...;)...I'll try and remember to use them in the future. Thanks again, giggy _(:O) 04:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Help

Could you have a look at my questions on the talk page? I'm not aware what I'm doing wrong here. The author, source and license are clear i think : what do i miss?? JacobH 21:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Flickr

Hello, yeah, of course, i can use these upload page, but, just, what is the advantage ? Regards Stef48 19:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete the Opera Acid3 image

I specifically got the author (Tim Altman) to add a license acceptable to WP. Continue the discussion at my talk page.--Itpastorn 21:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Images

Hello, I understand your concern about copyright violations, and support it fully, but I can assure you that I have the complete rights to use the images I have uploaded so far. They are from a public domain created by the artist Doctor Steel and he has expressed full rights given to me to use them for his wikipedia entry, and his sister entry for his fan-club Doctor Steels Toy Soldiers. I am technically a new wikipedia user, and do not know how to explain the pictures copyright status on the uploading page. --Aridnyk89 21:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

There's a procedure for that, it called OTRS. Pay attention - placing the image in Wikimedia Commons, means that anyone can do anything with those images. Are you sure that Doctor Steel allows that? If not, Please upload them to the wikipedia. Yuval Y § Chat § 22:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I am absolutely positive that Doctor Steel gives me express and full rights to upload, share, and use his pictures. If you would like, I can get an email expressly from him describing these rights given to me. I thank you for your concerns. --Aridnyk89 22:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Matrix core.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Matrix core.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Church of emacs 15:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

image eliminate

hi, the image is free therefore this in the destined part the press of the site of the singer.

how I must make descricao in this case?

18h33min de 31 de Março de 2008 Yuval Y (Discussão | contribs) eliminada "Image:Wilson sideral.jpg" ‎ (Copyright violation: www.jotaquest.com.br)

the image does not have relation with the site www.jotaquest.com.br because this writing this?

as I said before it was removed of link "the press".

—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Dej espindola (talk • contribs)

Even press images are copyrighted. If the site doesn't claim the image is free it's copyrighted. Yuval Y § Chat § 20:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

FInfo tool and Flickr Images

Thank you for your note on my talk page (User_talk:Owlmonkey). I left a suggestion there about image comments, any idea who I would make that suggestion to? Thanks. - Owlmonkey 00:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:T-shirt-black.jpg

Hi, this image is a cropped version of Image:Trent Tesoro.jpg, which is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.5. Therefore, there shouldn't be any problem with creating a derivative version of the image provided that it is distributed under an identical licence. I've updated the image description page to state more clearly the source of the image. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 00:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I guess I've haven't noticed the OTRS tag on the original image. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yuval Y § Chat § 10:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries! Thanks for being vigilant. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 14:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image License on Saint Sebald Church

Hi, noticed you tagged Image:Sebald cyark 4.jpg‎ that I posted to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sebald_cyark_2.jpg with an Editor's summary: Warning: image missing source or licensing information. The site that I acquired the image from, www.cyark.org, is a nonprofit that has a great number of Creative Commons-licensed images that are freely usable with site attribution and share-alike license. As I am a big fan of the site, and it has a large amount of good material for suitable for wikipedia, I use its contents frequently when helping to flesh out archaeological and heritage site entries - Creative Commons material of this quality is unusual. Note open access statement at http://archive.cyark.org/about.php?subject_name=Grants and specific reference to Creative Commons licensing of images at http://archive.cyark.org/news_events.php?news_ID=12 . I took the liberty of removing the tag, if you disagree with this action please feel free to contact me on my page and we can discuss it further. Thanks for looking out for copyrighted materials... DuendeThumb 01:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I marked the image on the Commons, not in the Wikipedia, as I guess you've noticed, and as for the image, it is lovely, though I haven't quite understood from the links you've added if the image is indeed free, and what about the other images from the site... Yuval Y § Chat § 10:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC):

From what I have understood, all images on the site are CC licensed, as that is part of their mission to provide free access. This quote from their representative John Loomis seems to cover the issue:

"Of equal importance to their technical accomplishments is their recognition that open access and open licensing adds value to the media documentation that they offer. The open terms of Creative Commons licenses enable users to incorporate these high-quality media items into new original works. Use of Creative Commons licenses makes sense, after all appeals to the "public interest justifies both funding and preservations laws and policies that support archaeology and historical preservation. These licenses help ensure that the members of the public can draw value and creative inspiration from the documentary record of the past."

However, as a wiki admin recently noted to me on an email, they did not provide a specific Creative Commons License under which they license their work; I will be writing them in hopes that they will provide specifics (and post them on their site, as that would be helpful to other people who might want to utilize this excellent resource). Hopefully they will write back soon, in the meantime I would greatly appreciate it if you didn't tag any more of the images for deletion, I wouldn't want to upload them all again. If it turns out that their license is invalid or they do not actually allow for CC use of such content, I will delete the images myself. Thanks! DuendeThumb 07:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Quest?

Hi, I did not understand because the image "Image:Rogerio_flausino.jpeg" was not accepted. It is on permisão of the "Brazil Agency". Other images with this permisão exist and that they had been accepted.

please it verifies correctly this permisão you will see that it is of free use, I I placed the credits of the detainer of the copyrights

Tanks.

Thanks for your effort. Yuval Y § Chat § 11:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks,

Please verifies emails in the list OTRS referring the images:[1], [2], [3]

Dej espindola ^Discussão 19:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amalie hessen.jpg

Dear Yuval, the image on this cover is PD-old, I assume PD-ineligible for text and composition. If you don‘t agree, please request normal deletion. Regards, Code·is·poetry 08:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The image is PD-old, the book is copyrighted. Please read Commons:Derivative works. Yuval Y § Chat § 19:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Which part of the cover is copyrighted? Code·is·poetry 20:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC) No crossposting, please

The cover itself..! Yuval Y § Chat § 21:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

As I said in my initial post: "I assume PD-ineligible for […] composition." Please try to argue related to my posts or just restore and nominate for deletion. Code·is·poetry 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with codeispoetry (and everybody else) in this issue. Why you as a Commons admin obviuosly don't even try to understand the simplest concepts of copyright is beyond my imagination. That you use "§" signs, of all signs, in your signature, is even more frustrating. In the future, please refrain from deleting images for reasons you don't seem to have a clue about. --AndreasPraefcke 10:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: PDF files

thanks! ViperSnake151 18:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)