User talk:Xenotron/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Xenotron, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Transrapid Shanghai maglev train ride.webm

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Transrapid Shanghai maglev train ride.webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 09:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Transrapid Shanghai maglev train ride.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 09:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

На какой станции находится поезд. Варианты ответов:

  1. Осиповичи-I
  2. Осиповичи-II
  3. Осиповичи-III

Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Судя по спутниковым координатам в файле — на 1-й. Xenotron (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Не нравится -- снимай сам. Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 11:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Да, не нравится, и главное — эта фотка для вики имеет нулевую ценность. Кроме поезда ни одного идентифицируемого объекта на фото нет, а поезд снят их рук вон плохо. Хорошие фотографий ДДБ1 на складе есть, а это — откровенный шлак с диким завалом горизонта и только частью поезда, не говоря уже о шумах и крайне низкой чёткости и формате. Чем грузить подобного рода "фотографии" снятые на какой-то древний калькулятор с диким завалом горизонта, если они не содержат что-то действительно уникального, при том что есть намного лучшие аналоги, лучше вообще не грузить. Xenotron (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Не следует путать области с отделениями железной дороги. Станция Солигорск относится к могилёвскому отделению Белорусской железной дороги, но к Минской области. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk • contribs) 06:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Ок, поправил, теперь она в Минской области Xenotron (talk) 07:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:TEM15-048.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TEM15-048.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Vinnytsya trams

Hello. It come to my attention, through my watchlist, that you have been working at renaming "Vinnytsya trams" to "Trams in Vinnytsya". I presume that you are doing it within a wider categorization work on this subject, aiming to document precisely each photo of Vinnytsya trams concerning all possible criteria (akin to what I have been doing with Lisbon trams). I will be monotorizing these files and subcats to witness the progress of your categorization work.

I invite you to join the discussion on the relative merits of naming this kind of categories "Trams in Cityname" versus "Cityname trams". As you can witness, I prefer the latter, but I refuse to accept as an argument for either solution the sheer number of categories using one or the other name form: Any categories newly created (or improved) by me will use the name form I prefer, but I will not resort to wholesale renaming in order to force a consensus. I will be awaiting your input at the said talk page.

(It may happen that you are renaming "Vinnytsya trams" to "Trams in Vinnytsya" not because you have a novel point of view on the matter of tram category names nor because you are working hard at categorizing Vinnytsya trams, but just for the sake of mindless “homogenization” and maybe trawling for editcount hits. In which case I’ll just undo your renamings at a later time.)

-- Tuválkin 23:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Unifying is good only if the unifying principle is sound. Please note that an often argument is along the lines of «Well, yes, "Cityname trams" may be better than "Trams in Cityname" but there’s no many of them it’s a hassle to rename them all». You’re unwitingly adding to this by renaming in this manner. Please read the the mentioned discussion and add there if you have questions or additional arguments either way. Please note that the sought harmonization is for all tram categories everywhere, not for all vehicles in Ukraine (or everywhere), as different vehicles have different categorization requirements. -- Tuválkin 20:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Which doesn’t trump improvement of naming standards, nor indeed the basic principle of any wiki. Please note that saying «I did this to match all the rest, without much thinking about it» is exactly what "mindless" means. A lot of our Commons work is mindless, and only a tiny fraction of it is mindless and wrong. -- Tuválkin 20:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Поезд Стриж ФПК (Talgo).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Retired electrician (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:ES1, Zdravnitsa - Pionerskaya.webm

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Tram_in_the_canton_of_Geneva has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


-- Tuválkin 14:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Просьба

Здравствуйте Xenotron. Вы можете тут, категории всех фотографий наладить? Cll 99 (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Могу. Но судя по названию этой категории смысл оставлять есть только те фото, где присутствует сам Ильхам Алиев — все остальные фото на которых президента нет нужно распределить только по подкатегориям Бакинского метро, включая поезда и станции — Xenotron (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Разница между 2 категориями

Не очень понимаю разницу между категориями Category:81-717/714 passenger interior и Category:81-717/714 interiors in Moscow Metro. С моей точки зрения, первая категория включает вторую (то есть, вторая — более узкоспециализированная, только по московскому метро). Тогда в чём смысл первой категории? Она, по идее, должна быть, надкатегорией второй категории. Сможете объяснить? :) В качестве примера файла взял File:Поезд «Великие полководцы», Константин Рокоссовский.jpg. --Brateevsky {talk} 15:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Не совсем так, салон включает не только собственно салон для пассажиров, но и кабину машиниста. Я просто сделал категоризацию по двум критериям — подвиду интерьера и месту съёмки. Первую категорию я создал чтобы чётко разделить интерьер в целом на пассажирский салон и кабину по аналогии с тем как у локомотивов интерьер разделён на кабину и машинное отделение, и чтобы в них для удобства просмотра были собраны все возможные варианты вне зависимости от метрополитена.
А категории по локациям могут включать как пассажирский салон так и кабину машиниста и служат для того чтобы фото с одной стороны можно было связывать с метрополитеном или линией а с другой чтоб фото салона были отдельно от фото самих поездов. Делить же например фото кабины по метрополитенам имхо будет излишне, а что касается пассажирского салона возможно при большом количестве это может иметь смысл но помимо того тогда фото кабины снятые в этом метро надо либо помещать в подкатегорию "кабины поезда серии 81-XXX в метро города-N" либо оставлять висеть уровнем выше, поэтому чтоб не делать чрезмерную категоризацию и по виду салона и по локации одновременно я избрал параллельный вариант.
Просто конкретно у "номерных" сделано очень много фотографий салона при считанных единицах лицензионно-свободных фотографий кабины машиниста. А вот например у музейных метровагонов вроде типа А или новых часто освещаемых в СМИ вроде 81-765 "Москва" фото кабины очень много, и разделение по двум критериям позволяет отобрать в один ряд чисто все фото кабин или салона для удобства навигации не создавая излишних разделений по месту съёмки, а с другой сделать привязку фото к поездам эксплуатируемым в конкретном метрополитене (в данных примерах — Москва и Баку). В целом же у поездов у некоторых зарубежных категорий может существовать ещё более сложная градация видов категорий — по модификациям, по номерам, по оператору, по стране, по линии, по окраске и т.п., у нас же это применяется пока лишь отчасти для некоторых серий. Xenotron (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Спасибо, вроде разобрался. :) Но я думаю, будущее всё же за более узкими категориями, хотя и эти не пропадут. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)