User talk:Xenophon/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Kammersberg - Dreikönigsfresco 2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Deine Siegelfotos

Hallo Xenophon, durch Zufall bin ich im Rahmen von Umkategorisierungen und Neuuploads auf deine Siegelbilder aus dem Dezember 2007 gestoßen. Ich habe mittlerweile angefangen einige davon zu überarbeiten, freizustellen oder zu säubern. Ich wollte dich nur darüber informieren und hoffe du bist damit einverstanden. ChristianBier (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Wirtshauszeichen

Hallo Wolfgang,

Wahnsinn [1], dein Image:Rothenburg - Hauszeichen - Gasthof zum Rappen.jpg! Ich hatte es nur beim Stöbern in neuen Dateien entdeckt und wg. „Hauszeichen“ im Dateinamen angeklickt. Mir waren früher schon Hauszeichen begegnet, ich habe auch selbst einige wenige fotografiert, aber noch nicht hochgeladen. Bei der Kategorie Hauszeichen scheint es sich aber nicht um Schilder vor dem Haus, sondern um Symbole am Haus zu handeln. Dazu paßt das Wirtshausschild nicht. M.E. passen die Hauszeichen aber auch nicht als Unterkategorie in die Kategorie Plaketten? mit vielen Länderunterkategorien, über die es indirekt zur Kategorie Zeichen gehört, weil doch ein Unterschied zwischen Plaketten, die m.E. auf einer Wand angebracht sind und oft Text enthalten, Zeichen, die m.E. in eine Wand eingebaut und oft bildnerisch gestaltet sind, und Schildern, die z.B. an einem Ausleger vor einem Wirtshaus baumeln, gibt. Das wird man wohl irgendwann neu ordnen müssen, speziell wenn die Niederländer mal anfangen, ihre Hauszeichen hochzuladen.

  • Namensstein „Die Kuh“
    Namensstein „Die Kuh“
  • Wirtshausschild „Zum Rappen“
    Wirtshausschild „Zum Rappen“
  • Plakette auf Jersey, was auch immer sie bedeutet
    Plakette auf Jersey, was auch immer sie bedeutet

Jedenfalls gibt es glücklicherweise noch eine Kategorie speziell für Wirtshausschilder, in die ich den Rappen noch zusätzlich gesteckt habe.--Timo Beil (talk) 12:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Teotihuacán - Markierstein am Ballspielplatz.jpg

Hallo, Wolfgang.

Please excuse my use of English - my Deutsch has grown rusty through the decades.

I like your photo of the Teotihuacan ballgame marker, and I am wondering whether you have a photo of the entire artifact. The Teotihuacan ballgame is unusual for a number of reasons, in particular because they did not use the typical stone ballcourts but rather (it seems) played on an open field using markers.

Although I guess that you would have uploaded any other photos, I thought I would ask.

Vielen Dank, Madman2001 (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry to learn that there's no photo of the entire ballcourt marker. However, while I was looking through your photos, I did see a very nice photo of the reconstruction of the Citadel which I included in the w:Temple of the Feathered Serpent article.
Vielen Dank, Madman2001 (talk) 20:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Arsenal Wien

Hallo Xenophon, Du hast vor nicht allzulanger Zeit zwei Bilder von historischen Stichen vom Wiener Arsenal beigesteuert und unter "Arsenal, Vienna" kategorisiert. Bist Du sicher, dass es sich um DAS Arsenal im 3. Bezirk handelt und nicht etwa um IRGENDEIN Waffenarsenal in Wien? Denn einerseits waren vor der Errichtung des heutigen Arsenals im 19. Jahrhundert an dieser Stelle nur Felder und andererseits hätte es wohl keinen Sinn gemacht, im 16. Jahrhundert ein Waffenarsenal weit außerhalb der Wiener Stadtmauern anzulegen. Vielleicht könntest Du bitte nochmal die Quelle/Herkunft der Bilder zu Rate ziehen (am schönsten wäre es überhaupt, die Quelle auch unter "Source" bei der Bildbeschreibung anzugeben, damit auch die anderen geneigten Leser die Herkunft kennen). Danke und schönen Gruß --Invisigoth67 (talk) 07:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Gibt es in der Familienchronik vielleicht einen Hinweis, wo im damaligen Wien sich dieses Arsenal befand? Vielleicht war es das Bürgerliche Zeughaus, siehe auch Militärische Einrichtungen in Wien. Wenn es keine Hinweise gibt, kann ich noch unseren Wiener Militärgeschichte-Experten drauf ansetzen, denn schließlich würden sich die Stiche hervorragend zur Bebilderung der passenden Artikel eignen. Viele Grüße --Invisigoth67 (talk) 08:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Xenophon, spät antworte ich, doch ich antworte. Ich glaube, ich kann das Rätsel um die Außenansicht des Arsenals lösen. Von diesem Bild wissen wir ja, dass der Künstler Jörg Kölderer war. Und über diesen Umweg habe ich diese Seite über das - immer noch existierende !! - Innsbrucker Zeughaus gefunden, auf der sich auch eine Version der Außenansicht, ebenfalls von Kölderer, befindet. Aber auch wenn man die beiden Schwarzweißen Stiche (Innen- und Außenansicht) vergleicht, deutet die Gebäudestruktur darauf hin, dass es sich um ein und dasselbe Gebäude handelt. Und last, but not least gibt es bereits einen Artikel über das de:Zeughaus (Innsbruck). Ich habe bereits alles um-kategorisiert, vielleicht solltest Du noch eine Umbenennung der beiden s/w-Stiche in Erwägung ziehen, um künftige Verwirrungen zu vermeiden. Weiterhin viel Freude bei der geschichtlichen Forschung und der Wikipedia-Arbeit wünscht --Invisigoth67 (talk) 06:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Foteviken Odin

The artwork in Image:Schonen-Wikinger Museum Foteviken 10.jpg looks like it is neither old nor permanently exhibited outdoors. Unless more information comes to light I think the photograph will have to be deleted as a derivative work. Haukurth (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I think it would hinge on whether it's permanently attached to an outer wall or not (the Swedish law says utomhus). If it is, that should be stated and Template:FOP added. If not, I think it needs to be deleted. Haukurth (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Or we could ask the manager of that museum, Sven Rosborn, who is an active wikipedian. --LA2 (talk) 02:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


Bethlehem und Hirten

Hallo Wolfgang
Vielen Dank für das Bild von Bethlehem mit Hirten
Es ist jetzt in meinem Video Bethlehem Down zu sehen
Bethlehem Down
Dwsolo (talk) 15:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Watashiwakawaii (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)watashiwakawaii

hi wolfgang. i was just wondering if you can help me. i tried uploading pictures that i took here in wikimedia.. first it got deleted. i uploaded it again, and tried to add infos. got deleted again. i uploaded it today. (hoping i did the right thing now) and i was wondering if you can help me find out whats wrong with my pics.. thank you. you can email me here potheadsk8rchik@yahoo.com thanks Watashiwakawaii (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)watashiwakawaii

oh it doesnt matter anymore, the article i wrote also got deleted XD i talked to the girl who deleted the article she says the model i wrote about is not "notable" enough.. (T_T) sorry for the super late reply by the way..

Category:Yamen in Tsingtau

Category discussion notification Category:Yamen in Tsingtau has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--J JMesserly (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

This is a rename to accepted international spelling Qingdao. Also applies to your cats:

-J JMesserly (talk) 02:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Nürnberg - Reichsparteitagsgelände.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nürnberg - Reichsparteitagsgelände.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nürnberg - Reichsparteitagsgelände.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Noddy93 (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the hint at the wrong license. I changed the license into Anonymous-EU, because the author of this postcard is anonymous and the postcard was apparently printed before 1939 ( see date of stamp ). So this license should be sufficient to keep the image in wikimedia. ( I did this sort of license at all the postcards I did upload up till now in accordance with a lengthy discussion I had about the licenses for them ).Xenophon 22:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hallo Wolfgang, das Problem ist, daß nur schwer festzustellen ist, ob sich der Urheber jemals zu seinem Werk bekannt hat, ob es also tatsächlich anonym ist (siehe Lizenzbaustein: "...the author never disclosed his identity"; siehe auch de:Anonymes Werk#Frühere Rechtslage in Deutschland / Übergangsrecht). Läßt sich irgendwie recherchieren, wer das Bild geschossen hat? Gruß, Noddy93 (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Murales Rivera - Markt in Tlatelolco 2.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Murales Rivera - Markt in Tlatelolco 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--El ComandanteHasta ∞ 15:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You placed a speedy delete tag on this image. I would like to know why. If murals of Diego Rivera are copyrighted, the whole category "Murales by Diego Rivera in the National Palace" has to be deleted plus numerous images in the Category "Diego Rivera". Please answer that question before deletion. Xenophon 21:20, 19 May 2009 ( UTC )
I didn't check if there were other reproductions of Diego Rivera's murales, but it seems that there are many others that have to be deleted. The reason is simply that Diego Rivera died less than 70 years ago, so the reproductions of his works are still copyrighted. But to be completely sure, I've asked it on the french version of Commons:Help desk. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 12:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your answer. Maybe one should take another aspect into consideration: Murales like that are quite often integral parts of public buildings. In fact the whole Category "Murals" consists of modern paintings at walls in public spaces. How far is a copy right of any artist valid in these cases? Is that a case of "freedom of panorama"? It seems to me that these problems need to be discussed - and solved - before any deletion. Regards Xenophon 17:30, 20 May 2009 ( UTC )
Like Sémhur recommended it to me on the Help desk, I've asked the deletion of all the files contained in the Category:Murales by Diego Rivera in the Palacio Nacional. You should expose your doubts there if you want to discuss about it. Regards. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 15:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xenophon/Archive_2&oldid=827781674"