User talk:Wsiegmund/Archive/2015/1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula scouleri 3224f.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 06:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phacelia sericea 4793.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erysimum arenicola 4711.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga cespitosa 4805f.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Reply:Redirection of gallery pages

Helli.Sometimes categories contain more images than gallery pages.So I make gallery pages redirects.thanks --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

That isn't a valid reason. A gallery page should include the best images chosen to illustrate the various aspects of the subject. Many don't reach that goal, but please work to improve them, or work on something else.

Please read the pages that I linked to on your talk page. Also, I looked at some of the deletion requests posted there. Please review COM:SCOPE. Most of the images, e.g., File:أوراق نبات ميتة 16.jpg, that I saw are not "realistically useful for an educational purpose." You may use GLAMorous to see files that others find useful.[1] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola flettii 4799.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and good quality. --Steindy 21:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus lepidus 4695.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shallow DoF, but it's adequately illustrative. --Ram-Man 01:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skagit River 8685.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skagit River 8667s.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smelowskia americana 4859.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I like it. But it must be denoised and sharpened. --Hockei 19:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Please have another look. --Wsiegmund 01:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --Bff 08:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Jesucristo-CapillaDivinoRostro-MDP1.jpg

Hi, how are you? I remove the disturbing objects in the background, see it please. Another day I´ll renominate it for QIC. Thank you for your review! Ezarateesteban 15:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Ezarate; Thank you for your greeting. As I said in my review, "my eye is drawn to the green of the bulletin board on the right." Removing the items on the bulletin board helps, but I am distracted by the green. Other reviewers may not feel the same. I'm curious to see their thoughts. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Formidable 8785s.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glacier Peak 8782s.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 11:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)