User talk:Whpq/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Whpq!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Panditji.jpg

I note that you have deleted the above file but it was taken by me at a function. I have spoken with the person in the photograph and he is ok with the picture. So what's the issue here?Wikishagnik (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Whpq,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Milton Velodrome

Are you living near to Milton? The velodrome is finished and it would be nice to have some new photos now :). --Nicola (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I was planning to get some pictures of the completed facility when I am next in the area. Cheers! -- Whpq (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
That would be fine, thank you! [1] --Nicola (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Problem there delete image 19 June 2017

I image cannot delete it not copyright non permission it self you deleted the file :( upload again --ToolWiki23 (talk) 09:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Mass deletion request of 5 images

Hello, Whpq. I do not understand why you would mass-nominate five of my images for deletion just because you noticed that I uploaded 'Jersey Journal Secaucus Headquarters.jpg' yesteImage:Foo.jpgrday. Those images have been there for years and have been labelled to be used only in the article to which they are subject of, which falls under fair use. No admin has had a problem with them. One of the images, for example, is from the 1930s and long in the public domain. Now you are forcing me to revisit and defect each upload. Each of those are solely used to visually describe the subject of the articles. If removed, they would leave their corresponding articles plain and without a single visual depiction. - Footballer99 (talk)16:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The images were not mass nominated. They were individually nominated with specific reasoning as to why I believe each has licensing issues. You claim that these images "falls under fair use". Do you understand that Commons does not accept fair use images? It's official policy. See Commons:Fair use. In any case, none of the images are stated to be used under fair use in the licensing, but the licensing statements are not supported with any evidence of the claimed license. If you believe that these images should be kept, you should make the case to keep them at each of the discussions. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
I must be mixing up the Jersey Journal Headquarters image with the other ones. There is an issue with the Bulgarian Wiki, however, which is the main reason for the misunderstanding. There is no option to upload an image to the local site, sometimes forcing me to upload to Commons. Do you have any idea how I can upload those locally so we can avoid such issues going forward? - Footballer99 (talk) 18:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
I am relying on machine translation of the Bulgarian Wikipedia upload link as I do not read Bulgarian. From what I gather in the translation, the Bulgarian Wikipedia no longer accepts non-free images such as movie posters, DVD covers, logos etc. So it appears they have simply directed any uploads to Commons since the type of acceptable licenses on that Wiki is the same as the licensing on Commons. So the short answer, is no, ther eis no way to place those non-free images on the Bulgarian Wikipedia as they are not acceptable content. For actual details, you will need to contact somebody on the Bulgarian Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for that. Strange, but apparently they have disallowed direct uploads. I have gone ahead and made my case for each of the images in question. Will work on the Jersey Journal Headquarters image issue tomorrow. The newspaper's page would be just too plain without it. Thanks again. - Footballer99 (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

Hi, I noticed you flagged one of my uploaded photos. The one related to the Cambrige journal ("File:Jnle March 2017.jpg") is a photo I have taken by my own mobile phone from the actual journal. It is not a direct copy from the website. I don't see why it is a violation. Omid.espero (talk) 14:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Taking a picture of a journal cover does not transfer the copyright to you. The copyright is still held by Cambridge University Press --Whpq (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Gokul mudhugavu pooja.jpg

Hey there, there was a small error providing the link to the source which has now been cleared and fixed. The link to the source is https://www.nowrunning.com/event/mudhugavu-movie-pooja/113277/. EXIF details detected is providing wrong information it seems. Also have uncategorized OTRS. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

The source site is clearly copyrighted with no free license. I have tagged this as a clear copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Sarah T Stewart planetary scientist McArthur Fellow Sept 2018.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sarah T Stewart planetary scientist McArthur Fellow Sept 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Whpq (talk) 12:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Stop marking images for deletion

Cease marking images such as Lord buckethead in a chair.jpeg etc for deletion, they have a legitimate purpose and have been sourced from the candidate's own site. EverettTheUrban (talk) 14:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The image is a copyright violation. There is none free license at the source site. - Whpq (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Image “MayMay Entrata shot by Owen Sarmiento 2018”

The image was given to me by the photographer using email and I chose to credit him.

Maywardjedi (talk) MayWard Jedi

In the file information, you claimed the image was your own work. That is clearly not true. There is no evidence that the image is available under a free license. In order to use that photo, you need to have the photographer provide the permission. See COM:PERMISSION Whpq (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Mid Engine Corvette Photo Copyright

I apologize for posting a copyrighted image. Understandable now. Chebbyzl1 (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyvios

Hello Whpq, Please do research before copyvio'ing any image - in the case of Lala Pons the video was under a CC licence upon upload and obviously CC licences are irrevocable, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Davey2010: The archive does not seem to behave properly for me. The usual "show more" which expands to show the license does not do anything, but I opened up the html source of the archive and found the CC licensing in there. I've added the archive link to the permission field on image file information. -- Whpq (talk) 20:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Ah okay fair point - I had that issue too, I originally tried the very first capture but the show more button didn't work for me either so tried another capture, Thank you for updating the link much appreciated! :), Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 21:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BriefEdits (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleting Photo Nepal first Historic Santali film Bonodal poster

Man, why you keep on delete my uploaded photo again and again I know the rules of copy right policy of wiki, I have permission to use the film poster from production house, its so hard to collect the information and you guys so easily with one enter delete the photo. @whpq: you supposed to see my page I am new on wiki may be I have to learn many think more and I am learning too. If I have done a mistake too, you supposed to send write a message that is called a respect, I know may be you have more experience on wiki. But for the poster I have the permission from Kiran Khatiwada who is the producer, director and from his production house this film was produced he gave me the permission to use it. So where I have fault to use this poster. Can you pls describe me what is the next solution would you give. --Zayakg (talk) 07:52, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

@Zayakg: When you uploaded the files, you asserted that these were your own work. From your message here, that clearly is not true. When it is somebody else's work, you need to provide proof that the image is under the license you claim. For these images, you will need to have the copyright holder provide proof of permissions / license. See COM:OTRS and find the section labelled "Licensing images: when do I contact VRT?" Follow the instructions for "I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons." -- Whpq (talk) 13:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

@Whpq: What kind of proof verification you need, can you please tell me in details. If you could say me this before I would follow the procedure and you guys so easily deleted the photo. before talking any steps you guys have to check in properly, not like directly deleted the stuff.--Zayakg (talk) 11:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@Zayakg: Read my previous response. It gives you a link with instrucitonons on what section to read. That section tells you what to do. -- Whpq (talk) 12:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:FEDMYSTER.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:FEDMYSTER.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Pokimane.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pokimane.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: dedicated license laundering flickr account, all images are screenshots from unfree stream [2]
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : BriefEdits.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Mi hai veramente scocciato, ora domani mando un email al comune di Venezia chiedendo tutte le autorizzazioni o contattando direttamente gli organi detentori del copyright del logo cosi se vogliono lo caricano loro sul wikimedia e sull'articolo relativo. Io ho semplicemente creato un logo in .svg dal loro logo. Io sono in assoluta buona fede. Non vi sta bene cancella pure tutto, me ne batto il cazzo. Non capisci l'italiano e allora puoi andare a fare inculo!!! E non carico più un bel cazzo su wikimedia. --Peter39c (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

A Question.🤔

Hi Mr Whpq, I hope you're doing fine today. Please I want to ask, if I should download a file I posted on another space e.g Google map and post that same file here on commons, am I still the copy right owner of that image? Remember I was the one that posted that same image in that space and maybe for some reasons, I no longer have that same image on my phone, and I decided to download from maps or the website I posted it so as to post the same image here for a purpose, hope I'm not doing anything wrong by posting that image and by putting my name as the original author? And if I can post that image will I post it as my personal stuff or post it as fair use? Please my questions may not be straight forward, but please try and answer them for me, I'm expecting a response from you soon. Thanks. --Idoghor Melody (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

@Idoghor Melody: You probably should ask your question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
@Whpq: Thanks for your response, but this was a question you could have answered, so why refer me? --Idoghor Melody (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Because I am not familiar with what level of proof is needed on Commons that to provide proof of copyright in this situation. -- Whpq (talk) 03:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
@Whpq: Thanks. I have been clarified at Commons: village pump/copyright --Idoghor Melody (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Magnifique sabotage !!!

Vous avez passé votre temps à supprimer ou faire supprimer des illustrations soit de stades, soit de logos. Le copyright est une bonne chose pour préserver les revenus des ayant droits, mais toutes les illustrations que vous supprimez ne rapporte rien à personne. Surtout les logo de clubs dont plusieurs cercle n'existent plus, soit sous ce nom, soit sous tout autre forme. Il s'agit d'éléments du patrimoine du football belge. Êtes vous Belge. Merci de répondre en Français. Toutes vos suppressions, ne font qu'une chose appauvrir l'encyclopédie et faire quie l'on n'ait plus envie de passer des journées entières à l'améliorer. Magnifique sabotage. --Shanon11 (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Shanon11: Bonjour,
Merci de rester poli et courtois.
Même si les droits d'auteur ne sont pas à notre avantage, il nous faut respecter autant que possible les lois en vigueur. Cela fait partie des règles de fonctionnement de Wikimedia Commons. Je suis disponible si vous avez des questions. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Merci de votre réponse. Mais... "rester poli", "courtois", où est-ce que j'ai fait preuve d'impolitesse et/ou de manque de courtoisie ??? Est-il possible - c'est mon bon droit d'exprimer une opinion différente - d'arrêter un ton hautain et supérieur, dès que l'on pense autrement que le "flicage en règle". Je ne remets nullement en cause l'application et le respect des droits d'auteurs MAIS quand ceux-ci existent et sont donc dus. Pour les photos... il y a peu à dire. Celles que vous supprimez proviennent pratiquement toutes de sites "amateurs" (donc déjà en ligne). Le plus souvent, elles le sont sans identifiant concret (photographes, agences, autres ayant-droits...). Elles sont généralement employées par plusieurs supports. J'ai passer 20 ans comme journaliste dans les divisions inférieures et en ai réalisé certaines, sans me souvenir de toutes celles concernées. Mais vous sabrer pour le plaisir. Pour les "logos" de clubs, c'est encore plus "bête". La plupart (quasi totalité) n'ont pas été "déposés" en bonne et due forme . Les "créateurs" ne sont pas connus et ne se font pratiquement jamais connaître. Les clubs concernés en sont plus utilisateurs que dépositaires. Il s'agit de visuels d'entités non professionnelles, dont, dans le cas de ceux supprimés ou proposés comme tels, beaucoup de clubs sont disparus (donc à qui est la nuisance ou l'indu, s'il y en a) ! J'ai juste voulu "améliorer" une encyclopédie (je parle du projet football en Français) qui ne ressemble plus à rien, est terriblement incomplet et lacunaire comparativement aux autres langues. On ne m'y prendra plus à passer des journées entières à dénicher des visuels. Je vous laisse continuer à imposer des règles voulues par une minorité incongrue. Supprimez ce que vous voulez, j'ai bien d'autres occupations bien plus importantes que de répondre à quelque inquisiteur de kermesse. Je vous prie donc, très poliment et très courtoisement, de me ficher la paix avec de pareilles futilités. Et bonne année tout de même (nous ne sommes pas encore le 15 janvier). (sé) Shanon11 13 Janvier 17h58. Shanon11 (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Sm3a

Hey Man, why you keep deleting the image I upload! 12:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sm3a (talk • contribs) 12:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sm3a: The reason for each deletion has been provided. If you have specific issues, you can challenge the speedy deletions or provide your comments in the deletion discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:34, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

JosephMartinFa

Hey man, why you are keep deleting the image I upload for miss universe myanmar 2020, I have permission for intellectual property to use by herself. I can provide email screenshot.Explain me why it should remove. Try me to challange. -- Whpq----JosephMartinFa (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@JosephMartinFa: An apology along with the removal of personal attacks would be nice. You stated that it was you own work when you uploaded the image. Your statement here indicates that is not true, and you are not the copyright holder as originally claimed. If you do have permission from the copyright holder, you need to follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to confirm licensing. Note that the copyright holder for a photograph is typically the photographer and not the subject of the photo. -- Whpq (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
@Whpq: And in this case, it is easier because photographer Aung Kyaw Tun is my friend. Easy Peasy.I will come back with copyright license. Thank you and this time I will try to control my temper.--JosephMartinFa (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

ஆனந்த் ராம்

It's is a duplicate of my image used in the website that was mentioned by you ஆனந்த் ராம் (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
What do you mean when you say "my image"? Are you claiming to be the copyright holder? The source for your uploaded image is a Flickr account with no indication that they are the rights holder for the image. The image itself appears to be a publicity photo in widespread use and predates the upload to the Flickr account. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Silat Barnstar.png

Hello, I object to the deletion of File:Silat Barnstar.png because the file is my own creation. What should I do so that the file is not deleted? 111.94.69.166 14:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry if I just messaged you using IP. What should I do so that the file is not deleted? Badak Jawa (talk) 14:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

You have incorporated a photograph in the barnstar without providing a source for that photo to show that it is freely licensed. -- Whpq (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

How can I fix? Badak Jawa (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

I got the Silat image from Canva Badak Jawa (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

You need to provide the actual source, as in a URL to the actual image used that shows it is under a free license, and provide any necessary attribution as required by the license. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm using the Silat image from https://www.freepik.com/premium-photo/two-men-wearing-pencak-silat-uniforms-fight-white_11707245.htm which has been published on Canva Badak Jawa (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

That links to Freepik. Their license restricts the inclusion of the image or any of its derivatives in a database or collection. Commons is a collection of images, so you may not use that image. It is not under a compatible free license. -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Done, what's next? Badak Jawa (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

What license is compatible for the image to work with? Badak Jawa (talk) 15:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

You can use any image that meets Commons:Licensing. The page includes a list of popular licenses. The image you currently are using does not meet the licensing requirement. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Whpq, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Whpq (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

File:180226 10 Stories 솔로 쇼케이스 성규 2.jpg

Hey Whpq, I was hoping you could review this file for me. I am using it on a featured list candidate on enwiki. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2018)/archive1. Thanks. EN-Jungwon 13:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

The licensing is a bit odd (see file talk page), but it looks okay so I have reviewed it and accepted it as a valid license. -- Whpq (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

User:Calonmenisback reuploading deleted logos again

Hi it seems that Calonmenisback is reuploading Philippine gov't logos again as their own work. Do note that their other uploads of places might be legitimate though. I've noticed that you've batch nominated his images before--Lenticel (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

You can do what Minorax did and tag with no permission. -- Whpq (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

About the removal of Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School & College article in Wikipedia

Whpq, Why did you delete an importan article on wikipedia. It is based on a real educational institution in bangladesh. It also avalible in bengali language in Bengali Wikipedia. I know user Rishad Talukdar is in violation of ban or block but When I See his replys on wikipedia other users he was a new member and he thought that new accout or many account may not fall him in this situation. He was trying to contribute in wikipedia for bangladesh school & colleges. I know User Rishad Talukdar did not follow the rules of wikipedia but his article is useful for wikipedia. Kindly forgive him and revert that article again.

The article name: Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School & College

Thank you 182.160.119.217 10:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

This Commons. If you want to raise an issue about my actions on the English Wikipedia, you should do so on my talk page there. I will not be replying to any more queries about this issue on my Commons user talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whpq/Archive_1&oldid=848843036"