User talk:Weglinde/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Karl Parsons

My uploads 33 to 39 are at risk of deletion over copyright issues.

Firstly it should be noted that I have written to the William Morris Gallery seeking permission to use the images but as they may need time to Come to a decison I ask that the current deadline of 24th March be extended.

Whilst I do understand that copyright is important I do feel that it will be rather silly if I eventually have to withdraw these Images!

They are in a catalogue for an exhibition held in 1987 and the text of the catalogue itself was typed. The catalogue was not published and has no ISBN.

If William Morris refuse use of the images then this out of print catalogue will languish on the bookcases of a few lucky owners And not see a wider daylight.

Having an interest in Parsons myself I was pleased to see what he looked like and enjoy his prowess as an artist in seeing his pencil drawings.

As far as the invitation to a private-view is concerned I would in any case challenge whether this would come under copyright law.

I hope here that common sense will prevail and that wikicommons will continue to hold the images.

Again I repeat that it is my intention to add some of the images to a wikipedia work on Karl Parsons.

I understand these messages can be read by all so if anyone would like to support my stance then that would be super. In the article it would be intention to mention the catalogue as a source of information. I would do so out of good manners rather that in the context of any copyright issues.

Weglinde (talk) 09:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of images and advice

.I uploaded the following images and inadvertantly stated that they were mine.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holy_Trinity_Blendworth_3.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holy_Trinity_Blendworth.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holy_Trinity_Blendworth_2.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holy_Trinity_Blendworth_5.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holy_Trinity_Blendworth_Tracery.JPG

The photographs were in fact takenb by Richard Bradshaw.

As a temporary measure I have changed the text to say that the images were taken by Richard Bradshaw and removed the licensing perameter.

I would now be grateful if someone could remove the images completely.

Just to repeat, the request to remove the images is made as the images were described as being taken by me but were not.

2. Should this situation arise again where I wish to upload an image taken by someone else, how do I upload to wikicommons and is it possible to then use the image in a wikipedia article. Would wikicommons in fact require the image to be uploaded by the person who took the photograph or in cases where I uploaded the image would wikicommons require the written consent from the actual taker of the photograph to use the image in a wikipedia article. What form would that written consent need to take? Would an e-mail have to be sent direct to wikicommons by the actual taker of the image? Advice would be appreciated.

See Commons:First steps/License selection and the decission tree there. You cant upload someone else photo unless the copyright holder gave permission to a free license. Under a free license it is possible to use a photo in Wikipedia. And not only Wikipedia. "Free" means that anyone can reuse the photo under that license, anywhere, anytime, for any purpose including commercial purposes and modification. --Martin H. (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Soissons JJJJ.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.124.112.36 21:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Long.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Compiegne 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ressons 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ressons 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ressons 7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ressons 8.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Bottiau 4.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 15:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Arras 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Victory Angel on Tourcoing War Memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Tourcoing War Memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

  •  Comment: In Canada where I live today and in Malaysia where I was born and lived until I was almost 16, we have full COM:FOP because both nations were former British colonies who follow British common law. Generally, a country which is a former British colony has FOP while former French colonies have no FOP since they follow French law but, of course, there are many exceptions! Both South Africa and Sri Lanka--which were former British colonies--do not have FOP whereas Algeria which was a former French colony has full FOP. Tunisia also has FOP...and it was a French colony but Morocco next door has NO FOP. Don't ask me why this happened. Just look at COM:FOP and the country if you have any doubts. BUT...the French laws are very strict on FOP unfortunately. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Sure its not a problem at all. Keep up the good work uploading images. Unfortunately, in Europe and the US, copyright lasts 70 years until the death of the original artist or architect--which is very long--whereas say in Japan and Indonesia, it is only 50 years. After 50 years there, the artist's work (sculpture, painting, engraving, etc) becomes copyright free and enters the public domain. This is also mentioned in the COM:FOP section for Japan and Indonesia. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Wrexham War Memorial.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 08:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau carving 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau carving 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau carving 11-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau carving 9.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau relief over chapel door.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau carving 14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau's America.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Chateau Thierry 44.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau's Two Figures.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Hand of friendship Chateau Thierry.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bottiau 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:L'inspiration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Meuse Argonne Heads on top columns-left.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Meuse Argonne Chapel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Brasseur Medallion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:La Pensee by Brasseur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue by Brasseur 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Woman with pigeon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Woman with pigeon 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Brest Railway Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Acy 5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Chateau Thierry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Familistere 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Familistere 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Familistere 4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Origny St Benoite.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin 1557.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin BBB.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin-refugees.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin XX.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin FFF.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin A.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin CC.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Quentin-1870.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Basilica 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Cardinal Pacelli (1876-1958) future Pope Pius XII .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Cardinal Suhard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Le Christ du Maître Autel de la Basilique de Lisieux (France).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Bob247 (talk) 02:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Dcoetzee (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PierreSelim (talk) 15:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate P. S. Burton (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Morning (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Morning (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Morning (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate — mantis [religiosa] — 19:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate — mantis [religiosa] — 19:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Havang(nl) (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Havang(nl) (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 14:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 레비Revi 03:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 레비Revi 15:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Labattblueboy (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Labattblueboy (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Labattblueboy (talk) 07:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 82.124.24.47 15:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 82.124.24.47 15:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:27, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 83.204.167.166 19:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 83.204.167.166 19:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 83.204.214.104 21:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 83.204.214.104 21:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 83.204.214.104 21:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --ghouston ([[User talk:Ghouston|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 86.217.15.161 20:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 86.217.15.161 20:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 86.217.15.161 20:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

int:wikilove-barnstar-kindness-title
Merci. GO69 ([[User talk:GO69|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 82.120.32.221 21:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stefan2 ([[User talk:Stefan2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --AldNonUcallin?☎ 03:35, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 03:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 90.43.195.225 14:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Chassipress ([[User talk:Chassipress|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Labattblueboy ([[User talk:Labattblueboy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Summary

Template:Information

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sennecaster ([[User talk:Sennecaster|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)