User talk:Wbartoszy
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Julien1311 06:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Patent_z_j_1984_r.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Patent_z_j_1984_r.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Patent_s_j_1986_r.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Patent_s_j_1986_r.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Patent_zj_a.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Patent_zj_a.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 00:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
File:POL województwo dolnośląskie COA.svg[edit]
Zrobione. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 19:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Port morski Nowy Świat - mapa BHMW.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Port morski Nowy Świat - mapa BHMW.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Port morski Nowy Świat - mapa BHMW.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Wyspa Estyjska - fragment mapy morskiej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aotearoa (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Z polskimi mapami urzędowymi jest ten problem, że jednak nie są traktowane jak dokumenty urzędowe. Na mapach topograficznych i nawigacyjnych umieszczany jest znak (C). Gdyby mapy nawigacyjne i topograficzne nie były objęte prawem autorskim, to bez problemu byłyby zamieszczane na różnych stronach internetowych. Zrównanie map nawigacyjnych/topograficznych z dokumentem urzedowym jest nadinterpretacją. Aotearoa (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Być może że uznanie mapy za "dokument urzędowy" to lekka nadinterpretacja. Ale uznanie mapy za "materiał urzędowy" już taką nadinterpretacją nie jest. A także "materiałów urzędowych" nie obejmuje ochrona prawno-autorska. Bo przecież pochodzi od urzędu i (jeśli się zgodzimy) nie jest dokumentem, a powstały w na podstawie ustawy o obszarach morskich. Naprawdę nie widzę tu pola do interpretacji: albo dokument, albo materiał. Tak czy siak = nie copyright.
- Filozoficznie: przecież zleciliśmy wykonanie (uchwalając ustawę) i zapłaciliśmy za przygotowanie tego (płacąc podatki) więc właścicielem jest państwo = społeczeństwo. Mapa ta nie ma nawet unikalnego charakteru (dobór kolorów, symbole) bo wszystko jest zgodne z S-52 i S-57...
- A umieszczenie znaku (c) - nie ma żadnego znaczenia: [1]
- Wbartoszy (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Tu ani moja, ani Twoja interpretacja nie ma znaczenia, istotne jest, co faktycznie na ten temat mówią eksperci, jakie wyroki wydają sądy. Sytuacja jest dość jednoznaczna, a zaklinanie rzeczywistości, że to "dokumenty", że z naszych podatków itp. nie zmienia faktu, że tego typu mapy "urzędowe" są uznawane za dzieła podlegające pod przepisy prawa autorskiego. Tu przykładowy fragment artykułu dotyczący map topograficznych, gdzie jest wprost podane: "Prawa autorskie na opracowania kartograficzne obowiązują przez 70 lat i nikt nie chce się narażać na procedury sądowe." Mapy nawigacyjne są tym samym typem publikacji co mapy topograficzne. Aotearoa (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)