User talk:Vivo/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bispbergs gruva Bergslagssafari 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 21:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carls stoll Bergslagssafari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftstation Bergslagssafari 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftstation Bergslagssafari 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftstation Bergslagssafari 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fd mejeriet Garpenbergs gård Bergslagssafari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment File needs English description to be categorized in Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted. Sorry and thanks--Lmbuga 14:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
That's new to me. Thanks! I've updated the description.--Vivo 07:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenbergs herrgård Bergslagssafari 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Atamari 01:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jennie Johansson Hedemora 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftstation Bergslagssafari 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very moody. Not the standard fare, but QI to me. --Crisco 1492 13:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asks kyrka 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asks kyrka 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svalövs kyrka 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments First I thought it would be a painting. Good quality -- Spurzem 15:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kyrka Bergslagssafari 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality (if it's not tilted). --C messier 14:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schultska epitafiet, detalj, Hedemora kyrka 2015-09-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Swedish WLM quality images

Please see my edit summaries at [1] and [2]; I declined some of your requested deletions because you made a small mistake, so I didn't know what you were intending to do. Nyttend (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, @Nyttend: , I think my mind got messed up by categorizing all sorts of Quality images of Sweden. Now I think it should be about right. :) Vivo (talk) 21:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Click the diffs again. Thanks for the help! Nyttend (talk) 21:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predikstolen Hedemora kyrka 2015-09-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svalövs kyrka 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perssonska gården 2015-09-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overprocessed, grainy and CA's. Sorry, but for me it's not a QI. --Halavar 21:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
New version up. Better?--Vivo 23:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support Yes, much better. QI for me now. --Halavar 10:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caterpillar 231D LC Tjärnan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 11:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caterpillar 231D.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasakyrkan 2015-09-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Palauenc05 22:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Takkrona mittskepp 2-01 Hedemora kyrka 2015-09-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak pro. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 01:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perssonska gården 2015-09-25 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. It's a little bit noisy. --XRay 09:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
New version up. Better? --Vivo 17:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perssonska gården 2015-09-25 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Too much noise. --XRay 09:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
New version up. Better? --Vivo 17:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support IMO OK now. --XRay 16:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perssonska gården 2015-09-25 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Noisy and the bicycles bottom right are disturbing. --XRay 09:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
New version up. Better? --Vivo 17:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support IMO OK now. --XRay 16:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment CA correction needed. --Carschten 20:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Reworked, as good as it gets without losing green on machine.--Vivo 08:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 Support very good! --Carschten 22:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96, John Deere 6620 Västerby 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 03b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96 Västerby 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CLAAS Dominator 96, John Deere 6620 Västerby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~ Nahid Talk 13:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Nahid! Vivo (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Deere 6620 Västerby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 15:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Deere 6620 Västerby 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Vivo, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset in Hedemora 2015-10-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alla helgons dag Garpenberg 2015, bisättningshuset 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it's quiet difficult to make a good photo in those weather conditions, but quality is good --Michielverbeek 23:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Please..

complete your last QI nomination. --Hubertl 17:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. Thank you, Hubertl. But it took me a while to figure out what you meant. --Vivo (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storstugan Hedemora gammelgård 2015-06-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit on the bright side but a quality image for me. --Ximonic 18:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SJ Rc 1383 Stockholm Central.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I made it a litte bit darker. Still ok?--Vivo 09:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:SJ Rc 1383 Stockholm Central.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SJ Rc 1383 Stockholm Central.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fd Köttbesiktningen Hedemora januari 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Carls stoll Bergslagssafari.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carls stoll Bergslagssafari.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geovetenskapens hus U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geovetenskapens hus Y.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geovetenskapens hus R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Minor green CAs at the branches.) --XRay 16:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please, apply a perspective correction, the leaning, specially on the left, is very significant Poco a poco 18:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Perspectives corrected.--Vivo 16:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clara Henry Hedemora bokhandel 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geovetenskapens hus S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Clearly tilted Poco a poco 18:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Perspectives corrected.--Vivo 16:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
I am afraid you went a bit too far, now they are leaning outwards Poco a poco 18:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for valuable cc. One last try, if it's not good now, decline it. --Vivo 21:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
You cropped the last version but didn't apply any perspective correction. I have given it a try. Now we need a third opinion --Poco a poco 15:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 Comment It is a bit overcorrected at the left (the right is OK). --C messier 14:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
True, ✓ fixed Poco a poco 19:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 Support --C messier 09:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulleråker 2016-04-28 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silvköparens camping 2016-04-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulleråker 2016-04-28 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olof-Jons damm 2016-04-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulleråker 2016-04-28 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 22:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Frostbrunnsdalen

Den 19 maj ska SPF Seniorerna Falun ha en "skogsvandring" I Frostbrunnsdalen. När jag la ut information om detta på föreningens webbplats http://www.spfpension.se/default.asp?nodeid=12129 tog jag mig friheten att illustrera med din bild därifrån. Med vänliga hälsningar, Bo Bävertoft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperboré (talk • contribs) 08:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hej Hyperboré! Vad kul! Vivo (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mats Strandberg Hedemora gammelgård.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 09:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svedbosjön 2016-04-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långforsen 2016-05-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:NH 65 Hyd.jpg

Hello!

This is regarding your comment on the June 28, 2016 quality image nomination for the subject file name. I have reduced the exposure value. Can you please check? Thanks in advance! :) Nikhil (talk)

Hi Nikhil! Thanks for notifying. Vivo (talk) 11:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nävden 2016-04-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, very good landscape. --Marrovi 04:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissjön 2016-04-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garpenbergs gruvkapell May 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garpenbergs gruvkapell May 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haffnerska villan 2017-02-19 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice but the vertical white line is disturbing--Lmbuga 18:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlmanska huset 2017-02-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasaskolans och Martin Koch-gymnasiets aula 2017-03-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dräckes Mina Aronssons gård 2017-02-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos-Kalles 2017-03-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some CAs (see the note) --Halavar 00:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Halavar! New version up. Better? --Vivo 00:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 Support Yes, much better. QI for me --Halavar 11:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora kyrka 2017-03-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjurfors bruk 2017-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lillsjöns utlopp i Bjurforsbäcken 2017-02-08 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A T Antonsson-mangel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A T Antonsson-mangel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. As good a crop as you can get in such a machine, there will always be parts that get cropped. --W.carter 09:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A T Antonsson-mangel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A bit noisy, and there are green chromatic aberration. All fixable.--Peulle 11:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
@Peulle: New version up. Better? --Vivo 13:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Yes, better. :) --Peulle 19:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bersen 2016-08-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 17:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Värlingen 2017-05-12 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice scenery! Could you remove the CAs (on the rock, on some trees, on the grass), please? --Basotxerri 20:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for noticing, Basotxerri! New version up, better? Vivo 14:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Better, OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myntparken Hedemora 2017-07-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silverhyttan 2017-06-29 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora kyrka 2017-08-04 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storgatan Säter 2017-12-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Storgatan Säter 2017-12-03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Storgatan Säter 2017-12-03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora kyrka 2017-08-04 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora rådhus 2018-10-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fasta paviljongen Säter 2019-04-08 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fasta paviljongen Säter 2019-04-08 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fasta paviljongen Säter 2019-04-08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 12:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Jälken 2019-07-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spraxkya 2019-07-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessesjön 2019-07-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo reference would be good --Podzemnik 00:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Gransjön 2019-08-13 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slogbod vid Lissjön 2019-08-06 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slogbod vid Skitjärn 2019-08-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuppdammen 2019-06-10 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gussarvsgatan med Teaterladan 2019-08-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos-Kalles gård 2019-08-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenbergs gruvkapell 2019-08-30 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Sharp even at 100%, good exposure, balanced composition. --Bobulous 17:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Vivo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garpenbergs gruvkapell 2019-08-30 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garpenbergs gruvkapell 2019-08-30 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Vivo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Björkljustern 2020-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great!--Famberhorst 05:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Nu är det snart dags: Wiki Loves Earth 2020!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Earth. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker i tävlingen – men i år har vi också lagt till biosfärområden och naturminnen! Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. På grund av Covid-19 kan inga gemensamma evenemang anordnas i år, så passa på att fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Misstag

Jag satt och gick igenom några av mina gamla bilder och råkade av misstag redigera en av dina bilder i tron att den var min. Jag har återställt. Hoppas allt är bra med dig och familjen!--ArildV (talk) 11:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Haha, förbättringar är alltid välkomna, ArildV. This is a wiki, you know. :) Vivo (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Vivo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Nu presenterar vi vinnarna i Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hej,
(For information in English, see here.)
Årets WLM-jury har efter hårt kämpande och stor vånda kommit till ett resultat, och på fredag 11 december, 10.00 (SNT), tar vi första steget i tillkännagivandet när vi i en livestream på youtube presenterar de tio bilder som går vidare till internationella finalen. Du, och alla andra, är välkommen att vara med när bilderna presenteras av Eric Luth och Johanna Berg.
Passa även på att boka in 15 januari då pallplatserna kommer att tillkännages under födelsedagsfirande i samband med Wikipedias 20-årsdag. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)