User talk:Valerio Bozzolan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Valerio Bozzolan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tb[edit]

Hello, Valerio Bozzolan. You have new messages at File talk:Usage share of web servers (Source Netcraft).svg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File:F-Droid client it.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undo[edit]

Scusa se ho annullato, la tua trascrizione sulla talk del file ma credo che sia fuori luogo. L'oracolo esiste anche, ed è scritto in cima, implicitamente. per essere un luogo dove essere meno Wikimediani, per scherzare e per essere meno formali e per divagare ogni tanto come si fa sui forum, che in wilipedia è vietato. Se l'autore dell'icona legge quello che è stato scritto potrebbe pensare che lo stiamo prendendo in giro. In realtà le battute fatte all'oacolo non prendono mai in giro nessuno sono una specie di competizione a chi è più spiritoso, le domande sono solo un occasione. Tieni presenti che gli stranieri non solo sono molto più formali di noi italiani, non capiscono l'humor italiano, e sopratutto non conoscono le dinamiche dell'oracolo. Tra l'altro quanto riportato comunque non è costruttivo, non aggiunge nulla alla discussione, perciò rischierebbe di sembrare come se l'avvessi fatto apposta trascrivere per deriderlo quando sono sicuro del contrario, assolutamente sicuro delle tue buone intenzioni. Tieni presente che noi tutti italiani siamo un po' irresponsabili a volte, qualcuno ha nominato test psicologici in quelle risposte, per esempio, visto da fuori potrebbe essere molto offensivo. E soprattutto ti dico questo per esperienza, anche a me piace scherzare molto e ho capito, sbagliando, che non si può ovunque e non sempre nello stesso modo, nel mondo wikipediano internazionale--Pierpao.lo (listening) 09:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Gentilini[edit]

Discover why Category talk:Marco Gentilini is empty. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 01:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also Category:Christian Peluso --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also Category:Giancarlo Pesare --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Asd.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Task 4 is approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conratulascions File:Asd.gif--Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | Österreichisches Deutsch | Schweizer Hochdeutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/−


When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola tc 13:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Apalsola: Thank you my dear, but can I ask you what contribution we are talking about? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This one. Category:Tuomas Sammelvuo already is a sub-category of Category:Players of Finland men's national volleyball team which in turn is a sub-category of Category:Men's volleyball players from Finland. Thus Category:Tuomas Sammelvuo should not be added directly to Category:Men's volleyball players from Finland. Best regards, ––Apalsola tc 00:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category talk:Females performing fellatio has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.79.133.189 14:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fun fact is that the only thing I've writed down about that category is: «OK, today I've found the latest page of the Internet :^)». Good by, latest page of the Internet! It was a pleasure to meet you before your deletion. asd --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Fabian Plak (Legavolley 2019).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Clearly 2017 work from Ronald Hoogendoorn, see here in high res with watermark. So Lega Pallavolo Serie A is NOT Author of this picture.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

D'Arch (talk) 07:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fabian Plak (Legavolley 2019).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Valerio Bozzolan, could you please comment to the problem with this image (image not found under claimed source & likely copyrighted by other photographer Ronald Hoogendoorn). Otherwise you might endanger the validity of the LegaVolley ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Thank you! I've contacted my friend @CristianNX: involved in the public relations with Wikimedia and Legavolley and I think he will contact you soon. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Compleanno Wikimedia Italia 2020 04 Valerio Bozzolan.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Compleanno Wikimedia Italia 2020 04 Valerio Bozzolan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: I absolutely do not understand what this damn bot want from this image with Template:Extracted from and Template:Public domain. Can I offer you a pizza for this help? asd --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Qualcuno ha inserito la licenza sbagliata. --Ruthven (msg) 12:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wikimania 2021 surveillance edition parody promo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralf Roletschek 14:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lega Volley[edit]

Ciao. Sai se le foto autorizzate della Lega Volley debbano essere obbligatoriamente solo quella del profilo o può andare una qualunque dell'atleta presente nel sito? --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kasper2006: Foto tipo? :D Chiedo a @CristianNX: --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kasper2006: Le foto autorizzate sono solo quelle delle schede dei singoli giocatori, non le altre presenti nel sito di Legavolley. --CristianNX 16:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Артём 13327 (talk) 09:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao. Alla lodevole opera di aver inserito nella categoria tutti i monumenti significativi di importaza regionale in Ticino, noto tuttavia che spesso essi posseggono solo questa categoria mentre manca quella del relativo comune. Li ho controllati a tappeto uno per uno ed inserito le categorie dei relativi comuni dove mancavano. Vorrei pregarti, qualora tu avessi creato altre categorie simili, di controllare tu stesso che i vari monumenti siano anche collegati in categoria ai comuni in cui essi ricadono. Grazie.

DenghiùComm (talk) 16:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asd.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 10:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again? Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 15:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia[edit]

(English version available here)

Ciao Valerio Bozzolan, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

File:Message on a bottle help.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 03:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 12:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giant Linux kernel tux mascotte at Linux Day 2022 in Milano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]