User talk:Vaido Otsar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vaido Otsar!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Vaido Otsar,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse 2012[edit]

Fotovõistlus Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse toimub ka sel aastal. Pilte saab lisada septembrikuu lõpuni. Oled oodatud osalema! --WikedKentaur (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Vaido Otsar,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 11:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piusa koopad 2011 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rõuge Kaussjärv 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Two dead pixels imo (see notes) but they're easy to fix : QI. --JLPC 18:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Fixed --Iifar 19:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamula järv 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 22:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väimela Alajärv 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Strange red spot (natural or not?), note added. --Iifar 15:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 11:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Esitasin sinu Piusa koobaste pildi ka Commonsi eeskujulike piltide kandidaadiks. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luke mõisa kärnerimaja 2010 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 08:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muhu Katariina kirik 2011 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, clean, QI-Godot13 08:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaimela maejarv 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 12:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vastseliina piiskopilinnuse kirdetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Need english description, otherwise QI imo. --ArildV 09:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Kruusamägi 11:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Support--ArildV 20:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väimela mõisa vankrikuur 2011-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me.--S. F. B. Morse 08:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piusa liivamaardla 2011 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks like photo of dunes in forest. Would be much better if made other way around - from down forest towards sand. SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment When looking at map, then it seems that the photographer used the place where there is the most of sand quarry visible and right behind him were also trees. Kruusamägi 21:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 08:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roosisaare rippsild 2011 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Kas panoraamivabadusega on asi korras? --Iifar 08:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Sild tundub küll vähemalt mulle piisvalt kaugel ja väike olema selleks, et seda põhimotiiviks mitte pidada. Kruusamägi 10:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment Kahjuks ma ei saa nõustuda, vt palun faili nime ja kirjeldust. --Iifar 12:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Kirjeldus kirjelduseks. Seadusandlus pildiinfo kohta küll midagi ei lausu ja rohkem on ikka seda veekogu jms. Kruusamägi 17:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Vaata võrdluseks näiteks seda pilti. Kruusamägi 14:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment When using English Wiki Commons, please, write in English. Thank you. SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 08:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaade Suure Munamäe vaatetornist 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A lot of dust (allocated for the photos).. --Aleks G 00:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC) Fixed. --Aleks G 22:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vaade Suure Munamäe vaatetornist 2013 02.jpg, which was nominated by Kruusamägi at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vaade Suure Munamäe vaatetornist 2013 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haanja 2010 01 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haanja 2010 01 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Vaido Otsar,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varstu paisjärv 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebasmäe allikas 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 19:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fail Suur Taevaskoda 2010 01.jpg on ka QI. Ma küll ei tea, et kuhu selle teavitus jäi :) Kruusamägi (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Vaido Otsar,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste kirik 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Böhringer 06:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võru pangahoone Tartu tn 25 - 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Böhringer 06:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roti vesiveski hooned ja pais 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roti veskiveski aida uks 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vana-Nursi mõisa peahoone 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good I find. --Hockei 20:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaade Suure Munamäe vaatetornist 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalda järv 2007 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nie,--Famberhorst 05:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suur Munamägi 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prohvet Eeliase kirik Vasknarvas 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste kirik 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Härma alumine müür 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kubija järv 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verijärv 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 12:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verijärv 2009 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rõuge Suurjärv 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 12:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viitina Alajärv 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit too much contrast, but ok --Poco a poco 17:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahja jõgi 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tempts me to look for some fish. –Be..anyone 02:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahja jõgi 2010 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valgesoo raba 2010 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture. --Hockei 18:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamula järv 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Väikjärv 2011 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Väikjärv 2011 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Ahja_jõgi_2013_06.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! –Be..anyone (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesvaine loss 5015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kihelkonna kirik 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kihelkonna kiriku kellatorni sisevaade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kihelkonna kiriku kellatorn 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste surnuaia kabel 2 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste surnuaia värav 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa peahoone 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa piirdemüür 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanariku järv 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilsi Kõrbjärv 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 17:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manilaid 2015 07 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Better with a closer crop (less unsharp area at the bottom). --XRay 17:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kanariku järv 2015 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kanariku järv 2015 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2009.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Haanja 2010 01 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haanja 2010 01 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Koordinaadid[edit]

Küsiksin nende kolme pildi juurde ka koordinaate:

Kruusamägi (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Väimela Mäejärv 2011 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Väimela Mäejärv 2011 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef glacier 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good, but could be better. Why ISO 800 and 1/1.600 s? IMO ISO 100 would be better. And it looks oversharpened. And for this kind of image the resolution should be better, especially with your camera. --XRay 12:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support likely a downsampled image, though it is better to have higher resolution it's a good quality image IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Sailing vessel Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Sailboats, in July 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailing vessel Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sailing vessel Rembrandt van Rijn[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sailing vessel Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sailing vessel Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, All merits are for you. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ToroToro canyon 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Maarja Nuut Viljandi folgil 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maarja Nuut Viljandi folgil 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohevint Võrumaal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohevindi paar 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Pretty good! --Podzemnik 03:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalda järv 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osmussaare pank 2017 07 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Please add geolocation if you can. --Basotxerri 15:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC) I added one line to the description about that. As I'm not sure, what was the exact point from where the image was taken, then I'd prefere to not mark the coordinates myself. @Vaido Otsar: Kruusamägi 17:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osmussaare pank 2017 07 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture People playing Xiangqi.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Traditional games, in June 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Tartu Raekoda 2016 12.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Town halls, in March 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]