User talk:Marianne Casamance/Archives 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Vandalisme ?![edit]

Vandalism warning

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tok Pisin  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float 
You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

DieBuche (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talking about ? on which sujet i may make a mistake ? I don't understand. My way on commons is not vandalisme, but only fowording pictures, or clarified sometime unclassified file. So, if i made a mistake whit one of yours, could you named this file ? Véronique PAGNIER 21:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism warning[edit]

But why did you empty this page: [1] ?--DieBuche (talk) 23:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, did you want it deleted? Then put this on to the page {{speedy|reason why it should be deleted}}--DieBuche (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Valérie,

Tout d'abord, et comme indiqué ci-dessus, n’hésites pas à passer sur le Commons:Projet Monuments Historiques français !

Je constate que tu as eu droit à quelques paroles peu amènes plus haut... Désolé, je sais combien c'est pas agréable de recevoir un pareil message. Comme l'explique DieBuche (après coup...), sur Commons on ne blanchit pas les pages lorsqu’elles ne sont pas/plus utiles. Tu peux apposer le modèle {{Speedy delete}} pour qu'un admin s'en charge, demander sur le Bistro ou même sur ma page de discussion, je me ferai un plaisir de m'en occuper.

Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atelier photo, le Retour[edit]

Bonjour,

l'atelier photo qui avait lieu ce week-end s'est suffisemment bien passé pour que l'on envisage d'en organiser d'autres éditions. Comme tu avais exprimé de l'intérêt sans pouvoir venir, je me permets de t'écrire en priorité pour te demander s'il y a des lieux ou des dates qui t'arrangeraient ou te sembleraient pertinents. Si tu as des idées, tu peux les soumettre sur User talk:Rama/atelier photo 2.

Merci et peut-être à un de ces jours ! Rama (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ta proposition...[edit]

Un atelier photo, c'est un concept sympa... mais Paris, Suisse ou Toulouse, c'est tout trop loin et en ce moment je dois faire très attention à mes dépenses... peut-être une autre fois. --Jmrosier (dit Ampon) (talk) 09:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trollage[edit]

Bonjour Véronique,
Peux-tu t'occuper du cas de Wikitrash qui vient prolonger sur Commons le trollage qu'il a effectué sur WP:fr ? Ce contributeur n'est pas là pour contribuer à l'enrichissement de l'encyclopédie.
Merci. Salutations. Gemini1980 (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cépages[edit]

Hello Véronique, since Commons:Language policy states that "category names should generally be in English", I have proposed to move the Category:Cépages you created to Category:Grape varieties. See Category talk:Cépages. Regards, Tomas er (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altars of PACA[edit]

Bonjour. Je viens de repondre a vos questions sur ma page de discussion. Cordialement. Olivier2 (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Figues_et_parme.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

MorganKevinJ(talk) 03:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Clapas ou bergerie ?[edit]

Bonjour,

Une bergerie ne peut être un clapas que si elle est effondrée et réduite à un tas de pierres. Etes-vous sûre que c'est le cas pour le clapas du plateau d'Albion, il m'avait semblé que c'était une cabane double faisant office de bergerie ?

Cordialement,--Erussal (talk) 22:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

dofification faite Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Bandol - Rouge & Rosé.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

. Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Plage Bandol.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

. Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Vineyard Bandol.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

. Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bargemon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

NC-restricted on Flickr source. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Mémorial col des Abeilles.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

When was this memorial built? Regrettably there is no FOP-exemption in France, thereby likely a copyvio. Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Marianne Casamance!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done correction faite Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sérignan_-_J_H_Fabre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grcampbell (talk) 23:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamp_Chypre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Philafrenzy (talk) 12:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avignon_-_Rotondes_SNCF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trizek here or on fr:wp 15:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"No FOP in France"[edit]

Bonjour Véronique PAGNIER,

Je viens de supprimer une de tes photos qui représent un bâtiment récent (un édicule Guimard). Il n'y a en effet pas de liberté de panorama en France, et même si c'est bien dommage, Commons se doit de respecter cette interdiction.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
La photo supprimée temporairement est File:Station botzaris.JPG.
Peu importe la photo finalement, l’« erreur » est que Hector Guimard est mort est 1942. Il faut donc attendre le 1er janvier 2013 pour que les représentations de ces œuvres soit dans le domaine public. Pour tout les bâtiments récents (disons de moins de 140 ans), il faut toujours faire attention à la date de la mort de l’auteur. Si celui-ci n’est pas mort depuis 70 ans (en année calendaire complète), alors la photo ne peut pas être importer sur Commons.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Alauzier[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de tomber sur deux de tes photographies : File:Bollène - Hotel Alauzier.jpg et File:Bollène - Hotel Alauzier 2.jpg. Les identifiants Mérimée sont erronnés.

Pourrais-tu me confirmer qu’il s’agit bien du PA00081974 ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Centrale André Blondel[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miniwark (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:SavondeMarseille.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

(talk) 20:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petits travaux en cours[edit]


quelques travaux sont en cours ou à venir :


Pour le portail Vignes et Vin :

  • Vignes et vignobles
  • Cépages

sur la Vallée du Rhône, Paris, et pourquoi pas la région Sud Est


Pour les portails Avignon et Vaucluse :
compléments de photos sur les communes de la région


Pour le portail Gastronomique :
diverses photos, en plus de la gourmandise ......


Pour le portail Monuments Historiques :
compléments sur les monuments du Vaucluse, et plus si affinité ...


Pour le reste, au gré du vent (ou du Mistral), suivant les envies et les besoins ...


File:Big_Foot_à_Quinson.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 15:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eglise Sainte Thérése de l'enfant Jésus, paroisse de Villeneuve lès Avignon (Les Angles).JPG[edit]

Salut Véronique !

Ta demande de renommage du fichier en titre, outre le fait qu'elle n'est pas dûment motivée comme le demande Template:Rename, me gêne un peu car j'ai du mal à lui attribuer une motivation légitime selon Commons:Renommer un fichier#Quels fichiers peuvent être renommés ?.

Pourrais-tu s'il te plait préciser voire argumenter ce point ? Merci d'avance ! Papatt (talk) 01:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Papatt,
Villeneuve lès Avignon et Les Angles sont 2 communes différentes. L'église Sainte Thérèse est sur Villeneuve et non sur les Angles. La notion Les Angles doit donc disparaitre. Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 04:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Et tu noteras s'il te plait que, dûment complétée, ta demande a été traitée par un copain dans la foulée. Comme quoi un peu de rigueur ... ;) Papatt (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tu dis vrai Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 18:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pour conclure, je vais te demander un truc qui peut t'être utile : si tu tombes sur beaucoup de fichiers qui mériteraient d'être renommés, n'hésite pas à me dresser une liste (avec motif et nouveau nom), ça devrait être plus rapide que des demandes particulières. @ + ! :) Papatt (talk) 23:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Marianne Casamance,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Central_André_Blondel_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Marianne Casamance!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Langue ... "de le" = "du"[edit]

Bonjour Véronique ! Pardonne-moi !... Je viens de tomber sur ta catégorisation des clichés d'une église du Pas-de-Calais. Je tique un peu ... et je pense qu'il faut corriger, car on ne dit pas "l'église de Le Wast", mais "l'église du Wast", de même que l'on dit "la ville du Tréport" et non "la ville de Le Tréport". Je te laisse faire le nécessaire ? Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 08:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sablet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fort good, voyez-vous. Smile Véro. --JPS68 (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice - 3 Côtes du Rhône.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments in vino veritas--Jebulon 23:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arles - hall Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Awsome place, and difficult to photograph. QI for me. --Coyau 07:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratoire croix couverte 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The sky is a little noisy. Is it the "real" angle of the building ? Léna 00:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC) -- About the sky, full Mediterranean sun of September! For the angle, the building has a triangular base. Véronique PAGNIER 18:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC). -- Ok, QI for me :) Léna 23:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I requested its deletion instead of renaming, because there are six quality scans of the same painting already available: Category:Saint Francis in the desert by Giovanni Bellini. There is no gain keeping also this one. Note that this is not a single case; the user has uploaded other badly misnamed works by the same date. Regards, Ggenellina (talk) 05:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerne le pont "romain"[edit]

Le pont présenté comme tel est en fait "le pont de la baou" dit aussi: "pont ROMAN". Des fouilles ont été effectué sur les vestiges du vrai pont romain en 2009. Celui-ci a été ensuite recouvert pour le protéger. Vous pouvez voir les photos des vestiges du pont romain à cette adresse. https://picasaweb.google.com/118301882054272160533/MiseAuJourDesVestigesDuPontRomain?authuser=0&feat=directlink

File:Bords_de_Garonne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PierreSelim (talk) 07:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Veronique, could this image, File:Jean Pierre Saltarelli.jpg, be intended as an attack on you (see author entry)? See also here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orangerie Sainte Geneviève.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulin Parc chico mendes 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animaux préhistoriques.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tigre sabre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 11:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renne et tigre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

27 rue Tardieu à Arles[edit]

Bonjour, fréquentant et connaissant Arles depuis longtemps, je peux vous affirmer que vous vous trompez, ces photos sont bien celles d'un immeuble sis 71 rue Augustin Tardieu et cette magnifique porte est le seul vestige du couvent Saint-Paul tenu par les sœurs du Refuge et servant à "accueillir", pour ne pas dire détenir, les "filles de mauvaise vie". Si vous en doutiez, lisez la page qui lui est consacrée dans Arles, le Guide, éditions du Patrimoine, ISBN 2-85822-643-1, en vente, notamment, à l'Office du Tourisme. Amitiés. Finoskov (talk) 07:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mamouth à Quinson.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Carniol[edit]

Bonjour, Il y a sur la page dédiée à Simiane la Rotonde une jolie photo de hameau titrée "hameau de Carniol". C'est une erreur, ce n'est pas Carniol (je sais, j'y habite), c'est une photo de Boulinette. Pouvez-vous corriger le titre ? Bien merci.

Smile congratulation`s for chilean wine el emperador[edit]

I see your photo of the chilean wine of Chile "el emperador" Smile visit "vino de chile" bye. pd, saludos desde sexta región Chile.

Copyright status: File:Charles Spindler.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Charles Spindler.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vitraux[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments.

Généralement, il n'y a rien à redire et tes photographies sont facilement validées. Cependant, j'ai un doute pour la validation de cette photographie : File:Rousset les Vignes - église 15.jpg. Saurais-tu qui est l'auteur de ce vitrail ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ps: actuellement, au niveau international, tu es la 45e contributrice en nombre d'image importées, félicitations !

Salut Marianne,

Je te fais entièrement confiance pour ce qui concerne les MH du Vaucluse. Du coup, j'ai creusé un peu le sujet et, selon l'IGN, la fiche Mérimée et le cadastre réunis, le MH « Gisement néolithique des Martins » semble plutôt se situer de l'autre côté du bourg de Roussillon (Vaucluse) aux coordonnées suivantes : 43° 54’ 3’’ N, 5° 16’ 10’’ E. Donc si tu as l'occasion de passer dans le coin, n'hésite pas à photographier ce qui doit ressembler à un vague champ…

Bises, Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Marianne Casamance,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Coffee Pots - Carlsbad?[edit]

Salut Marianne,

excusez-moi de parler en anglais, c'est plus plus simple pour moi.

Alors: you have uploaded some pics of some coffee pots last year. Some of them look like a "Carlsbad coffee pot", e.g. this one [2]. Right now I'm writing on the german wiki on the [coffee pot], but I don't got any pictures yet. So I want to ask you if you are familiar with that kind of coffee machine? I only got the link to a german manufacturer [3]. It would be very kind, if you could help.

I never used this one in the picture, but it's a "manual coffee maker", as th one used at the website in link. (sorry for my english ...). I may have this one too --Marianne Casamance (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merci bien! I think I'm gonna use these pictures in the wiki. Just another question: is the filter/strainer (la passoire) for the coffee included in the upper part or do you need a single-use paper? --JA SC (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abdel Kader.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGuf (d) 12:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nicolas Appert.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don Quichotte à Villebon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 01:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpentras - Hôtel Dieu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 06:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpentras - Hôtel Dieu 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cave de Bonnieux.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vergers Velleron - pommiers 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please add an English description and geo coordinates if possible. --Tuxyso 16:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Marianne Casamance 15:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Bonjour Marianne. Je vois que vous avez ajouté les coordineés géographiques à l'image File:Calocybe gambosa 080420wb.jpg que j'ai faite. Pouvez-vous me dire comment vous saviez l'endroit ? Strobilomyces (talk) 14:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toussaint Louverture Massy.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 09:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Barroux - Fontaine 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Barroux - blason sur Hotel Dieu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viviers - théatre municipal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI, --Arcalino 09:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inscriptions[edit]

Hello, merci pour ton message ! Malheureusement il n'existe aucun site recensant les inscriptions par lieu de conservation. Je suis justement en train de dépouiller ce type d'information à partir des ouvrages Carte archéologique de la Gaule, dont je possède deux des trois tomes pour le Vaucluse, notamment pour Vaison-la-Romaine et ses campagnes, Orange et la Vaucluse rhodanien, manque Le Luberon et pays d'Apt. J'ai fini pour Vaison et ses environs. Mais je n'ai pas encore compilé les informations. Peut-être vaut-il mieux attendre que je te livre les résultats par commune pour que tu puisses prendre tes dispos pour le chemin ? Peut-être d'ici ce soir. Nonopoly (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Je sais pour Entrechaux et Séguret. Devine de qui ça vient... Nonopoly (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, bien noté. La catégorie dans laquelle tu classes tes photos est la catégorie adéquate. Si toutefois les inscriptions concernent l'épigraphie latine antique, je m'en occuperai. Bravo pour tes photos et bonne continuation ! Nonopoly (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marianne, Je me permets de vous écrire car j'ai telechargé des images du Musée du Verre et du Vitrail http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:MyGallery&withJS=MediaWiki:JSONListUploads.js&gUser=Albane46

et j aimerai les mettre sur la page que vous avez crée hier mais je ne sais pas comment faire. Pouvez-vous m'aider ou me guider?

Je reste à votre entière disposition,

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Etape 6 Tour de France 2013.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 06:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. évidemment !!. N'hésite-pas à me prévenir chaque fois que tu verses de tels fichiers, je m'occuperai du reste. Bonne suite ! Nonopoly (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roussas et son château[edit]

Chère Marianne,

Depuis quelques temps, je me sens moins seule sur les pages Roussas ;-)

J'ai essayé de mettre le même bandeau que vous (inscrit dans la base Mérimée etc...), mais je ne sais pas comment faire, je n'y arrive pas, ça ne marche pas, alors qu'il me semble que je copie exactement ce qu'il y a chez vous. Pourriez-vous m'aider, s'il vous plaît?

Par ailleurs, j'ai vu que vous avez mis en rouge (page à créer) Château de Roussas (ancien). Pourquoi "ancien", y aurait-il déjà une page "Château de Roussas" ? J'ai constaté qu'il y a une page WP pour la Chapelle Saint-Germain. Le château de Roussas sera ouvert au public ce prochain mois de septembre à l'occasion des journées du patrimoine. Ce serait l'occasion d'aller y prendre quelques photos de l'intérieur. Personnellement, je ne pourrai pas y aller, et vous?

A bientôt et bon dimanche!

--BiiJii (talk) 08:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC) (aussi sur WP en tant que BeeJay)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avignon - Petit Palais 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 11:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 en France, 21 September 2013[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 Votre photo File:Paris_-_Gare_d'Orsay_2.JPG a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 21 September 2013. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Félicitations ! --Trizek from FR 16:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

En voulant te mettre deux mots ici, je constate que ton horloge est en compétition dans WLM. Elle me plaisait bien à un détail près. J'ai pris le temps de le modifier ce matin. N'hésite pas à éjecter mon fichier s'il ne te plaît pas ou s'il te pose problème à propos de WLM. Au cas où tout serait OK, inutile de me remercier : je trouve, moi aussi, assez souvent, des gens pour m'aider sur les différentes pages de Commons. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loges en Josas.JPG[edit]

Bonjour, votre photo :

ne semble pas correspondre à la Porte de Jouy mais au restaurant Relais de Courlande situé ici :

Object location48° 45′ 44.31″ N, 2° 08′ 06.54″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

Pourriez-vous vérifier s'il n'y a pas erreur ? Merci d'avance. Lionel Allorge (talk) 22:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Désolée pour le retard sur la réponse. Les orages d'hier, dans le Vaucluse ont fortement pertubé ma connxion internet personnelle. Concernant la porte de Jouy, le fait de voir un établissement type hôtel restaurant sur le site d'un MH n'est pas une première (de nombreux chateau transformer en relais étape de luxe !). J'avais effectivement pas mal tourner aux Loges en Josas, au point de me renseigner en mairie, avant de faire la photo. Ils m'ont bien confirmer que la porte de Jouy se trouve bien dans le parc du relais, au niveau du rond point, ce qui est le cas de ce bâtiment. Le batiment du restaurant, sur le même terrain, se trouve une centaine de mètres plus loin, en direction du centre du village. Il faut dire que je cherchais une "simple porte" type médiéval. Et là, on a plutot un octroy des plus confortable. Bref, avec les info en ma possession, je dirais du 80 % presque sure. Sauf contre ordre, que je pourrais aisément comprendre. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Marianne pour cette réponse détaillée. En me rendant sur place, dans le cadre du concours WLM, je suis arrivé à un endroit bien différent du vôtre, un bâtiment qui s'appelle la Maison forestière de la Porte de Jouy. Vous en trouverez les photos et la localisation ici : Category:Porte de Jouy. Du coup je ne sais pas quel est le bon bâtiment :-( et la description de la base Mérimée n'aide pas... Je vais mettre une note dans la page de discussion de la catégorie pour signaler le problème. Lionel Allorge (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Avignon - Jacquemard.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avignon - Jacquemard.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 00:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Détail Théatre d'Avignon.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Détail Théatre d'Avignon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Rémy - Prieuré de Saint-Paul-de-Mausole 74.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture but it should be cropped a little bit on the right. Pymouss 20:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC). ✓ Done done --Marianne Casamance 00:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 19:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Merci[edit]

I would like to thank you for the corrections when it comes to the two pictures from Luxembourg I've uploaded some time ago. I've been in quite a rush in recent days. I am a Czech person living in Belgium; and sometimes the names can be tricky (there is Place de Luxembourg in Brussels as well as the Luxembourg province in Belgium etc. ;-) I use Google maps for naming my files but as you can see, sometimes I fail. So - great job and I hope you'll help others who might be lost as well as I am. --Aktron (talk) 21:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marianne

il y a une erreur de légende. Cette maison n'est pas la maison dites de Diane de poitiers. celle-ci se trouve à l'angle de la rue st gaucher et de la rue Bouverie alors que la maison diane de poitier se trouve dans la rue qui fait face à la mairie. Voici sa photo.

A+ Matpib (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2013[edit]

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Gerne möchten wir uns hiermit für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments bedanken.

Die Award Show, in deren Rahmen die Gewinner bekanntgegeben und ausgezeichnet werden, wird am 30. November, von 11:00 - 16:00Uhr, in der Nationalbibliothek in Bern (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern) stattfinden. Verpasse nicht das spannende Rahmenprogramm: Führung durch das Eidgenössische Archiv für Denkmalpflege, Einführungs-Workshop und Schreibateliers sowie eine Foto-Ausstellung der ausgezeichneten Bilder - ergänzt mit Bildern aus dem Eidgenössischen Archiv für Denkmalpflege. Für die Award-Show kann man sich hier anmelden: Anmeldung Award Show.

Für weitere Infos kannst du ebenfalls unsere Website unter http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch konsultieren oder uns unter info@wikimedia.ch schreiben.

Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisations-Kommittee

WLM CH (Français)

Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH,

Le gagnants seront annoncés pendant la cérémonie de clôture qui aura lieu de 11h00 à 16h00 le samedi 30 novembre à la Bibliothèque Nationale (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern).

Cette cérémonie de remise des prix comprendra un repas de midi et un programme intéressant: une visite guidée des archives, des ateliers d'édition de Wikipédia, et une exposition des photos gagnantes accompagnées d'images des archives fédérales de monuments historiques. Vous pouvez vous inscrire à cet évènement en remplissant le formulaire Registration for Award Show.

Pour tout autre renseignement, veuillez consulter notre site web http://wikilovesmonuments.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch.

Avec nos salutations les meilleures, Le comité d'organisation

WLM CH (English)

Dear WikiLovesMonuments CH-participant,

We would like to thank you very much for your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

The award show, where the winning pictures will be announced, will take place on November 30, from 11:00 - 16:00 o'clock, in Bern in the National Library (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern).

This award show will be accompanied by a lunch and an interesting frame program: A guided tour through the archives, workshops/editing sessions and an exhibition of the winning pictures with additional pictures from the Federal Archives of Historical Monuments. You can register for this event if here: " Registration for Award Show.

For any further information you can check our website on http://wikilovesmonuments.ch or write us on info@wikimedia.ch.

With our best regards, The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Vogliamo ringraziarti molto per la partecipazione.

La cerimonia finale, in cui le foto vincitrici saranno annunciate, avrà luogo il 30 novembre dalle 11:00 alle 16:00 alla Biblioteca Nazionale di Berna (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern).

La premiazione sarà accompagnata da un pranzo e da un programma di contorno interessante: una visita guidata agli archivi, workshops e un'esposizione delle foto vincitrici con l'aggiunta delle foto provenienti dagli Archivi Federali dei Monumenti Storici. Ci si può registrare presso la pagina web: Registrazione per la cerimonia finale.

Per ogni altra informazione si prega di consultare il nostro sito http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch o di scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch.

Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Marianne Casamance,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

résidu de distillation de lavande[edit]

Bonjour

Je suis très étonné par la légende de File:Chaumes de lavande.JPG. Cela m’a tout l’air d’être de vulgaires bottes de paille (protégées par du plastique : on ne fait pas ça avec un résidu destiné à la décomposition). Vous êtes vous approchée pour respirer le parfum ?

En général, les résidus de distillation ressemblent plutôt à cela : File:Déchets de distillation de lavande à Valensole.JPG. K800i (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Marianne Casamance,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Do you really want to make a RFA? :O —레비Revi 11:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lot de petits suisses 1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2014…[edit]

Bonjour,

Les choses sont encore un peu floues, surtout au niveau de l'équipe internationale mais il la France participera très probablement à WLM 2014. Les besoins en aide ne sont pas au niveau de la préparation (les listes sur WP, les catégories sur WP ou COM, etc. sont déjà tout prêtes, il y a juste un peu de mise à jour à faire) mais plutôt le traitement pendant le concours et surtout après celui-ci.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 07:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Pour ma part, je sèche... j'ai demandé de l'aide... Nonopoly (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Grâce à l'aide d'Ursus : [4] Nonopoly (talk) 16:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Benoit XII.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Benoit XIII.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Clément V.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Clément VI.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Clément VII.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Grégoire XI.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Innocent VI.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jean XXII.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 07:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benoit XIII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benoit XII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clément VII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clément VI.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clément V.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grégoire XI.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean XXII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Innocent VI.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April photo challenge[edit]

Hi Marianne. FYI I have removed one of your entries from the photo challenge as it does not appear to be eligible (must be newly uploaded during April 2014). HelenOnline 08:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

photo de qualité![edit]

chère Marianne, je te laisse toute liberté pour changer mes intitulé de catégorie de photos!le système est pour moi ,un peu une usine à gaz!! pas de mauvaise volonté de ma part,juste a little perdu dans ce dédale,que d'aucun trouve simple.... un donateur amical,

photos a placer dans une catégorie![edit]

bonjour, je souhaite mettre qlq photos sur mon département pour l'illustrer;peux tu me dire dans quelle catégorie les mettre:" photographs of drôme" est ce correct? ou une autre a disposition? merci pour ton aide. cordialement

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Château du Martinet - façade nord.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

And also:

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux Morts au Plateau des poètes003.JPG : qu'en pense tu ?[edit]

Bonsoir

J'ai un doute sur ton analyse : le bâtiment concerné par la fiche Palissy que tu indiques ne décrit pas le monument de la photo que tu mets en lien. Donc, à priori, ce n'est pas le bon sculpteur ! :-)

Bonne soirée, Trizek from FR 20:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vérification des photos pour WLM[edit]

Bonjour

Pour info, ce diff : tu as bien placé le bâtiment en RFD, mais avec de mauvais paramètres, notamment en le rattachant à la page d'un autre bâtiment.

Par ailleurs, je m'étonne de te voir vérifier des photos en les retirant du « check », tout en étant participante au concours. J'y vois un petit conflit d'intérêt.

Merci d'avance pour ta réponse, Trizek from FR 14:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pour préciser le message de Trizek :
Les deux sont possibles à toi de choisir, et le second serait tout de même très utile (tu peux aussi ne rien vérifier du tout évidemment, aucune obligation Clin).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour ta réponse. Je m'excuse également pour l'âpreté de mon message.
Si tu te places en « out of competition » et souhaites t'investir dans la vérification, tu peux également accéder au pad secret où sont choisies les images du jour. ;-) Envoies moi un courriel si cela te tente !
Bonne soirée, Trizek from FR 19:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Peux-tu m'envoyer un mail ? Ainsi, les discussions restent secrètes ;-) Merci, Trizek from FR 19:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonne Mère ![edit]

Salut Marianne !

Tout d'abord, merci pour le boulot de vérification que tu fais pour WLM 2014 : ton aide est très précieuse. Même si on a un peu moins de photos cette année que l'an passé, ça demande quand même du temps de traiter tout ça.

J'ai juste une petite remarque à te faire après avoir vu ce diff. ND de la Garde à Marseille fait partie des monuments non historiques les plus célèbres de France, avec son alter ego le Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre. Dans ces cas-là, je retire du concours ces images et donc j'enlève le modèle Template:T et j'avertis le participant (si j'estime qu'il de bonnes chance de lire sa PU, comme c'est le cas ici).

N'hésite pas à vérifier sur les listes de WP, même si ça te semble évident qu'un monument est un MH. Honnêtement, à part ces deux-là, il n'y a pas de grosse surprise : la basilique de Fourvière est bien un MH, tout comme la « nouvelle » Major de Marseille, ainsi que la plupart de ces volumineuses églises de la fin du XIXTemplate:E.

Bonne soirée à toi,

Amitiés, Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monument national de la victoire de la Marne[edit]

Bonjour Marianne,

je te remercie pour l'attention que tu porte à mes photographies, je note bien que tu a retiré du concours les photographies du monument de Mondement pour violation du droit d'auteur et qu'elles sont proposées à la suppression. Mais dans ce cas pourqoui ne pas appliquer cette logique à l'ensemble des images de ce monument ? En effet il existe depuis plus d'une année des images telle que celle-ci : file:Mondement WWI memorial.JPG.

Sincèrement Garitan (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour je propose de bien vouloir vérifier toute la catégorie et de na pas faire seulement dans le détail. --Les Meloures ([[User talk:Les Meloures|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marianne Casamance,

je découvre que tu a proposé un certain nombre d'images à la suppression comme celle sité en titre, je ne sais pas quelle est la régle mais en général les autres contributeurs laissent un message sur la page de l'auteur de la photo. Cette demarche laissant la possibilité d'expliquer et de participer au débat, si il y en a, de justifier la presence de cette image ou d'abonder dans le sens de la suppression de cette image.

Sincérement Garitan ([[User talk:Garitan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour. En effet, étant novice, je n'ai pas précisé le lieux exact de la prise de vue de cette "partielle" adresse. C'est à ALBI que j'ai pris ce cliché, ayant constaté son absence sur WIKI. Je ne manquerais pas de mieux informer mes ajouts de photos. J'avoue avoir du mal à insérer mes contributions mais je suis pugnace... Merci beaucoup pour votre aide.

Sincèrement armol81--Armol81 ([[User talk:Armol81|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Solar_panels_France_by_region[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci pour ta catégorisation des panneaux solaires. J'ai changé la catégorie Category:Solar_panels_France_by_region en Category:Solar_panels_in_France_by_region qui me semble plus juste en anglais.

Librement,

Lionel Allorge ([[User talk:Lionel Allorge|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Fr.Latreille ([[User talk:Fr.Latreille|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hôtel d'Agar et de Perusis[edit]

Bonjour, Je suis le trésorier de l'association des amis de l'hôtel d'Agar de Cavaillon. Vous pouvez consulter notre site http://www.hotel-dagar.com/ Je vous remercie de votre contribution sur les monuments historiques de Cavaillon, mais vous avez confondu l'Hôtel d'Agar et celui de Perusis qui sont contigus. Pourriez vous modifier votre photo et la mettre sous le référence du bon monument? Bien cordialement. Cédric Périquiaud

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Guiggz ([[User talk:Guiggz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Guiggz ([[User talk:Guiggz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Guiggz ([[User talk:Guiggz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Cake7545 ([[User talk:Cake7545|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Cake7545 ([[User talk:Cake7545|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Cake7545 ([[User talk:Cake7545|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Cake7545 ([[User talk:Cake7545|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AutotranslateOdysseus1479 (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mont de Serre Chevalier[edit]

Bonjour, je ne comprends pas la raison d'être de la catégorie "Mont de Serre Chevalier". Cette dénomination n'a aucune existence dans la réalité ni sur une carte. La catégorie regroupe des fichiers qui montrent certes les environs du col du Lautaret mais aussi les environs de Montgenèvre à 30km de là. De plus la RNN des pics du Combeynot se limite au versant nord du massif du Combeynot et n'est pas visible sur toutes les photos. Cordialement. Pmau ([[User talk:Pmau|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MM[edit]

bonjour, vous avez une belle collection de monuments aux morts, voulez vous nous rejoindre à : http://www.panoramio.com/group/43204

Merci et belle journée !

jeanfrancois.python@neuf.fr

categories pluriel[edit]

Bonjour, Marianne, attention de faire les categories en pluriel, donc Foyers ruraux, pas foyer rural. Mais je me demande aussi: il faut faire les categories en anglais et peut-être que toute la série des categories Foyer rural est à supprimer.--Havang(nl) ([[User talk:Havang(nl)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Le Passant ([[User talk:Le Passant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Having done personally, photos, live, when he was signing his book me at a public signing, in agreement with Edouard Loubet, I'm copyright owner of my own photos. So I allow myself therefore to put my own pictures on commons. I see no problem with the use of his photos. Marianne Casamance ([[User talk:Marianne Casamance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Edouard Loubet (restaurateur).jpg isn't your own work? --Steinsplitter ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Edouard Loubet (restaurateur).jpg is a screenshot of TV, so it was deleted, the other photos are fine. Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
actually, I have not made the picture the same day, at some point we had no picture of this chef. the others were made live one day autograph books. You have 2 differents situations. Marianne Casamance ([[User talk:Marianne Casamance#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Berlingot[edit]

Hello, il y a deux problèmes sur cette image. Tout d'abord tu l'as téléversée mais tu n'es pas l'auteur. Il faudrait donc envoyer une permission à OTRS. Par ailleurs, il me semblerait préférable de flouter la photo de l'emballage sur laquelle il peut y voir des droits d'auteur. Cordialement, — Racconish 📥 11:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Le nom qui est affiché dans le champ "Auteur" est l'ancien nom d'utilisateur de User:Marianne Casamance. Puis à mon avis l'emballage étant déjà très flou, je ne pense pas qu'il soit nécessaire de flouter. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merci. Je ne savais pas. Cordialement, — Racconish 📥 12:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai effectivement changer de pseudo entre la mise en ligne et aujourd'hui. La modification a eu lieu sur mes téléchargement, mais pas sur mes "anciens" noms d'auteurs. Marianne Casamance ([[User talk:Marianne Casamance#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos d'Avignon en Ligne[edit]

J'ai rajouté mes photos dans Category:Fabrica - édit-à-thons Festival
Esby ([[User talk:Esby|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Template:AutotranslateRama ([[User talk:Rama|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RFD pour ND Notre-Dame-de-la-Trinité.JPG[edit]

Bonjour,

Je vois que tu as mis File:ND Notre-Dame-de-la-Trinité.JPG dans la catégorie RFD mais je ne trouve pas la demande de suppression correspondante.

J'allais créer la RFD moi-même quand j'ai cherché le nom des architectes et que je suis tombé sur cette fiche qui est tout sauf claire. L'architecte originel Charles-Henri Besnard est mort 1946 (donc DP en 2017) mais l'architecte principal, Paul Rouvière, est mort en 1939 (dont DP depuis 2010, à moins qu'il ne soit mort pour la France...). Bref, ce n'est pas clair.

Cdlt, VIGNERON ([[User talk:VIGNERON|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour VIGNERON,
J'ai créer la catégorie, mais je n'ai pas été plus loin (pas de demande faite, pour le moment). j'étais en fait dans le même doute que toi, pour les mêmes raisons : mise dans la catégorie pour Charles-Henri Besnard, mais rien pour les autres. à priori, la photo ne pourra tout de même pas être charge sur commons avant 2017 (voir même 2054, pour Yves-Marie Froidevaux décédé en 1983).
Bonne journée Marianne Casamance ([[User talk:Marianne Casamance#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
J'hésite fortement à faire la demande. Si je comprends bien la fiche, l'article WP et différentes sources, la partie que l'on voit sur la photo (extérieurs du clocher et de la nef) est uniquement l’œuvre de Paul Rouvière ; j'aurais plutôt à laisser cette photo mais j'ai un doute. Je propose de laisser un message sur Commons talk:Projet Monuments Historiques français pour avoir d'autres avis. Cdlt, VIGNERON ([[User talk:VIGNERON|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, d'autres avis seraient les biens venus. Marianne Casamance ([[User talk:Marianne Casamance#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

église de Mirmande[edit]

bonjour, merci d'avoir apporté votre correction sur Eglise de Marsanne,j'avais confondu Marsanne et Mirmande. amicalement a vous

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, Template:ISODate[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Sarragachies - Vignes MH parcelle 2.JPG » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du Template:ISODate. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Trizek from FR 08:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Autotranslate Stefan4 ([[User talk:Stefan4|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 86.217.75.46 21:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Robert Weemeyer ([[User talk:Robert Weemeyer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Template:Autotranslate — Racconish ☎ 17:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borne milliaire d'Antonin-le-Pieux à Manduel[edit]

Hello ! Merci pour ton message. Après vérification sur http://db.edcs.eu/epigr/epi_einzel.php?s_sprache=en&p_belegstelle=CIL+12 , il semblerait que ce soit CIL XII 5603 ou 5604. Est-ce que tu pourrais prendre un gros plan des inscriptions pour qu'on puisse les classer ? merci à toi ! Nonopoly ([[User talk:Nonopoly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marianne! You're welcome to join the Commons WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 ([[User talk:NaBUru38|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Ancalagon ([[User talk:Ancalagon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marianne, désolé, je crois en ta bonne foi, mais la licence et l'attribution de la photo ne sont pas correctes puisque tu n'es pas l'auteur de la photo. Ancalagon ([[User talk:Ancalagon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide location information for this image? Ideally we would like to know the coordinates (longitude and latitude) from which you took it. If you can find the location on Google Maps, you can right-click on the map page and then left-click on "What's here?" and Google will tell you the exact coordinates of the position. Once you have this information, you can place it in the Template:Tl template which I have already added to the image. Thank you! KDS4444 ([[User talk:KDS4444|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salut ! Merci beaucoup, mais il semblerait que la stèle provienne de Dax, pas d'Hasparren... Je me suis occupé de la catégoriser :) Merci beaucoup. A bientôt. Nonopoly ([[User talk:Nonopoly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 en France, Template:ISODate[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Bonpas allée caladée.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du Template:ISODate.

Cordialement, VIGNERON ([[User talk:VIGNERON|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

retrait de photos du concours wiki loves...[edit]

Je crois comprendre que vous avez retiré mes photos du concours parceque mon adressa mail était erronée. Maintenant que j'ai réparé cette erreur, vous serait-il possible de ré-intégrer mes photos dans le concours. Cordialement. celeda

Deletions nominations[edit]

Hi, please use the 'Nominate for deletion' link from the left menu if you want to nominate a file for deletion, so that all necessary steps are taken. Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate LX (talk, contribs) 20:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see https://blog.tookapic.com/tookapic-license-simply-explained, which explicitly says: "Keep in mind they're not licensed under CC0" and "What I CAN’T do with those photos? ... Redistribute digitally on their own. For example put the photos as available for download / purchase on your own website." That's incompatible with Commons:Licensing and prohibits what we do here – making individual files available for download. LX (talk, contribs) 20:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate LX (talk, contribs) 20:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As above, not CC0. That seems to have been made up by the intermediate source site when aggregating content. LX (talk, contribs) 20:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]