User talk:Ural-66

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ural-66!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мука из плодов черёмухи обыкновенной (Flour of Prunus padus)..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • И как из такого фото будет видно, что это именно мука, а не порошок коричневого цвета? Тем более, что не кустарного, а промышленного способа производства?Ural-66 (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Картриджи с разными герметиками и пистолет для них.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Так всё таки, как внешне, без фото картриджа отличить их содержимое по фото? А именно: силиконового и акрилового герметика? Физико-химические свойства и органолептические свойства у них разные как до полимеризации, так и после. На фото - этого не видно, оба белые, желеобразной консистенции. Но по вашему - фото картриджа охраняется авторским правом? (фотографировал сам) Ural-66 (talk) 03:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • But what about the following provisions? Before you delete yourself even read it Commons:Derivative works? No artistic contribution from the same type produced by hundreds of manufacturers around the world of serial products there. Photos were taken with this myself, and what was indicated. And so removed, but did not explain why.

"So, you say that if I take a picture of a child who is a lucky possessor of a plush Winnie the Pooh, will the copyright for this photograph be owned by the Disney studio, since they own the rights to Pooh's design?"

"Is it true that everyone owns a copyright for every thing? And what about cars? Or kitchen chairs? The casing of my computer?" Ural-66 (talk) 11:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Водительское удостоверение РФ (образца 2014 года). Стороны А и Б..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Акриловые проникающие грунтовки.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Так всё таки, как внешне, без фото упаковки понять что на фото? Что это не просто белая жидкость, к примеру, известковое молоко?. Но по вашему - фото канистры охраняется авторским правом? (фотографировал сам) Ural-66 (talk) 03:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • But what about the following provisions? Before you delete yourself even read it Commons:Derivative works? No artistic contribution from the same type produced by hundreds of manufacturers around the world of serial products there. Photos were taken with this myself, and what was indicated. And so removed, but did not explain why.

"So, you say that if I take a picture of a child who is a lucky possessor of a plush Winnie the Pooh, will the copyright for this photograph be owned by the Disney studio, since they own the rights to Pooh's design?"

"Is it true that everyone owns a copyright for every thing? And what about cars? Or kitchen chairs? The casing of my computer?" Ural-66 (talk) 11:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of the 70th Anniversary Victory Day celebrations in Russia 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Могила Сумина Петра Ивановича (губернатор) f001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Земляника лесная (Fragaria vesca) f005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nefronus (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Земляника лесная (Fragaria vesca) f013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nefronus (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Земляника лесная (Fragaria vesca) f011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nefronus (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Челябинская областная клиническая больница № 1 f001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not own work, just a derivative
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 10:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Ural-66, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Вагон для перевозки листового металлопроката f012.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 10:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sealle по русский и поподробнее если причину удаления пожалуйста. Особенно по памятнику архитектуры, сделанному в рамках викигида. 37.113.164.126 21:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Для начала потрудитесь залогиниться, здесь Ваши игры с умышленным редактированием из-под IP долго терпеть никто не будет. Затем попытайтесь писать по-русски без ляпсусов, чтобы можно было понять генерируемый Вами текст. После этого постарайтесь осилить содержание правила COM:Производные произведения - для владеющих русским языком там всё описано предельно подробно. Sealle (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Для начала потрудитесь залогиниться, здесь Ваши ... редактированием из-под IP" - вообще то, если не заметили, везде на всех залитых мной фото залогиненный, мало того, если вы не знали, под IP фото не залить ни в википедии, ни на викискладе. "с умышленным редактированием из-под IP ... никто не будет" - очень серьёзное обвинение, могу адресовать вас на ВП:НО. "попытайтесь писать по-русски без ляпсусов" - какой именно ляпсус на русском языке был в удалённых вами фотографиях и почему вы их не исправили или не сообщили мне о них? "COM:Производные произведения" - я не могу помнить что было в удалённых фотографиях, вы не напомнили что именно и что нарушило это "что именно". Может винни-пух попал в кадр исторического здания XVIII-XIX века? Если так, то вам надобно бы самим перечитать "Производные...". Что в итоге, складывается ощущение, что вы увлекаетесь в ущерб ВП:НПУ, начиная с той истории с Карподакусом: Обсуждение участника:Ural-66/Архив/1#Половой акт. Может надобно быть менее злопамятным? Ural-66 (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ну и по вагону вопрос - из десятков (если не сотен) вагонов мной залитых этот чем что нарушил? То же по ЧОКБ - из нескольких десятков больниц именно фото этой больницы, при чём только одно из них? Поймите, я спрашиваю не в укор вам, а чтобы не допустить впредь подобных ошибочных заливок, только для этого ответ от вас ожидаю обоснованный и конкретный, а не размытые рассуждения о трёх инопланетянах. Ural-66 (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Проблемы с пониманием, очевидно, никуда не делись. 1) На каком языке написано "по русский"? 2) В удалённых файлах не больницы и вагоны, а фото логотипов, плакатов, схем, мозаик и тому подобных авторских работ. Фотографирование чужих произведений не делает Вас их автором и не позволяет распространять их под свободной лицензией. Sealle (talk) 01:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Конкретней можно? Из нескольких тысяч залитых изображений, полагаете я помню в котором что конкретно? По вагону может вы логотип ЧТПЗ посчитали? Так, вот данный логотип на том вагоне - владельца вагона, если вы не знали ЧТПЗ вагоны не производит. А использует только для транспортировки своей продукции. Мало того, этот его логотип, но уже не на вагоне, а в чистом виде есть в статье в википедии: [1]. Что касаемо мозаики - я вам уже сообщал, что заливка в рамках викигида и памятников была - вот сюда гляньте [2], если проекту не помогали и не в курсе. там 3 страницы-вкладки, а всего их тысячи в рамках проекта. Что касаемо русскости, на мою страницу в википедии посмотрите, там юзербоксы не просто набраны, а написано ещё в названии раздела кое-что, и есть юзербокс про "ошипки" в том числе. По больнице - как вы предлагаете сфотографировать здание, если его логотип на фасаде этого здания? Ural-66 (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Логотип в Википедии, как и положено, оформлен как несвободное изображение. На Commons же несвободные файлы запрещены. По остальному — к сожалению, не располагаю временем, чтобы по 3-4 раза повторять одно и то же. Пользуйтесь форумом по авторскому праву. Sealle (talk) 10:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Памятник Герою СССР Н. И. Кузнецову (Челябинск) f004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос[edit]

Нахрена хозяин-дебил собрал зелёные плоды земляники,он долбаёб,скажите ему. 188.66.34.34 21:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 02:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 03:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 03:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Monument_«Skaz_ob_Urale» has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:402:9F00:7037:1C61 11:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]