User talk:Tsemii

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Image deletion warning Image:Amphetamine structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--C.Löser 14:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vexi Salmi.jpg, which was nominated by Samulili at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vexi Salmi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timo Kalli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments horrible teeth, but the quality is okay --Carschten 16:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ellen Jokikunnas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Bo Carpelan[edit]

Hello Teemu, I have nominated Your image File:Bo Carpelan.jpg as a VI. Could You geocode the image? Thanks in advance, --Gumruch (talk) 08:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Tsemii (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Antti Rinne.jpg valokuvaa käytetään vaalimainoksissa[edit]

File:Antti Rinne.jpg huomasin että tuota ottamaasi valokuvaa on käytetty mahdollisesti luvatta Antti Rinteen vaalimainoksissa sanomalehdissä, ainakaan ei ollut attribuointia kuvan yhteydessä. --Zunter (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kiitos tiedosta! Luulisi demareilla olevan puheenjohtajastaan kuvia omastakin takaa. Missä lehdissä mainoksia on näkynyt? Kerran oli Hesarin muistokirjoituksessa ottamani kuva ilman tietoa kuvaajasta. Vaadin nimen mainitsemista oikaisussa ja lopulta sen sain. Kun nyt on kyse vaalimainoksesta, en taida jaksaa närkästyä samalla lailla kuvani sosialisoinnista. Tai ehkä kannattaisi valittaa, jos vaikka Antti Rinne toisi korvaukseksi suklaarasian. --Tsemii (talk) 23:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mainosaviisi on kyseinen lehti (18.3.2015 lehti) ja etusivulla vasemmalla on mainos. Aikaisemminkin oon eri lehdistä bongannut Commonssin käyttäjien ottamia kuvia, ilman että tekijää mainitaan. --Zunter (talk) 07:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tuossa suora linkki http://www.lakeudenaviisi.com/images/lehti.pdf kyseiseen lehden nuomeroon (linkki vanhenee kun uusi numero tulee). Joko olet selvittänyt sotkun? --Zunter (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kiitos linkistä. Kävin kuvan aikoinaan katsomassa ja arvioin rikkeen anteeksiannettavaksi, etenkin kun SDP hävisi vaalit. Törkeämpi tapaus oli se, kun Ylioppilaslehti värjäsi kuvaamani vihreän poliitikon siniseksi ilman minun nimeäni. --Tsemii (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hymy-lehti käyttää ottamaasi valokuvaa[edit]

Selvittelen suomenkielisen Wikipedian puolella tapausta jossa Hymy -lehti käyttää aineistoa Wikimedia Commonssista lisenssienvastaisesti, niin huomasin että myös sinun ottamaasi valokuvaa File:Kata Kärkkäinen 2008.jpg käytetään heidän uutisessaan luvatta. --Zunter (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kiitos ilmoituksesta! Vähän hymyilyttää, että ovat halunneet käyttää ikivanhaa, kaiken lisäksi erinimisen ihmisen kuvaa. Toki kuvaajan nimi pitäisi mainita. --Tsemii (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Amphetamine structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wostr (talk) 16:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:H2O (water molecule) thumb2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 10:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]