User talk:Tournasol7/Archive8

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mail Droulin in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Pecherie in Saint-Aignan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bark of Acer pseudoplatanus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Slightly too bright but o.k. --Ermell 07:00, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church of Beaulieu-les-Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room of Diane in the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14 rue des Papegauds in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western tower of the Castle of Valencay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Tayac in Uzerche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; the tower is tilted a bis, whereas the flagpole is exactly vertical. So I suppose that the tower is also tilted in reality --Llez 15:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stained-glass window of the Saint Louis Cathedral of Blois 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stained-glass window of the Saint Louis Cathedral of Blois 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keep of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Philippe de Bethune in Selles-sur-Cher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Rouget de Lisle in Saint-Aignan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park of the Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Francois I wing of the castle of Blois 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The post-processing is not well done. It's very visible that the sky has been altered all around the tree but not inside, where the color is clearer. Please improve the post-treatment --Basile Morin 07:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 12:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)  Comment Better. Perspective and white balance improved. Though in my view the small areas of sky visible through the branches inside the tree are still clearer than the sky outside, and I don't think this is natural. Then I'm neutral now and if someone else want to promote this image, feel free to do so -- Basile Morin 00:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)  Support: all in all good quality. --Sj 16:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pont du Parayre 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont du Parayre 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-west exposure of the Chambord Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue Pierre-Chalaud in Uzerche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass window in the St Peter and St Paul church of Autoire 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality as! --Podzemnik 07:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass window of Notre-Dame collegiate church of Villefranche-de-Rouergue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont du Parayre 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, maybe a bit more contrast would be good --Podzemnik 07:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 17.jpg

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jvillafruela (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM 2018 : Vitraux de l'abbaye de Conques

Bonsoir Krzysztof,

Merci pour ta participation renouvelée à wiki loves monuments, toutefois dans ta série sur l'abbaye de Conques tu as pris deux photos des vitraux dont je vais devoir malheureusement demander la suppression car ce sont l’œuvre de Soulages.

Cordialement, Jvillafruela (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Par hasard, aurais-tu un cadrage plus large que tu pourrais ré-importé sur ces photos ? Là cela me semble limite et un peu trop rapproché pour invoqué le de minimis (surtout la photo 18).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

VIGNERON, pour la photo 17 je pense que le cadrage est assez large. Pour la photo 18: est-ce que je peux essayer de "cacher" le vitrail? Cdlt, Tournasol7 (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

L'idée est intéressante. Après, ce sont tes photos, je te laisse voir ce que tu souhaites faire. Cela dépendra aussi des avis en Deletion requests. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

VIGNERON, merci pour ton avis. Bonne apres-midi! Tournasol7 (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 18.jpg

File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jvillafruela (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Earl Mountains NZ 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The sign at the right is a little bit disturbing, but I wouldn't remove it. --XRay 07:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai Beach 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Valzergues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canterbury Museum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Pierre Augereau at the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla in the park of the Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Rode in Domme 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey Church Saint Pierre and Saint Paul of Beaulieu-les-Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please check the WB (looks very cold) --Uoaei1 08:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormer windows of the Castle of Valencay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montresor 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Aignan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Saint Anthony in Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla in the park of the Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 06.jpg

File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 13:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Pour info la demande est caduque, je l'ai remplacé par une demande globale sur le bâtiment (voir ci-dessous). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 02.jpg
• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 03.jpg
• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 04.jpg
• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 05.jpg
• File:Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes 06.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Rochefort in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments unusual crop, but nice image and good quality --Carschten 08:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church of Cheverny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 14.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 15.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 16.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 17.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 18.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 19.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 20.jpg

File:Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre André ^(talk) 17:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Belot in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room of Cesar de Vendome in the Castle of Chenonceau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Playing with colours and saturation, good job --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 Rue de la Foulerie in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good work --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Aignan 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West tower of the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side is hanging down. I think it should be horizontal. --Ermell 06:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 20:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Preche in Montrichard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Penissart in Saint-Aignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Pavee in Villeneuve 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey Church Saint Pierre and Saint Paul of Beaulieu-les-Loches 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good quality, but the white balance is too bluish/greenish and the image has little contrast. --Carschten 08:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 07:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)  Support so much better: QI now --Carschten 18:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 20.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 Rue de la Foulerie in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 07:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Pilori 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 07:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Justice in Uzerche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 07:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church of Chenonceaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 07:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Couffy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 07:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey Church Saint Pierre and Saint Paul of Beaulieu-les-Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The spot (bird) in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 07:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 23:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 21.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 24 rue de la Pecherie in Saint-Aignan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Pavee in Villeneuve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge of Jacques-Gabriel in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Valzergues 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 Place de la Rode in Domme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 10:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling in the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 10:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wainui Bay 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Pomies 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Notre Dame d'Aynes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Leodegar Church of Bouzies 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Place du Presbytere in Sainte-Enimie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade Peak in Fiordland National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you make it a little bit darker? --TheRunnerUp 15:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, better? Tournasol7 18:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)  Support For me its ok now --TheRunnerUp 07:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Philippe Auguste in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cher river in Montrichard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Villebresme in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:05, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 07:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Constant Ragot in Saint-Aignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe it would be even better with less foreground (4:3). --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame la Blanche church of Selles-sur-Cher 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiate Saint Ours of Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue Pierre-Chalaud in Uzerche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Consular House in Saint-Cere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Severac 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. What is the little gray dot above the left side of the castle? -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 17:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de la Monnaie in Figeac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, even though I'd be nicer to have horizontal lines straight --Podzemnik 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nazaire Basilica of Carcassonne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onapua Bay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 08:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemetery door in Canac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red grape 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman Bridge over Dourdou River in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 rue Constant-Ragot in Saint-Aignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Loches 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A large white area in the top right (probably after a perspective correction). Other things seem to be OK. Dmitry Ivanov 09:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC). Dmitry Ivanov,  Done. Tournasol7 15:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:37, 19 September 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the Cher river from the Castle of Chenonceau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamron AF 18-270mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great! --Podzemnik 08:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflowers cultivated in Southern France 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church of Montauban 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Quiteria church of Tarascon-sur-Ariege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire River in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indre river in Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Justice in Uzerche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church of Chenonceaux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire River in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vincent church of Carcassonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White grapes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame des Anges church of Collioure 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Bruejouls 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It could be sharper, but still ok --Poco a poco 07:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Duzou River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Auberoques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Aurillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 09:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Campagnac Aveyron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Hawea 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The light a bit dull but nice otherwise. I've been there! --Podzemnik 08:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge over Lot River in Estaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the Museum Victor-Brun in Montauban.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Cook from Kea Point 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 rue Constant-Ragot in Saint-Aignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Centaure in Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South-eastern facade of the prison in Aurillac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fox Glacier in Westland National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maruia Falls 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eastern exposure of the Courthouse in Aurillac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The central building represents only one-third of the facade listed at the MH, this image is better for the scope Aurillac - Palais de Justice 20130802-02.JPG --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Archaeodontosaurus, I'm not agree. The central building represents the courthouse, at the left is a prison and at the right is a gendarmerie. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope, and per above explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the Consular House of Aurillac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Rue in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room of Gabrielle d'Estrees in the Castle of Chenonceau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I do not get sense of trash can in composition, it´s not a heavy bin, more for leaves. No need for PS, easily to transport it out from view- Btw. where is my File:"Obere Bahnhohstraße 19 (Cadolzburg) HaJN 5938 HP.jpg"--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:56, 26 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Still a QI despite misc item left in front of heritage site. The heart is a pleasant touch too. Feel free to discuss. --Trougnouf 17:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Market hall of Domme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Henri Parayre in Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18 Rue Amaury de Severac in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Arsene Vermenouze in Aurillac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial Church in Gabriac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium robertianum in Estaing 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen Cathedral of Cahors 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Sky a little bit noisy.) --XRay 07:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South facade of the Wurzburg Residence 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice. With hot air balloon. :-) --XRay 07:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Cathedral Square in Christchurch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-west facade of the Castle of Chambord 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiate Saint Ours of Loches 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia peregrina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 12:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Pukaki 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO the resolution could be better. --XRay 13:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lot River in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Laval de Peyrusse-le-Roc 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte del Bos in Domme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montresor 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not 100% sure about the tilt, but ok --Poco a poco 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church of Cheverny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof of the Chambord Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Aignan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Puits Chatel in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 20:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Our Lady of Pity PlR 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gets very slightly unsharp in lower left, but to decline it over that, when so much else is in such great detail, would be a crime. --Daniel Case 01:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montresor 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof of the Chambord Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! State Highway 6 in Hope River Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy in sky, but good quality --Michielverbeek 07:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai Beach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Villebresme in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cher river in Montrichard 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway station in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire River in Blois 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Estaing 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont in Montrichard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Takapou Bay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northern frontage of the Market Square in Swiecie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulin de Sanhes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indre river in Loches 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:39, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Sardini in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue nationale in Montrichard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Justice in Uzerche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indre river in Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetland near Okarito 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --MB-one 07:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sale Street in Hokitika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Otematata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coprosma lucida in Auckland Botanic Gardens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpine tarn on Lewis Pass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Fox River Westland 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Belves 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Swiecie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe too flat, but OK for QI. --C messier 16:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Information board at Lewis Pass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South facade of the Wurzburg Residence 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Valzergues 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Sir Edmund Hillary' 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Lavalliere in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be there are CAs at the person at the left. --XRay 10:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montrichard Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Pilori 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Couffy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for me Good quality --Armenak Margarian 10:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kea Point Track in Mount Cook National Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Galgan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 09:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise Church of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 12:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin Church of Mayres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue Pierre-de-Blois in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 67 rue nationale in Montrichard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal appartments in Loches 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bank Street in Dunedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 06:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Galgan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rigth bank of Lot River in Cahors 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Julien-de-Malmont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corner of Rue de la Chapellenie and Rue Marguerite Mazet in Domme 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Les Vignes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 46 Rue Denis Papin in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you could crop out most of the street at bottom, and some of the sky up top --Daniel Case 17:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 19:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)  Support OK now --Daniel Case 01:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farm in the Castle of Chenonceau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could probably not be so saturated (and I don't usually mind that) --Daniel Case 17:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 19:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)  Support OK, although I wish the WB weren't so cool --Daniel Case 01:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Saint-Rome-de-Dolan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings in Saint-Projet in Cassaniouze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bowen Falls in Fiordland National Park 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Grand-Vabre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small halo to antenna. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 05:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Saint-Chely-du-Tarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church of Cheverny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really it's not good? Tournasol7 05:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC) It looks a bit deformed; the rainpipes are not vertical enough (see not); the more left the more visible this perspective problem. --Michielverbeek 06:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Hmm... I don't know; all others verticals are ok. Maybe it was natural... Tournasol7 18:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)  Support The resolution is rather high, and the sharpness is very good. I'm not fussy about the lines of old buildings. It reaches QI-level in my eyes. --Milseburg 13:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wurzburg Residence 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northern frontage at Place de la Halle in Domme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Denis Papin in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Paix in Saint-Aignan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Couffy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park of the Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Barnabas Church in Sebazac-Concoures 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Roch Church in La Vinzelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but maybe a bit oversharpened. IMO it is also a bit too blue --Michielverbeek 06:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire River in Blois 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any comments? Tournasol7 05:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC) I guess something went wrong with white balance. It looks like the image has got too much green and blue elemnents --Michielverbeek 06:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 19:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC) It is looking better --Michielverbeek 06:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Concoures 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Saint Roch of Roucan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des Tours in Domme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sky Tower from Mayoral Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Belot in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montresor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tower appears to be slightly askew. But nice picture for me.--Famberhorst 06:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)