User talk:Tournasol7/Archive5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Union Street in Dunedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Brengues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Church of Cajarc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Monesties 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cenevieres 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's a bit overexposed, but quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of Nativity of Faycelles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Place de l'Olmet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Austremoine Church of Issoire 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Denys Puech 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church of La Malene 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central courtyard of the Palais de la Berbie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* support.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of the castle Beaucaire in Nauviale 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Romain Church in Saint-Rome-de-Dolan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manor Place in Dunedin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Vieillevie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de Vors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Orsonnette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 21:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Patrick Cathedral in Auckland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corner of Rue Centrale and Rue du Château in Larnagol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40 Worcester Blvd in Christchurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but hard on the limit /brightness --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue de François Cabrol 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortune Theatre in Dunedin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterfall in Muret-le-Chateau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de La Guioule-sous-Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence Church of Cruejouls 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Worcester Street in Christchurch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Jesuit college and its chapel in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 14 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kniphofia northiae 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Pitie de Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenue de la Murette in Marcillac-Vallon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church in Muret-le-Chateau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mueller Lake from Kea Point 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Saint-Martin-de-Lenne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Moroder 11:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in Marcilhac-sur-Cele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Chairs bottom right a little bit disturbing. --XRay 05:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Barnabas Church in Sebazac-Concoures 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Belves 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. I'd maybe denoise the sky a little (uppert part mostly) but it's a QI regardless --Trougnouf 00:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment Jacek Halicki I didn't see your comment, is it a discuss then? --Trougnouf 00:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, it's better? Tournasol7 00:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue Lake in Mount Cook National Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Alte Mainbrucke in Wurzburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Right bank of Lot River in Cahors 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Route de Lunel in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christchurch Tram at Worcester Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Jumeaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camellia japonica 'In the Pink' in Dunedin Botanic Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Carlos yo 01:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Marqueyssac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Indeed --Poco a poco 07:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake and Tasman Glacier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manor Place in Dunedin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wurzburg Residence 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint Faith Abbey of Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Traverse in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of La Malene 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de la Barbacane in Peyrusse-le-Roc 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good now. QI for sure. --Halavar 17:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloe plicatilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antonin Church of Nauviale 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of the duke Decazes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of the castle of Nonette 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Footstool 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 Place de la Caze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. @Tournasol7: But: It's a promotion in advance. Please have a look to the photograph. It looks like tilted CW. --XRay 05:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 20:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malte Brun Range 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Qood quality and nice--Lmbuga 00:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church of La Malene 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House of Henri Martin 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Terrier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Pukaki 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 1 place du Vigan in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No, IMO but  Support Qi for me--Lmbuga 10:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Road in Twizel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue at Place de Griffoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central courtyard of the Palais de la Berbie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Acolyte NZ 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau des Ondes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Place Saint-Laurent in Orsonnette 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Fijaguet, southwest exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 69 rue Rinaldi in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucanthemum vulgare 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:26, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Amans Church of Cadayrac, northern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Sainte-Austremoine, southesat exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aroarokaehe Range 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Salles-la-Source 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Roquelaure 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outbuildings near the Castle Caylaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch Chapel of Noailhac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee des Arts et Metiers Traditionnels 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 06:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain near Church of Our Lady of the Assumption of Les Pradeaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but crop could be better at the left - with more space. --XRay 06:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kea Point Track in Mount Cook National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Leodegar Church of Bouzies 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Marienberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Calmontie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee des Arts et Metiers Traditionnels 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Geraud Church of Auzat-la-Combelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top left not optimal, but overall ok --Uoaei1 06:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Hopital.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahuriri River 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Monesties 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Conques 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bertholene 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 01:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Jean Baptiste Church of Noailhac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tasman Lake panorama (03-05-06-07).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tasman Lake panorama (03-05-06-07).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! This one is for you. --cart-Talk 09:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you @W.carter: . In Lightroom I can make panoramics also. This is my first :) Tournasol7 (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de Via in Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Church of Beduer 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wakatipu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Salvagnac-Cajarc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise Church of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. People in the background a little bit disturbing. --XRay 06:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chionochloa rubra in Burwood Bush Scientific Reserve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice perspective IMO and good quality--Lmbuga 00:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Salvy Church of Blaye 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rigth bank of Lot River in Cahors 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence churches of Vieillevie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Bruejouls 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! York Place in Dunedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Te Anau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant La Cascade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 16 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bordes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic of Capdenac-Gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint Faith Abbey of Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Mrs. Herbert Stevens'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place de l'Eglise in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Fort in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Benmore NZ 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windows of the west facade of the Wurzburg Residence 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yarmouth Street in Balclutha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bordes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment White blank space in the top left corner (see the note). --Halavar 00:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 14:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for sure. --Halavar 17:31, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Da Cunha Jean-Michel in Rallye de Marcillac 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:31, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Abbey of Marcilhac-sur-Cele 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The upper part of the photo could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 89-53 Place Jean Jacques Chapou in Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramic of Salles-la-Source, western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malte Brun Range 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Milandes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirikirikatata Range 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordogne River 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lot River in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Rue in Domme 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hilights might have been suppressed a little too vigorously, but this is still a nicely framed photo of a French street --Daniel Case 04:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kea Point Track in Mount Cook National Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House of Henri Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 8 rue de la Grand'Côte in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hilary Church of Pruines, eastern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bowen Falls in Fiordland National Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux pont d'Albi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of the family Curieres 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Decazeville 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Side of the Mount Belle 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Valady 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bertholene 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortune Theatre in Dunedin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de La Guioule-sous-Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison du Bastidou 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wide angel shot with depth to it. Love it. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hollyford River NZ 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former palace of justice in Espalion 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Laval de Peyrusse-le-Roc 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 08:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SIAEP de la Roucarie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residue after the roman bridge pillar SEdO 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Rue de la Fourdonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio serpens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Monesties.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former mine La Découverte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just a window, but it's well-detailed --Daniel Case 19:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Marienberg in Wurzburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Hawea 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. You should add the panorama template if the image is stitched. --Ermell 07:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door at Rue du Porche in Clairvaux-d'Aveyron 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gambetta College in Cahors 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Notre-Dame-des-Mines of Combes, southern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheerdown Hills in Fiordland National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 19:48, 9 April 2018 (utc)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Footstool 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, good quality. In this case it would have been beautiful if the sky would be really blue --Michielverbeek 07:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windows of the castle of Marqueyssac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice color of the window shutters. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former palace of justice and Pont-Vieux in Espalion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality. Perhaps a FP candidate? -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at rue Paul Gleyrose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Picturesque. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aroarokaehe Range 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It feels like you corrected it too much, but it's still hard to say, QI --Poco a poco 17:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in La Malene 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Considering the size of the photo, I think it's sharp enough and I enjoy the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Colours could be a bit more vivid. --Uoaei1 09:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Side of the Mount Belle 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordogne River 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Beynac 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood quality IMO --PJDespa 08:13, 11 April 2018 (utc)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Fine! --Palauenc05 11:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hollyford River NZ 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Fontfreyde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 69 rue Rinaldi in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Upper part of the photo slightly less sharp. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Highway 1 NZ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice Church of Usson 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Highway 1 NZ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:49, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence Street in Cruejouls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Acolyte NZ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Traverse in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Hooker River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 8 rue Maries in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Valady 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of Fiordland National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Firmi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Coussergues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 32 Rue Jules Guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail and good angle --Daniel Case 19:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Img Adelsdorf St.Stephan 2180393-HDR.jpg[edit]

Hy Tournasol7,

sorry for answering so late. The HDR photo you mentioned was created from 3 exposures all f 6,3 ISO 200 and the apertures 1/80, 1/1250 and 1/320. I processed in Photomatix and did not use a tripod.

regards --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Footstool from Kea Point 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 07:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Decazeville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too bad about the car on the right. But photo is ok for me.--Famberhorst 16:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 Place de la Caze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Some red CA along the roof/sky edge, invisible at 200% of screen. --Trougnouf 23:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Te Anau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the barn at La Croix d'Antoine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:51, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residential house in Pierrefiche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Peyrusse-le-Roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice picture --Verum 07:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Parentignat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't know how it got there but it's barely visible at 200% of monitor and the picture looks good --Trougnouf 21:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Notre-Dame du Gua in Aubin, eastern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif of Mount Crosscut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Pukaki 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Small but good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Castelnaud-la-Chapelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 10:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pukerau Red Tussock Scientific Reserve 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, will accept that as none of them seems to be the subject but many of them --Poco a poco 19:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Julian Church in Cransac, north-western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Peter Church of Canet-de-Salars, south-eastern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Montignac 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio serpens 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Leodegar Church of Bouzies 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Valzergues 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps a small horizontal perspective correction is needed. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 27 Place Jean Jacques Chapou in Cahors 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Valady 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Patrick Cathedral in Auckland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residue after the roman bridge pillar SEdO 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Austremoine Church of Issoire 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pachystegia insignis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bertholene 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wakatipu 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Well done!!, try get more tower on bottom the next time The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:51:26 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock La Popie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe it lacks a bit sharpness in the details but I think composition, light an colors are good and for me the motif looks quite interesting. So this image is good enough for QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 23:38, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare d'Issoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Composition with shadows isn't the best, but acceptable. --XRay 18:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade Peak and Bowen Falls 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek 07:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
ok The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:50:49 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch Chapel of Noailhac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Blaye-les-Mines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]