User talk:Tournasol7/Archive4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 16:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Can't really get a more straight on view with this angle. --Crisco 1492 05:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Route de Lunel in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe slightly overexposed but acceptable to me. Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Kroton 19:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont de Tresque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Church of Souyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eulalia Church of Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Parentignat 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dordogne River and Malartrie Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residue after the roman bridge pillar SEdO 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross dated 1789 in settlement Souyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments More then a Q1 Quality. No idea, why nobody nominate it. For me a ideal base for black&white. Colour is a little bit to real, means too much used. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queen Street in Auckland 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 02:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd increase contrast, but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 12:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue d'Armagnac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Salvy Church of Blaye 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

FP

Hi. Would this photo at FPC right now be your first FP if it's successful? PumpkinSky talk 15:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption of Les Pradeaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auckland Town Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Tarde in La Roque-Gageac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Phygelius capensis?.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maruia Falls 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canterbury Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. FPC? PumpkinSky 01:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Valady 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained glass window of the Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch Tram 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Tea Clipper' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty rose, very well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek 00:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 12 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Mercure in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of La Malene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Firmi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral Notre-Dame of Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael and All Angels Church in Castelnaud-la-Chapelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lake Tekapo 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Tekapo 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senecio serpens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 01:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey heron in Aveyron River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Tamora' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good picture of the rose. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Nothofagus_antarctica

Hej, przeglądałem Twoją galerię fotek z Dunedin i te podpisane jako Nothofagus antarctica rzuciły mi się w oczy - to na pewno nie jest to – zobacz inne fotki w kategorii. Trzeba by na razie przenieść do 'unidentyfied'. Jeśli mam ten sam gatunek sfotografowany i opisany inaczej to dam znać, ale na razie czasu mi brak na opracowanie zdjęć. Pozdrawiam Kenraiz (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• No to wychodzi na to, że to Nothofagus alpina (znów – zobacz w Google – wygląda jak ten z ogrodu w Dunedin, N. antarctica jest zupełnie odmienny.
• Przy okazji do Category:Portulacaria afra wrzuciłeś poprawną fotkę gatunku (Portulacaria afra 02.JPG), ale już na pozostałych (Portulacaria afra 01.JPG, 03, 04, 05) jest jakaś agawa. Kenraiz (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Quintinia acutifolia

I tutaj też to na pewno nie jest Quintinia acutifolia - zobacz w Googlu. Na zdjęciu jest jakiś przedstawiciel selerowatych/baldaszkowatych. Pozdrawiam Kenraiz (talk) 02:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of Henri Martin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Valady 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux pont d'Albi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Our Lady of Pity PlR 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little soft on the plants but I think otherwise OK for me. PumpkinSky 00:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge of Remembrance 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Hot Pants' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Lobelia laxiflora

Hej, mam prośbę, przyglądaj się trochę uważniej zdjęciom roślin, które wrzucasz. Pod nazwę Lobelia laxiflora załadowałeś dwa zdjęcia lobelii i dwa zdjęcia dalii - nie zauważyłeś, że to dwie zupełnie inaczej wyglądające rośliny? Salicyna (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maffre Church of Bruniquel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peyne riverbed 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of La Malene 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Valerie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crossing Mayoral Drive and Cook Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Sheila's Perfume' 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it me or is this leaning backwards? Other opinions invited. PumpkinSky 00:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Comment It´s not leaning backwards IMO.--Ermell 08:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)  SupportGood quality. --Berthold Werner 08:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Consular Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Maries in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Jumeaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 8 rue Maries in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halle de Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Ehrharta diplax

Hej, ta kategoria dot. gatunku trawy. Nie wiem co jest na zdjęciu, więc raczej do unidentified plants. Kenraiz (talk) 09:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Muehlenbeckia ephedroides

Tutaj Muehlenbeckia jest widoczna miejscami w postaci cienkich pędów, ale na zdjęciu widać przede wszystkim coś z rodzaju Anaphalioides i to raczej tam trzeba przenieść. Kenraiz (talk) 15:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Petrucia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachyglottis lagopus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sky Tower Auckland 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Pitie de Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate near lower castle in Peyrusse-le-Roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Traverse in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de l'Hôpital in Belves 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron 'Buttermint'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel Bontemps in Belves 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamb with mushroom sauce 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hereford Street in Christchurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de la Vinzelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant La Cascade 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Basile Morin 00:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 Worcester Street in Christchurch 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monkfish tail with saffron sauce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubaukirche in Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Belves 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Gruß an Coburg' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 10 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Gambetta and Barbier Gely's house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Denys Puech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left and right crops are kind of tight but ok for QI --PumpkinSky 00:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central courtyard of the Palais de la Berbie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frontage on the left bank of the Lot river in Espalion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium robertianum 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Firmi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiate Church of Our Lady of Grace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Sixflashphoto 00:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulin d'Aulanac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Sixflashphoto 00:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urospermum dalechampii in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Marcillac-Vallon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 1 in Wurzburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch Tram at Cathedral Square 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 Worcester Street in Christchurch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Belves 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Kilian's Cathedral from Domstrasse in Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Madame Charles' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Quality Image Barnstar
		For many valuable contributions to Commons and for QI images --PumpkinSky talk 23:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! War memorial in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Sputniktilt 09:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Porte Neuve 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte du Barry 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I assume that the perspective is correct. Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former mine La Découverte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12 Place de la Fontaine in Clermont-Ferrand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC) @Tournasol7: Please remove the CAs... --Basotxerri 08:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View on Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway viaduct near Valady.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cruejouls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grotte-chapelle de Notre-Dame de la Malene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Marqueyssac 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main street in Mayres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments C'est bon. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South facade of the Wurzburg Residence 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you try to clone out the cut-off edge of the roof? --Basotxerri 08:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)  Cloned, Tournasol7 20:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West facade of the Wurzburg Residence 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave toumeyana in Dunedin Botanic Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 00:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church of Gillorgues 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 08:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Lassouts 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Left side is pretty unsharp, but overall a good picture. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Belle Amour' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Saint-Martial Church in Marcillac-Vallon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed --Poco a poco 20:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotellerie de l abbaye Sainte-Foy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View on Bruniquel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Right bank of Tarn River in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Patrick Cathedral in Auckland 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenhouse in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corner of Grand Rue and Rue Rene Carmille in Domme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Valzergues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wurzburg Residence 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wisteria sinensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Parentignat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beschorneria tubiflora 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cours de Cicee in Belves 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des Tours in Domme 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubaukirche in Wurzburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four Points By Sheraton Auckland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant La Cascade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau d'Humieres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Bordes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee des Arts et Metiers Traditionnels 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barn of the Castle of Cas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChristChurch Cathedral 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai Beach 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC) FPC? PumpkinSky 00:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tax office in Swiecie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrel on the street in Beynac-et-Cazenac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankoniabrunnen Wurzburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Chanoine Andre Benazech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Berbiguières, western exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
  
•  Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 14:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Świecie – northern frontage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Not yet used but best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai Beach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Bastidou 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal Street in Christchurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:23, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Austremoine Church of Issoire 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Salles-la-Source 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It looks like leaning out, but I think it isn't. --XRay 23:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption of Les Pradeaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Marienberg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The guy pointing with his arm is distracting but ok --Poco a poco 10:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch's former Government Building 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in L’Union 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Haug Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of La Malene 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Cougousse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! College Laperouse in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Espalion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 Rue Corneboriol in Marcillac-Vallon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West facade of the Wurzburg Residence 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancien hopital de Grossia in Cahors 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spur building terrace of the Castle of Beynac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Rue Paul Reclus in Domme 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Galgan, northwest exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flowers of Ranunculus lyallii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 12 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of Henri Martin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Emile Roudier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 Worcester Street in Christchurch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Marienberg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Barre in Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Beynac-et-Cazenac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flowers of Calystegia pulchra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and good --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Cougousse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC) This is really good IMHO. FPC? PumpkinSky 00:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Cosmas Church 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the castle of Nonette 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de l'Hôpital in Belves 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

WSC2017 in France and Poland

Hi. While I was checking candidates for set of images in France for Wiki Science Competition 2017 I have noticed this one. You did this maybe on purpose because you are Polish and live in France, but it could also be more correct to move all the files as a set to one country? I am just curious, this does not change probably anything in practice.

Basically, Poland has not started yet, France has completed the selection. One of your image, evaluated singularly, arrived in 7th position ex aequo there but cannot be a finalist in the "general category" and also in the "set of images" because there are stronger candidates. I can show it in the "prefinalist" gallery.

I don't think you might have better chance in Poland, where there are even more competitors, but we can move them there and reevaluate them if you prefer.

Finally... I can also leave everything as it is, considering the images in France and Poland as single files. I just want to be sure 100% that is what you wanted since the beginning.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

We had New Zealand... but noone was uploading so we merged the category in the "rest of the world" (leftover countries). I can also put them in such category. Why not? Noone of this country-level selection has national prizes so it does not really matter. it0s the satisfaction of being a finalist. So formally, since you live in France and they are related to New Zealand, it is either France or New Zealand (that is, rest of the world). Let's put them in the "rest of the world", they will face less competition than in Poland (200 vs 400 files)--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

i tried to make it simple, I hope it will be more clear next edition. but I am revising them one by one so noone can say i don't care...--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christchurch's former Government Building 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Leon Gambetta in Cahors 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Galgan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de l'Hôpital in Belves 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral Notre-Dame of Rodez 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChristChurch Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Trémolière in Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de l'Auditoire in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worcester Street in Christchurch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in L’Union 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Galgan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte du Fer 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the Saint Martin Church of Cas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gambetta College in Cahors 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 253 Rue nationale in Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin Church of Mayres 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of the town hall of Belves 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Lake in Mount Cook National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotellerie de l abbaye Sainte-Foy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Jumeaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in La Malene.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Droite in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Haug Wurzburg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Gonzague Florens in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Chapel in Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Decazeville 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Charlemagne in Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 12 rue Sainte-Cecile in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Crop could be better. --XRay 05:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist Church in L’Union, southwest exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Charles (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Previous reviews

Scores: 
1. L'Union - Eglise extérieur.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) female.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:L'Union - Eglise extérieur.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Saint John the Baptist Church in L’Union 05.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 19:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Decazeville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Oulmet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Salvy Church of Blaye 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crossroad in Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Dalmazy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George Church in Saint-Georges-de-Levejac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Sainte-Enimie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Bonfire' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bonald 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Bordes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of former bishopric in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Leon Gambetta and Gambetta College in Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame de Prosperite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place de la Barrieyre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)