User talk:Tournasol7/Archive34

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sao Miguel do Castelo church in Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nossa Senhora da Oliveira church in Guimaraes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Dukes of Braganca in Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Brescia (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman theatre in Brescia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitoline temple in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pardulphus church in Frontenat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Treignat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church & bell tower of the old St Gervasius in Treignat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montlucon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, though it's slightly distorted (upper part is too high, probably due to the perspective correction method used). --Plozessor 18:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 rue de la Fontaine Montlucon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lamaids (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igreja de Ponte da Barca (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though the upper part with the statue is a bit bright -- Spurzem 18:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in Ponte da Barca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 18:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castelo de Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Santa Rosa de Lima (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 18:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Faustinus & Jovita church Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espigueiros do Lindoso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igreja de Ponte da Barca (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in Ponte da Barca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Fidelis basilica in Como (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwartzusterklooster in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Hall in Leuven (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Hall in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Jesus church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark but still ok. --Plozessor 04:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini from Belvedere dei Salviati (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 21:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franciscan church in Gniezno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Gniezno (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Gniezno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolegiaty 2 in Gniezno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumska 5 in Gniezno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the cathedral of Gniezno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franciscan church in Gniezno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boleslawa Chrobrego 44 in Gniezno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There's a dust spot directly over the pole on the left side --Imehling 21:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)  Done, dust spots removed.--Tournasol7 05:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks --Imehling 07:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usagasse 14 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usagasse 15 in Friedberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engelsgasse 11 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Seems minimally tilted to the right, but hard to judge sind the old buildings are crooked. --Plozessor 06:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engelsgasse 7 in Friedberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Friedberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In der Burg 32 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judengasse 10-12-14 Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judengasse 20 in Friedberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usagasse 16 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usagasse 3 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedberg Castle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In der Burg 33 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In der Burg 34 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In der Burg 20-22 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In der Burg 23 in Friedberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern gate of the Burg Friedberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall of the Burg Friedberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George fountain in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolfsturm in Friedberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northern gate of the Burg Friedberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenzgasse 9 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 123 in Weinheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 137 in Weinheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 138 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 149 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Jesus church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantheon in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohgasse 4 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerbergasse 4 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a touch too dark. --XRay 05:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerbergasse 10 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtmuehlgasse 2 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenzgasse 13 in Weinheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Weinheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgasse 2 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgasse 1 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 107 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judengasse 4 in Weinheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judengasse 5 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judengasse 9 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quergaesschen 1 in Weinheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohgasse 5 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Gniezno (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite dark ... --Plozessor 06:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)  Done.--Tournasol7 20:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)  Support A bit more noise than before, but given that the picture was taken at evening, it is ok now. --Plozessor 18:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 13:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Jesus church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Jesus church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 27 in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 31 Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staupenbrunnen at Markt in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Institutstrasse 23 in Weinheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Statue of Nimeno II.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domstrasse 2 in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 5 in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maximus church in Merseburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 21 in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merseburg Castle (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zechsches Palais in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberaltenburg 2 in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarze Bastion in Merseburg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krummes Tor in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (11).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (11).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fingerpost at Domplatz in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate at Domplatz in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loewentor in the Merseburg Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merseburg Cathedral (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merseburg Castle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good except just needs some color noise reduction. Can you please update the file with this fix? --Jay.Jarosz 16:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC) The photo was taken by me, so I take the liberty of replying, and I honestly don't know what kind of noise you are talking about...--Tournasol7 11:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) I see slight CA at the cross and at the left roof, but no color noise actually. --Plozessor 11:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC) I am sorry, but I disagree. I think in this form it is good enough for QI. I would ask others for their opinion.--Tournasol7 20:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good from my point of view; if someone disagrees let him move it to discussions. --Plozessor 18:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good except just needs some color noise reduction. Can you please update the file with this fix? --Jay.Jarosz 16:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC) The same; I don't know what kind of noise you are talking about...--Tournasol7 11:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Jay.Jarosz?--Tournasol7 20:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good from my point of view; if someone disagrees let him move it to discussions. --Plozessor 18:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 23:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Forgues HG (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Plagnole (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Frajou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Anan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Anan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 12:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domplatz 2 in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merseburg Cathedral (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domplatz 9 in Merseburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domstrasse 15 in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd have cropped more at the bottom, but ok --Poco a poco 09:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merseburg Castle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dompropstei 3 in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sylvester I of the Capite church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sylvester I of the Capite church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two big dust spots on the left side --Plozessor 05:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)  Done, dust spots removed.--Tournasol7 14:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgium castle in Dessau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venus Medici statue in Georgengarten Dessau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitchen building in Georgengarten in Dessau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sixtus church in Merseburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maximus chapel in Merseburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George church in Dessau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Naumann-Strasse 2 in Dessau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Dessau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Dessau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Dessau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maximus chapel in Merseburg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saale river in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dompropstei in Merseburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Viernheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Twelve Apostles church in Viernheim (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelical church in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Gall church in Ladenburg (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannbau palace in Dessau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braugasse 21 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchgasse 11 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchgasse 10 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchgasse 13 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenplatz 12 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterstadt 1 in Lich (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterstadt 14 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterstadt 13-15 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterstadt 3-5 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossgasse 4 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Montesanto in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Montesanto in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 42 in Lich (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 31 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 2 in Lich (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterstadt 1 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sunny365days 14:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 Slovenija

Dear Krzysztof, thank you for participating in the fifth Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Slovenia! The jury has completed scoring the contributions and we will announce the winners this Thursday, 14th December, at 15h. This time, the announcement will be live, at the Restoration centre of the Institute for the protection Cultural Heritage, Poljanska 40, Ljubljana (invitation here). A bit late (sorry), but you are cordially invited! — Yerpo ^Eh? 18:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Yerpo; I regret to inform you that I will not be able to attend the meeting. I'm so sorry... Tournasol7 (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburg Abbey (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 40 in Lich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 48 in Lich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 2 in Lich (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:San Carlo al Corso in Rome (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Carlo al Corso in Rome (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 50 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 2 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 4 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 12 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Eberstadt (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 10:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atypical chess pieces (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Ruggell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Ruggell (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Ruggell (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 05:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Ruggell (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 05:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 11 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 4 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 14 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 20 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 2 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Lich (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 5 in Heppenheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 5 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 16 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 2 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchagaessle 1 in Bendern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rectory in Bendern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alviergruppe from Bendern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 13:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary of the People church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damarri Kalea 1 Hondaribbia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate at Javier Ugarte Kalea in Hondaribbia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rectory in Bendern (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Bendern (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alviergruppe & Alpstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 14 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Schellenberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Schellenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fingerpost in Schellenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpstein from Schellenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Athanasius church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 21:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent photo, good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 18:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsgebaeude in Vaduz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verweserhaus in Vaduz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untere Burg Castle in Schellenberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Schellenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Wesołych Świąt!

Wesołych Świąt i zdrowego, szczęśliwego Nowego Roku 2024! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays

✴ Happy Holidays, Krzysztof ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 5 in Schaan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Schaan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Schellenberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpstein from Schellenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 25 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Bendern (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again, why so dark? This uses less than 80 % of JPG brightness range. Also it looks unnatural due to the extreme PC; personally I'd stretch it horizontally by maybe 10 %. --Plozessor 05:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Sorry, but I disagree. The PC is well done, horizonthal lines straight. It's not leaning in reality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Y, horizontal lines are horizontal, I just meant the the church seems to appear higher than it is in reality. But that's not the big issue here, I'd accept that. What about the brightness? --Plozessor 07:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) It was the end of the day, and in addition it was very cloudy. The lighting reflects well the atmosphere of the time. Of course, too dark a photo is not a good idea, but I think that here it is within reason. --Tournasol7 17:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)  Support I'd prefer a brighter version (for me it looks way better after simple contrast stretching). But this is a matter of taste, and the picture is otherwise good. --Plozessor 20:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dei Miracoli in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Schaan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsgebaeude in Vaduz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Again I'd prefer it brighter (this picture uses only 92 % of the available range), but otherwise it is very good. --Plozessor 05:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verweserhaus in Vaduz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Bendern (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Schaan (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Piding (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Piding (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dei Miracoli in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dei Miracoli in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini from Gianicolo Hill (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpstein from Schellenberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2023/2024!

		* Happy Holidays 2023/2024, Tournasol7! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2024. --Llez (talk) 06:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

@Llez: , thank you :) Tournasol7 (talk) 08:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

		🌟 Happy Holidays, Krzysztof! 🌟
		The turn of the year is approaching and with it the time for reflection. Let's take a moment and reflect a little. It is a time of festivals of light, from Hanukkah to Yule to Christmas, and in many cultures and religions it is a time of holidays, sometimes also family celebrations. And let's not forget that, according to our calendar, the new year is just around the corner. I wish you all: Joyeux Noël • Priecigus Ziemassvetkus • Fröhliche Weihnachten • Linksmu Kaledu • Merry Christmas • Il-Milied It-Tajjeb • Chestita Koleda • Vrolijk Kerstfeest • Glædelig Jul • Wesolych Swiat Bozego Narodzenia • Feliz Navidad • Feliz Natal • Roomsaid Joulu Puhi • Craciun Fericit • Iloista Joulua • Veselé Vianoce • Kala Christouyenna • Vesel Bozic • Kellemes Karácsonyi Ünnepeket • God Jul • Nollaig Shona Duit • Veselé Vánoce • Buon Natale • Mo’adim Lesimkha • I’D Miilad Said • Kung His Hsin Nien • Krismas Njema Na Heri    -- Dietmar (aka XRay) talk 08:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Dietmar! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 08:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël et bonne année !

souhaite de tout coeur Reinhold Möller / Ermell (talk) 10:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Ermell (talk) 10:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pampinot Kalea in Hondaribbia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxkueneko Murrua Kalea 1 in Hondaribbia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Hernani (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damarri Kalea 1 Hondaribbia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Nikolas Kalea 6 in Hondaribbia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Florinsgasse 7 in Vaduz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regierungsgebaeude in Vaduz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vaduz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damarri Kalea 1 Hondaribbia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Nikolas Kalea 2 in Hondaribbia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Pierre André (talk) 15:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church in Bendern (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why so dark? --Plozessor 05:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Rainy weather and the end of the day. Here, I had to find a compromise between lightening and a noisy effect. --Tournasol7 19:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC) But you could easily brighten it, the picture uses less than 80 % of the dynamic range and has low noise. --Plozessor 06:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 08:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Looking good now! --Plozessor 11:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kale Nagusia 2 in Hernani (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Tolosa (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan de Arramele chapel in Tolosa (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naparzubia in Tolosa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 5-6 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtbrunnen in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgasse 10 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 16 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 18 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 12 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Heppenheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 5 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 6 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Athanasius church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Athanasius church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Heppenheim (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Graben 6 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 24 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 5 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 6 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Via church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautufiul light and good composition, but bottom might have been a bit sahrper --Michielverbeek 16:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Carlos V in Hondarribia (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sta Maria del Manzano church in Hondaribbia (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Mariako portoia in Hondaribbia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Hondaribbia (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolosa International Puppet Center (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 15:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 16:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Dormitaleria in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Errota in Beasain (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Augustine convent in Hernani (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Jauregia in Beasain (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza palace, chapel & bridge in Beasain (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Llez 06:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Estella-Lizarra (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Castillo in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Pamplona (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Nuevo in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 03:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Kings of Navarre in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Kings of Navarre in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit dark ... --XRay 07:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Fermin de Aldapa church in Pamplona (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Bartolomeo all'Isola basilica in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Bartolomeo all'Isola basilica in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre church in Estella-Lizarra (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael Archangel church in Estella-Lizarra (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican convent in Estella-Lizarra (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Carcel in Estella-Lizarra (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estella Bus Station (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los Fueros in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre church in Torres del Rio (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Los Arcos (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Reyes de Navarra in Estella-Lizarra (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Logrono (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francesco a Ripa in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite dark, but it was evening and the picture seems to capture the atmosphere. --Plozessor 19:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Logrono (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Coso 2 in Viana (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Anoa y Busto in Viana (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Viana (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francesco a Ripa in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Lawrence church in Schaan (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Lawrence church in Schaan (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortification of Revelin in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Iketsi 05:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala Amos Salvador in Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament of La Rioja (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Piedra in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Fermin chapel in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Navarra in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Tolono Mountains (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Berria 1 in Laguardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Laguardia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary of the Kings church in Laguarda (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone church in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas church in Haro (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy, but not disturbing. --XRay 08:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Laguardia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala Amos Salvador in Logrono (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament of La Rioja (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary of the People church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Las Sevillanas in Haro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Haro (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C. la Paz 4 in Haro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas church in Haro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Miranda de Ebro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge of Carlos III in Miranda de Ebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Brinas (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Brinas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Las Sevillanas in Haro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giovanni Calibita church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Miranda de Ebro (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Urbina & Casa de las Cadenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Miranda de Ebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Miranda de Ebro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio Fray Zacarias Martinez in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espainia Plaza in Vitoria-Gasteiz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial Centre Victims of Terrorism Museum in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok, though I'd increase brightness a bit. --Plozessor 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Miranda de Ebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Wawelno (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Walcz (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Walcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration of Jesus Christ church in Slutowo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trivio church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Brojce (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stanislaus church in Miedzichowo (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Koronowo (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 29 in Hann. Muenden (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 31 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but isn't it Burgstraße 31 and 33? --Llez 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC) You are right. I have  corrected it. --Tournasol7 07:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 33 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 47 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 50 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Orto in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Orto in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 23:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (12).jpg

And also:

• File:St Martin church in Lagardiolle (13).jpg

Yours sincerely, Traumrune (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchplatz 7 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 7 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 11 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 12 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgstrasse 13 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 51 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 55 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. I'd reduce blue a bit but that is probably a matter of taste. --Plozessor 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 57 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 63 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 100 in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Most memorable shot

Hi Tournasol7, the 2023 iteration of Your most memorable shot has arrived. Maybe you want to enrich it with one of your photos? That would be great! Just wanting to help to spread a nice idea, best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Aristeas; thanks for your message. I didn't know that such a site existed. I added my most memorable shot :) Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Strasse 2-4 in Hann. Muenden (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welfenschloss in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydekumstrasse 13-15 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles church in Hann. Muenden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20-cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xylanderstrasse 4 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westring 18 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Strasse 2-4 in Hann. Muenden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche in Landau (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reiterstrasse 3-5 in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trappengasse 11-13 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trappengasse 2 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 21 in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Landau (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerberstrasse 20 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pietro in Montorio in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice lateral light. --Aristeas 19:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pietro in Montorio in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 19:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 88 in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 48 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeerenturm in Landau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaufhausgasse in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharinenkapelle in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 52-54 in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equestrian statue of Luitpold of Bavaria in Landau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Kaufhaus in Landau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langstrasse 3 in Landau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 89 in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Landau (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeckingsches Palais in Landau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 63 in Bad Bergzabern (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 14 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 11 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 18 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 50 in Bad Bergzabern (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 55 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 57 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Bad Bergzabern (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchgasse 1 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obere Berggasse 3 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pass 9 in Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aul in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigstrasse 42 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Koenigstrasse 45 in Bad Bergzabern (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koenigstrasse 45 in Bad Bergzabern (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz in Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pass 3 in Zwingenberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pass 9 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loewenplatz 6 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)