User talk:Tournasol7/Archive32

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michelle Gisin Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucas Braathen Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Steen Olsen Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina Fuerst Holtmann Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd ru (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zan Kranjec Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gino Caviezel Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leona Popovic Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Castle of Nassigny (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Nassigny (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Steen Olsen Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexis Pinturault Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ali Nullmeyer Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina Fuerst Holtmann Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd ru (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leona Popovic Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thea Louise Stjernesund Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coralie Frasse-Sombet Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linus Strasser Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daniel Yule Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikaela Shiffrin Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd run (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petra Vlhova Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ana Bucik Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thea Louise Stjernesund Grandvalira 2023 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loic Meillard Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dave Ryding Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clement Noel Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexis Pinturault Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 13:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic Alt del Cubil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Casamanya & Aspres de l'Ensegur (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap de Tosa d'Entor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Torradella (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de la Pala Alta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alex Vinatzer Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrea Ellenberger Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Therese Tviberg Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ricarda Haaser Grandvalira 2023 GS 2nd run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circ dels Pessons (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikaela Shiffrin Grandvalira 2023 SL 2nd run (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Casamanya & Aspres de l'Ensegur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-14 rue Carnot in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9-11 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Epernay (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gabrielle-Dorziat theatre in Epernay (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 avenue de Champagne in Epernay (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7 rue du Docteur-Verron in Epernay (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Le Breuil Marne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue du General de Gaulle in Orbais-l'Abbaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5-7 place Royale in Reims (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sebastian Foss Solevag Grandvalira 2023 SL 1st run (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Montmirail (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Sainte-Croix in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycee Thibaut-de-Champagne in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.---Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Gambetta in Orbais-l'Abbaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Orbais-l'Abbaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapter house in Orbais-l'Abbaye (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Orbais-l'Abbaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montmirail (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Thermes de Cransac (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thermes de Cransac (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue aux Oignons in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 47 rue du Val in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue Saint-Jean in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Saint-Jean in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue la Chapelle Saint-Jean in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferme de la Madeleine in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 rue de Jouy in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 rue de Jouy in Provins (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Jouy in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grange aux Dimes in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grange aux Dimes in Provins (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 rue Saint-Jean in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 54, 56, 58 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 52 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Missy-sur-Yonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Orbais-l'Abbaye (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapter house in Orbais-l'Abbaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Orbais-l'Abbaye (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montmirail (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Montmirail (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-15 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue of Epernay (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Epernay (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Neuvy-sur-Barangeon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Neuvy-sur-Barangeon (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de la Coquille in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 rue de Jouy in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 rue Saint-Jean in Provins (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue Saint-Jean in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning of User:Tournasol7/Queue to QIC[edit]

Hello Krzysztof Golik ! If you agree, I will delete some picture already QI of User:Tournasol7/Queue to QIC. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sebring12Hrs, Il n'y a pas de problème :) Bonne journée à toi! Tournasol7 (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Menetreol-sur-Sauldre (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villeneuve-la-Guyard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Voulx (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Epernay (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecclesiastical Tribunal in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 16:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place Royale in Reims (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5-7 place Royale in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Montmirail (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Neuvy-sur-Barangeon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 rue Couverte in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 05:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14 rue du Palais in Provins (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 54, 56, 58 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villeneuve-la-Guyard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Voulx (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Menetreol-sur-Sauldre (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Menetreol-sur-Sauldre (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9-11 place Royale in Reims (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Epernay (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Soca river near Kamno (8).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soca river near Kamno (8).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Epernay (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Montmirail (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14 rue du Palais in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 rue de Jouy in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 rue Carnot in Reims (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Ottmarsheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Ottmarsheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Bernard priory in Ottmarsheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Ottmarsheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 54 rue Saint-Thibault in Provins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 07:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Tronsson Ducoudray in Reims (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Tronsson Ducoudray in Reims (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de la Coquille in Provins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 17:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Ottmarsheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 rue du Babil in Selestat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 rue des Bateliers in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 place d'Armes in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue de la Jauge in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Adelphus church in Kingersheim (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 place du Marche aux Choux in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 44 rue des Chevaliers in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 rue du Babil in Selestat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 place du Marche aux Choux in Selestat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 rue des Bateliers in Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Selestat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 place du Marche aux Choux in Selestat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trou de Bozouls (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Calmont (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Calmont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julitta church in Milhac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in Le Piboul (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Tayac (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Ax-les-Thermes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Prades (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Coudons (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Cosmas and Damian church in Belcaire (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CH Jean Duvernoy in Montaillou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND-des-Carnesses chapel in Montaillou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Espezel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ginoles (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Ginoles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Felix Armand in Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Joseph Erminy in Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aude river in Quillan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Quillan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Quillan (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bellis perennis in Aude (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunaria annua in Aude (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Mairie in Quillan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Coustaussa (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Rennes-le-Chateau (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water tower in Rennes-le-Chateau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Magdala in Rennes-le-Chateau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Rennes-le-Chateau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Coustaussa (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Serres Aude (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Arques Aude (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Arques (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Arques (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue des Tineries in Lagrasse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orbieu river in Lagrasse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Magene in Lagrasse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Sibra in Lagrasse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Castel in Lagrasse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Deux Ponts in Lagrasse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Albieres (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Mouthoumet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Mouthoumet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Termes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage Saint-Martin in Limoux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross in Alet-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 rue Calviere in Alet-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Pennautier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pennautier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Julian & Basilissa church in Ventenac-Cabardes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de l'Abbe in Ventenac-Cabardes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Alzonne (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pezens (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Papoul (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbey of Saint-Polycarpe (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Clermont-sur-Lauquet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Labastide-en-Val (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge in Labastide-en-Val (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau de Labastide in Labastide-en-Val (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Stephen church in Labastide-en-Val (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villar-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Villetritouls (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Taurize (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Servies-en-Val (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Rieux-en-Val (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Pradelles-en-Val (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Pradelles-en-Val (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pradelles-en-Val (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Monze (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 boulevard Camille Pelletan in Carcassonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burned area in Massif de la Clape (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Gruissan (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cistus albidus in Massif de la Clape (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Rather bright, reducing the exposure may improve it. --Tagooty 00:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genista scorpius in Massif de la Clape (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Fonties-d'Aude (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marcellus church in Fonties-d'Aude (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Fine Arts in Carcassonne (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portail des Jacobins in Carcassonne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Comps-la-Grand-Ville (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Hilarius church in St-Hilaire (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Madonna and Child in Tremouilles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul church in Peyriac-de-Mer (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Peyriac-de-Mer (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fingerpost at Pied du Mour (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linum narbonense in Peyriac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Asson (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in Figueres (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Acisclus & Victoria church in Bascara (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Girona (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality..--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Pia Almoina in Girona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onyar river in Girona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Tremouilles (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martial church in Tremouilles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Pieta in Vic (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Besalu in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la Ciutat in Vic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Moixo in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan (6).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan (6).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 church towers in Girona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Pieta in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Moixo in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Comella in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edifici de la Llotja in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Vic (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Colomer in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the Montserrat abbey (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vell in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa d'Exercicis Espirituals from Pont Vell in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa d'Exercicis Espirituals in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antic Palau del Consell in Manresa (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis church in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Montserrat church in Manresa (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary basilica in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Post office of Mont-de-Marsan (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Post office of Mont-de-Marsan (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de Manresa in Suria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Cardona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de la Minyona in Cardona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cardona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cardona (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cal Verdaguer in Avinyo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in Avinyo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Girona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Sant Roc in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal del Pont in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in Solsona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Font de la placa de Sant Joan in Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vell in Avinyo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de l'Abadal in Avinyo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Rosary church in Suria (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Rolland in Carcassonne (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cal Mossen Andreu in La Seu d'Urgell (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in La Seu d'Urgell (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael church in La Seu d'Urgell (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal del Castell in Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Font de Sant Isidre in Solsona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Mercy church in Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castellvell in Solsona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Organya (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 61 in Ladenburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 5 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelberger Strasse 2 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 51 in Ladenburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse in Ladenburg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 23 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 17 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 11 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guentherschem Waisenhaus in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 35 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse in Ladenburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 3 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinheimer Strasse 46 in Viernheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannheimer Strasse 36 in Viernheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QI vote[edit]

Hi Tournasol, just saw this edit and wondered whether you actually meant to oppose based on the comment and the vote count? Cheers, BigDom (talk) 15:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BigDom: sorry, my mistake. I corrected it. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks. Just wanted to check as I've been going through updating counts and closing old nominations. BigDom (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 61 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 53 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 7 in Ladenburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse in Ladenburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 3 in Ladenburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchenstrasse 5 in Ladenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 25 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 37 in Ladenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannheimer Strasse 36 in Viernheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiserstrasse 10 in Friedberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celje National Hall (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Celje (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celje Cathedral (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water tower in Ptuj (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town tower in Ptuj (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bled Island (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bled Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forte de Sao Joao Baptista da Foz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre dos Clerigos in Porto (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja da Trindade in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja de Santo Ildefonso in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Porto (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja do Carmo in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bled Island & Bled Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support FP candidate? --SHB2000 09:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelo do Queijo (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South domus of the Monte Padrao hill fort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Assumption church in Monte Cordova (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Nacional Sao Joao in Porto (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelourinho do Porto (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralhas fernandinas do Porto (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja dos Clerigos in Porto (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rampa do Infante Santo in Vila Nova de Gaia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stifone 08:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosteiro da Serra do Pilar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But: Contrast could be improved. --XRay 05:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Marestaing (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Quiteria church in Marestaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Castillon-Saves (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Fregouville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Fregouville (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Maurens Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Maurens (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Abdon and Sennen church in Lahas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-de-Dieuzaide chapel in Baupas (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Noilhan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cazaux-Saves (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Save river in Cazaux-Saves (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Magdalene church in Cazaux-Saves (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lahas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Magdalene church in Cazaux-Saves (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pompiac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Nizas Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Romanus church in Nizas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pardulphus church in Pompiac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lahillaire (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Samatan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Romanus church in Nizas (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Savignac-Mona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Felix church in Savignac-Mona (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Monblanc (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Lahillaire (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Chanoine Dieuzaide in Samatan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Samatan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bark of Platanus x hispanica (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puylausic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Puylausic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Monblanc (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Samatan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Samatan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Montegut-Saves (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Sauvimont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Sauvimont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Amades (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in St-Loube (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in Castillon-Saves (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Laymont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Laymont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montpezat Gers (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill in Gensac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Montpezat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Lizier-du-Plante (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin chapel in Gensac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Montpezat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lycerius church in St-Lizier-du-Plante (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Garravet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James the Greater church in Garravet (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montadet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Montadet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Espaon (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Espaon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but the curch is shadowed unfortunately --Michielverbeek 05:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Cadeillan (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary cathedral in Lombez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bezeril (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Bezeril (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in Montiron (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Aurimont (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in St-Andre (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Gimont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady chapel in Cahuzac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montiron (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrenees seen from Montiron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Villefranche-d'Astarac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Gaujan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 01:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anne church in Gaujan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Molas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Molas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Aurimont (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aurimont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villefranche-d'Astarac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of L'Isle-en-Dodon (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Adrian church in L'Isle-en-Dodon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Tournan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germerius church in Tournan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Sabaillan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Sabaillan (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Pellefigue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Pellefigue (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Gaujac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Gaujac (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montamat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Montamat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Soulan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in St-Soulan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Gaujac Gers (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Larroucau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Mongausy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in St-Soulan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Mongausy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rural landscape of Mongausy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Our Lady church in Polastron (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Laurac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Stephen church in Pontejac (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Tirent (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Fangeau (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Mongausy (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Martin-Gimois (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-Gimois (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Our Lady church in Polastron (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piediluco 07:05, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bedechan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Abdon and Sennen church in Bedechan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Cransac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Is (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-de-Limouze (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-de-Limouze (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermes de Cransac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station in Cransac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside cross in Rulhe-Haut (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manor in Rulhe-Haut (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Stephen church in Rulhe-Haut (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Auzits (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John chapel in L'Hopital (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Dionysius church in Escandolieres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Escandolieres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-de-Limouze (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Pachins (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Drulhe (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Drulhe (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lanuejouls (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Baudilus church in Lanuejouls (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gerald church in La Capelle del Vern (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Glassac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Sauvage priory (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Vaureilles (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bezeril (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office of Mont-de-Marsan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 pl du Gen Leclerc in Mont-de-Marsan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theatre of Mont-de-Marsan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 23 rue Victor Hugo in Mont-de-Marsan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge over the Adour river in Dax (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office of Mont-de-Marsan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Mirasol in Mont-de-Marsan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in Mont-de-Marsan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue du 8 Mai 1945 in Mont-de-Marsan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Polastron Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Baudilus church in Lanuejouls (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified tower in Demu (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Arvieu (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Centrale in Manciet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Mercy church in Manciet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 05:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Grandfuel (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge in Grandfuel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Julietta church in Ste-Juliette-sur-Viaur (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans church in Magrin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Arvieu (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amandus church in Arvieu (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Clauzelles (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Carcenac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans church in St-Amans Salmiech (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]