User talk:Tournasol7/Archive3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 12:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Saint Mary Church of Nasbinals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Merci --Moroder 08:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Remparts in Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte du Vainqueur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Severac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene church in Belcastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 14 rue de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, I'd give it a try at FPC --Poco a poco 08:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Droite in Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Place du Balat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --ArildV 06:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outbuildings at the Castle of Cas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 22:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 6 Place du Vigan in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand-Rue de la Barbacane 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Severac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Chantepleures in Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outbuildings at the Castle of Cas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansion in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Ondes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Severac 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is tilted. Natural? PumpkinSky 16:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 20:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC) @PumpkinSky: , you can check it? Tournasol7 21:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC) OK now. PumpkinSky 22:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 12 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Saint Michael Church CsC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry at the Saint Catherine Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte du Vainqueur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montricoux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Grand Rue Raimond VII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, --SKas 07:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry in Coussergues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansion in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient royal Castle of Caylus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remember to categorize properly. --MB-one 14:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de l'Horloge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View on Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:View of present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:View of present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:View of present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 03.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:View of present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Rue Saint-Louis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 32 Grand Rue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better, thank you --Poco a poco 14:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capelette Saint-Jacques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Consular Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 05:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-es-Liens Church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Horizontal perspective correction of File:Window of Maison Gaugiran.jpg

Hello, you can please elaborate what you mean by "I cannot do it" as answer to my request to apply an horizontal perspective correction? Do you mean that you don't know how to do it? What tool are you using? that's actually an easy fix. --Poco² 17:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

You forgot me? Poco² 14:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

I gave it a try and uploaded a new version (also included the adjustments in the change summary). You don't have to keep it if you don't like it, just revert if that's the case, or upload your own version with those settings. Poco² 11:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Place du Sombral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot? (see images note). Otherwise QI imo.  Cloned, Tournasol7 22:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 09:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 16 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell towers of Church of Cornusson 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 07:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross on Vieux Pont in Belcastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of Henri Martin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Gonzague Florens in Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des Ormeaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Halle SANV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 16 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peyne riverbed 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Denys Puech 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a little perspective correction to the left (see note) and I would make the image a bit wider --Michielverbeek 05:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Perspective is  Done, but the image it can't be wider. Tournasol7 14:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC) A weak support --Michielverbeek 06:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop out the roof part on the right. But even so, easily a QI. --MB-one 13:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius Church of Loubers 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough from me Sixflashphoto 04:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Gonzague Florens in Conques 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand-Rue de l'Horloge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Cayrade in Decazeville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tiltd CCW little bit. Image should be rotate to the right --Halavar 11:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Goorsse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Cayrade in Decazeville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentIt's looking good, but at the left it is just not straight enough for me (see note)--Michielverbeek 07:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC) I do it this afternoon, Tournasol7 07:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 14:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot this photo, IMO not perfect, but indeed good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist office in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 08:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Maison Goorsse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you add some window-related category, please? Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de La Guioule-sous-Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 09:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Crucifix Chapel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI to me -- Sixflashphoto 05:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Valerie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Parentignat 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Paul Gleyrose 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pierrefiche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue near Saint Crucifix Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality now -- Sixflashphoto 08:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of the castle of Fayrac and Beynac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little oversharp on the horizont, but almost good. --Moahim 08:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont de Tresque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lot River in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Saint Dionysius Church of Loubers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 15:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucanthemum vulgare 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

QIC File:2017 - banner - Київ - Поштова площа та Поділ.jpg

Hello, Tournasol7! I have cropped this pano File:2017 - banner - Київ - Поштова площа та Поділ.jpg several days ago, as You adviced, so can You look at it again? --Moahim (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 22 Grand Rue Raimond VII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Leris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the castle of Nonette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-es-Liens Church 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Loubers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 10:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top quarter is soft but still OK to me. -- Sixflashphoto 20:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side door of the Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of La Malene 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Antonin Church in Saint-Antonin-Noble-Val 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte du Barry 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the house at 2 Rue Saint-Louis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a window-related category. --Basotxerri 15:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)  Category added, Tournasol7 22:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK for me but as it seems a bit hazy it would get better if you applied a bit of clarity (maybe contrast, too) in Lightroom. Could you please try? --Basotxerri 07:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC) I try tomorow, Tournasol7 22:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)  Done. Is it better? Tournasol7 13:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Much better, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 14:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du Buoc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee Rignault 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint-Antonin Church SANV 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Jules Guesde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Daura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 08:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-es-Liens Church 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 16 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Qoan 12:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Hotel du Ravieux from Rue du Cours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Bastidou 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey heron in Aveyron River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Senezergues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle towering over the town of Penne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faust Church of Aboul 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential house in Penne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Teysseroles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Capricorn4049 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross near the church in settlment Saint-Igne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Capricorn4049 21:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Vindrac-Alayrac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo, but please remove some space in sky --Michielverbeek 04:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 20:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Capricorn4049 12:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du 13e siecle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bonald 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Beteille in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 07:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Julien in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Chargnat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of La Malene 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 rue d'Armagnac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Saint Faith Church in Montrozier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Teysseroles 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dordogne River 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A nice photo. --B dash 08:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --B dash 08:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --B dash 08:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant La Cascade 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 23:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont de Tresque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Pierre es Liens Church of Verfeil sur Seye 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Valid for all your five nominated images: they seem to be a bit underexposed and maybe the WB isn't perfect, but overall they are sharp and the highlights and shadows have been treated reasonably. --Granada 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Catherine Church of Penne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of Henri Martin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 10 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the castle of Nonette 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Gonzague Florens in Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Penne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Parish Church of Salles-la-Source 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 35 Rue Jules Guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue d'Armagnac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crossroads in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Martin-de-Lenne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 5 TL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View on Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe categorization should be better. --XRay 05:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC) Quality image, in my opinion, without prejudice to your comment. What other category should be used? -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)  Categories added Tournasol7 20:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Thank you. IMO OK now. --XRay 06:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cahors 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Categories improvable. Name of the street? --XRay 04:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the castle of Marqueyssac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A little bit dark. Resolution could be better. --XRay 04:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Urban Church of Vezac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 06:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any comments? Tournasol7 14:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Lots of spots (insects, birds) - could you remove them, please? Otherwise good. --Basotxerri 16:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 20:01, 29 October 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 16:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC) It needs a bit more of exposure, it is too dark Poco a poco 08:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroen 2CV AZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! What a rare beauty! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael and All Angels Church in Castelnaud-la-Chapelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 03:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue d'Aubuly 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. But a few particles in the air.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 02:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Laval de Peyrusse-le-Roc 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 02:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 02:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Tour in Onet-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments purple spots in the sky. Can you delete that? Good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dordogne River and Malartrie Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - You might want to dial back the highlights just a bit, but that's a beautiful motif and a good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Lots of unsharpness in the picture frame, but the tower is defined in the file description as the subject of the photo, and it's sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Very late

I am sorry. I forgot my review. Best regards--ArildV (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 01:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 16:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 14:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare d'Issoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Cayrade in Decazeville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please see images note.--ArildV 07:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)  Done Tournasol7 20:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC) Template:Ping:ArildV, can you check it, please? Tournasol7 23:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Im sorry, QI.--ArildV 16:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corner street of St Cecile and St Clair in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, IMO. --JiriMatejicek 21:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Severac 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Headframe in former mine La Découverte 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Bertholene 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Espalion 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption of Les Pradeaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Souyri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence Church of Cruejouls 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central courtyard of the Palais de la Berbie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antonin Church of Nauviale 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Headframe in former mine La Découverte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Espalion 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame de Prosperite 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 11:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Issoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Swiecie 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 10:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Wellington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 10:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Austremoine Church of Issoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Laperouse in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the Church of Souyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Peyrat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quallity --Llez 07:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Espalion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vertical (and in this case also the horizontals) are not perfectly done, but IMO good enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 08:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church of Nonette 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of the Church of Cornusson 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux pont d'Albi 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jean Baptiste Church of Noailhac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of La Malene 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battlements of the former bishopric in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ranunculus lyallii in Fiordland National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castle of Marqueyssac 16.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Marqueyssac 16.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

• Congratulations! This one is for you. Well done! --cart-Talk 14:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lyndon 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Fontaine Clermont-Ferrand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Bousquet in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 15:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de la Pelissaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:10, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eulalia Church of Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lot River in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiate Church of Saint John.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows are regrettable. But good image quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee Rignault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Enfield 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful motorcycle, QI. Do you know when it was built? -- Spurzem 17:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faust Church of Aboul 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Marqueyssac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dordogne River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better, if you reduce the brightness at the building. (For example "lights" at the tone curve with Adobe Lightroom.) --XRay 06:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sign of Way of Saint James in Cahors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antonin Church of Nauviale 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Decazeville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Pelissaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist office in Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene Church of Orsonnette 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de François Cabrol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, not very shadowed, sharp enough and I am able to read the name of the person. Well done --Michielverbeek 07:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice Church of Usson 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 22:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith Chapel in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa canina 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice Church of Usson 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the castle of Nonette 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea in Aboul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene Church of Albi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orb River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 8 rue Maries in Albi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bonald 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of La Malene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)