User talk:Tournasol7/Archive29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Teyssieu (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Latouille (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ladirat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Julian church in Frayssinhes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Labathude (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Virgin church in La Remise (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Labathude (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Terrou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bave river near Terrou (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael church in St-Michel-Loubejou (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Genevieve church in Cornac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Prudhomat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Estal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-des-Bois (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Glanes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Glanes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Teyssieu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Latouille-Lentillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Julian church in Frayssinhes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Guierle in Bretenoux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Bonneviole (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Saint Peter church in Felines (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Girac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Puybrun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 rue Camp del Payrot in Cornac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael church in St-Michel-Loubejou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified gate in Carennac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Estal (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Assumption in Biars-sur-Cere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 15 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Isiwal 14:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Calviac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Benedict church in Cahus (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Gagnac-sur-Cere (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Comiac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lucy church in Pontverny (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Sigismund church in St-Simon (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Theminettes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Assumption in Lacapelle-Marival (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Maurice church in St-Maurice-en-Quercy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Sonac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gerald church in Leyme (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in St-Vincent-du-Pendit (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate in Sousceyrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Assumption in Lentillac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Fontaine in Montlucon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planezes castle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Issepts (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Medard chapel in Lagarenie (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Reyrevignes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bannes Lot (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Salvere church in Saint-Sauvier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pardulphus church in Frontenat (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lamaids (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Martinien (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Treignat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Desiderius church in St-Eloy-d'Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Chamberat (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Palladius church in St-Palais (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Pardulphus church in Mesples (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Viplaix (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Eligius church in Vaux (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Marinus church in Nassigny (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Marien church in Courcais (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chazemais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Audes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ptuj Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martial church in Deneuille-les-M (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Desertines (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Estivareilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Victor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Angel Allier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over the Sioule river in St Pourcain (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Fiacre church in Monetay-sur-Allier (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Treban (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Noyant-d'Allier (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cressanges (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Le Montet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Rocles (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-en-Murat (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Sornin Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chatillon Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Cesset (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Fourilles (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montord (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Deneuille-les-Chantelle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Target (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Les Hauts Forts 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Les Hauts Forts 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Hyds (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Blomard (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Cesset (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Marien church in Target (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Beaune-d'Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Marcellus church in St-Marcel-en-Marcillat (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Ronnet (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Hyds (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Malicorne Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Marien church in Target (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Rocles (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Le Montet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Noyant-d'Allier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Blomard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Durdat (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Genesius church in St-Genest (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Thomas church in La Petite-Marche (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Terjat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Villebret (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lac des Plagnes 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac des Plagnes 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Stephen church in St-Etienne-de-Vicq (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 04:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Felix church in St-Felix (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 04:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent de Paul church in Magnet (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 04:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Germain church in Crechy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Eligius church in Montoldre (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Larequille (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermal establishment in Neris-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bouce Allier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Fargeol (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMO too bright. Please have a look to your image. --XRay 04:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Tournasol7 15:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. Back to "promoted". --XRay 04:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Reverianus church in Coulanges (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Catherine church in Liernolles (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Gervasius & Julian church in Barrais-Bussolles (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lapalisse (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Monetay-sur-Loire (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Perigny (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Roch church in Billezois (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aosta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Saint Bernard Pass (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Martinengo Palatini in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rinoceronte di Piazza Vittoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:37, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria del Mercato church in Iseo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria del Mercato church in Iseo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Iseo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graian Alps seen from Little Saint Bernard Pass 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Mount Carmel church in Desenzano del Garda (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Desenzano del Garda (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desenzano del Garda lighthouse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Gen. Papa in Desenzano del Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broletto & Torre del Popolo in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo della Loggia in Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Evangelist church in Brescia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Evangelist church in Brescia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Peschiera del Garda (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Peschiera del Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Bergamini in Peschiera del Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Paolo in Campo Marzio in Verona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022[edit]

Hallo Tournasol7,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 06:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adige river in Verona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former S Pietro in Monastero church in Verona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Organo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bard (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Garda nearby Peschiera (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldensian church in Verona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Cavour 11 in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Varmondo 5 in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Madre Antonia Verna in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Ivrea (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Guinefort church in Nosate (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Alessandro Volta in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Giovio in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Annunciata in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Domninus church in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Cavour 32 in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gratus church in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Guarnotta in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Donatus church in Orfengo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Donatus church in Orfengo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martha church in Lecco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Domninus church in Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post office in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Provinus church in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Thiene Bonin Longare in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Philip Neri church in Vicenza (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ospedale di San Marcello in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liceo Scientifico Paolo Lioy in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Cajetan church in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Lecco (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Coltignone from Lecco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diocesan Museum in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Philip Neri church in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Philip Neri church in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Nicola da Tolentino oratory in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Vicenza (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Angaran in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Michele detta dei Servi church in Vicenza (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retrone river in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis church in Treviso (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Vedelago (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Augustinus church in Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but remove the remains of two wires in left upper corner! --Isiwal 05:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Vedelago (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cagnan della Roggia in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac[edit]

Bonjour Tournasol7. Tu as créé la Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac en 2017 pour l'église se situant sur la commune de Flagnac, en Aveyron. Or, c'est le même nom pour la commune d'Agnac, en Lot-et-Garonne. J'ai donc créé la Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac (Lot-et-Garonne) et renommé l'ancienne catégorie en Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac (Aveyron).

Cependant, en regardant Wikidata, je m'aperçois que l'église en Aveyron porterait le nom de Sainte-Croix [1]. Es-tu sûr du nom de Saint-Saturnin pour l'église aveyronnaise ou aurais-tu été trompé par l'homonymie ? Père Igor (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Père Igor; effectivement j'ai vérifie le nom de cette église ici et j'aperçois qu'elle porterait le nom de Sainte-Croix. J'ai sais pas comment j'ai regardé ça en 2017, mais j'ai me suis trompé... Tournasol7 (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Je te laisse le soin du renommage de la catégorie et des photos. Étant donné que c'est une aventure qui m'est arrivée à quelques reprises, j'ai pris le parti maintenant d'éviter de nommer l'église d'une commune dans les descriptions de photos (sauf lorsqu'il y a plusieurs églises dans le bourg ou la ville) : cela permet de se passer de modifier ces descriptions une à une (exemple sur File:Agnac église (2).jpg, j'ai indiqué Église d'Agnac et non pas Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac). Quand tu auras terminé, je ferais le ménage en demandant la suppression de la catégorie erronée et je transformerais la Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac (Lot-et-Garonne) en Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac. Père Igor (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Père Igor; normalement tout est bon. J'ai crée une nouvelle categorie Category:Holy Cross church in Agnac et j'ai renommé des fichiers. Il reste juste de suppromer l'ancienne categorie qui est incorrecte. Cordialament, Tournasol7 (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merci. J'ai demandé la suppression de la catégorie erronée [2] ainsi que la suppression de la Category:Église Saint-Saturnin d'Agnac [3] afin de pouvoir ensuite renommer la catégorie de l'église du Lot-et-Garonne vers elle. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 16:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramparts of Oderzo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Blessaglia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemene river in Portogruaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Equestre ai Caduti in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza della Repubblica 97 in Portogruaro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary Major church in Treviso (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Rita church in Treviso (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cagnan Grando in Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Cajetan church in Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Umberto I 8 in Oderzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liceo statale Marco Belli in Portogruaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Largo Arturo Grandis in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Dal Moro in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Gottardo in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgo San Nicolo 19 in Portogruaro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Muzzana del Turgnano (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anthony church in Gorizia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Stati Provinciali & cathedral of Gorizia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Ignatius church from Castle of Gorizia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgo Castello 4 in Gorizia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2022[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

W imieniu organizatorów konkursu, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamnik z Tarnowa: Dzieki za info, ale poki co to jestem liderem w liczbie przeslanych zdjec w tegorocznej edycji :) Raczej przeslalem juz wszystko, ale moze jeszcze znajde cos w zanadrzu. Pozdrawiam, Tournasol7 (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Iseo (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Ursus church in Aosta (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graian Alps seen from Little Saint Bernard Pass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarriod de la Tour Castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aosta (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Iseo (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Martinengo Palatini in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armed Brescia in Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre del Popolo in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Brescia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Zeno al Foro in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Agostino Gallo in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Mount Carmel church in Desenzano del Garda (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Garda nearby Peschiera (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Organo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldensian church in Verona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Varmondo 5 in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Ivrea (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Re Umberto 1 in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Donatus church in Orfengo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Arduino 4 in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Re Umberto 1 in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Cavour 26 in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gratus church in Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Lecco (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Como (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martha church in Lecco (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Philip Neri church in Vicenza (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ospedale di San Marcello in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Cajetan church in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Michele detta dei Servi church in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Nicola da Tolentino oratory in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Cajetan church in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 04:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis church in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cagnan della Roggia in Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Caterina museum in Treviso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retrone river in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Vedelago (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qiuality --Michielverbeek 05:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Prisojnik from Vrsic Pass (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prisojnik from Vrsic Pass (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemene river in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Equestre ai Caduti & bell tower of the Portogruaro cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Gottardo in Portogruaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Muzzana del Turgnano (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anthony church in Gorizia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liceo statale Marco Belli in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Rita church in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 05:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramparts of Oderzo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Blessaglia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Terragio67 05:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Stati Provinciali in Gorizia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great War Museum in Gorizia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broletto in Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro sociale in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza Grande 17-18 in Oderzo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molini di Sant'Andrea in Portogruaro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte di Sant'Andrea in Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canale dei Buranelli in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walls of Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Tomaso in Treviso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortress of Peschiera del Garda (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Brescia in Peschiera dG (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza Grande in Oderzo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torresin in Oderzo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the cathedral of Portogruaro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Thiene Bonin Longare in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Tomaso in Treviso (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre dei Lamberti in Verona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Verticals are not straight, but photo has been taken from a small distance. It is looking natural for me, so QI for me --Michielverbeek 05:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumental Cemetery in Verona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonna con Edicola in Verona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Corona church in Vicenza (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Nicola da Tolentino oratory in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Castello in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Ursus church in Aosta (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archaeological museum in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Chiericati in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Olimpico in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 13:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 14:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Iseo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Iseo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre di Porta Castello in Vicenza (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aosta (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viale Conseil des Commis in Aosta (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Corona church in Vicenza (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Zeno al Foro in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Evangelist church in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Evangelist church in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Brescia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S Maria della Vittoria in Lecco (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Lecco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Donatus church in Orfengo (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Guinefort church in Nosate (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Vedelago (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Garda nearby Peschiera (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Ivrea (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Arduino 4 in Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gratus church in Ivrea (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis church in Treviso (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Blessaglia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Stati Provinciali in Gorizia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arch of Augustus in Aosta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Como from Como (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rua Conselheiro Lopes da Silva in Valenca (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rua Conselheiro Lopes da Silva in Valenca (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molini di Sant'Andrea in Portogruaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumental Cemetery in Verona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Vicenza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Como (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torresin in Oderzo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Como (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortress of Peschiera del Garda (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the cathedral of Portogruaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be white could be improved. --XRay 04:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentification of two plant images[edit]

Hi Tournasol7/Archive29, your image File:Malva neglecta in Bertholene.jpg does not show Malva neglecta. The flower is much too big relative to the leaves and unusually showy with its red stripes. I identified it tentatively as Malva sylvestris, even though this species is usually rather tall. However, I encountered such tiny plants with flowers near my place where they had been cut down by a lawnmower. The second image, File:Malva neglecta in Druelle.jpg is even more tricky. It does not show the rather shallowly lobed leaves of Malva neglecta or Malva sylvestris, but deeply incised leaves. So this could be Malva moschata or Malva alcea. Unfortunately, the best way (but not a very safe one) to tell these very similar species apart on photographs is to have a look at the outer calyx, which cannot be seen here. Having a look at the seeds would be even better, because Malva moschata has got hairy seeds, whereas Malva alcea does not. The hairs on the stem (stellate in Malva alcea, simple in Malva moschata) are also great for identifying the species. Therefore, this plant cannot be identified. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Donatus church in Orfengo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Vicenza (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porton del Luzo in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre di Porta Castello in Vicenza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Como (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Ursus church in Aosta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aosta (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Iseo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Steinberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Mattersburg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franciscan church in Eisenstadt (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehrturm in Breitenbrunn (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin cathedral in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 07:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Neudorf (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehrturm in Breitenbrunn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin cathedral in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenstadt (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerkapelle in Mattersburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Neudorf (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerkapelle in Mattersburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehrturm in Breitenbrunn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin cathedral in Eisenstadt (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenstadt (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Steinberg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerkapelle in Mattersburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Steinberg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Neudorf (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:55, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit too bright. Please try to fix it. --XRay 05:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenstadt (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Steinberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Neudorf (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Steinberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerkapelle in Mattersburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Neudorf (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. I see an over-processed artifact on the left side of the tower, but it's irrevelant to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 04:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franciscan church in Eisenstadt (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Terragio67 04:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Weppersdorf (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Mattersburg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal offices in Bystrice (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marianske namesti 18 in Jablunkov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marianske namesti 16 in Jablunkov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 04:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Petrijanec (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herzer Palace in Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church in Trinec (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal offices in Bystrice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George orthodox church in Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursuline church in Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Petrijanec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George orthodox church in Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herzer Palace in Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 18:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Petrijanec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursuline church in Varazdin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varazdin County palace (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George orthodox church in Varazdin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herzer Palace in Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George orthodox church in Varazdin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George orthodox church in Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pruszcz (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Turek (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Slesinskie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary Rynek in Sieradz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeglina river in Sieradz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szosa Chelminska 22 in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom Narodowy in Cieszyn (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main post office in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleboka 44 in Cieszyn (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleboka 62 in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chelmza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Chelmzynskie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek in Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tumska 16 in Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 15 in Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Sepolno Kraj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cieszyn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutheran church in Hazlach (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 14:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baszta Swawola in Wielun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is the orange color on the ruin from a streetlight or afterglow? If not, I think, it needs some adjustment to the white balance --FlocciNivis 16:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is the streetlight. --Tournasol7 19:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok, then it's good quality! --FlocciNivis 21:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Chelmza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a bird near the top of the steeple, should be removed (see note). Otherwise good quality --

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Chelmza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 13:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cieszyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Habsburg Palace in Cieszyn (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brama Klasztorna in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzywa Wieza in Torun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleboka 15 in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brama Mostowa in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quaöity --Llez 06:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teutonic Knights castle in Torun (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George Guildhall in Torun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 06:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Nationale in Montauban 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House under the Star in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Nationale in Montauban 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Nationale in Montauban 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:St Cajetan church in Vicenza (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Cajetan church in Vicenza (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mosteiro da Serra do Pilar (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosteiro da Serra do Pilar (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monastery hill in Strzelno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Turek (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artus Court in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas & Good Shepherd church in Slesin (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary church in Warta (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Sieradz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corpus Christi church in Wielun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franciscan church in Wielun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]